Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

dtd_tank

Membre depuis
27 juin 2016
Équipe favorite
Red Wings de Detroit
Messages dans les forums
990
Messages par jour
0.5
Sujets de discussion
164
Forum: Armchair-GM24 nov. à 14 h 11
Sujet: Testing Water on Boeser Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>justaBoss</b></div><div>Here's the thing - no team is going to move their star players for "decent middle-6 guys" and what if -projects of lower potential. They want something far sweeter than that. You haven't sent anything even close to Boeser equivalent here. Just a bit earlier there was a NYI fan who suggested trading Dobson+1st+2nd for Boeser. That's a gross overpayment, but still lot closer than this.

Nucks might be forced to move the guy due to monetary reasons, but should Detroit be after the guy the bare minimum they should offer is Veleno+2022 1st, and then start the discussions from that.</div></div>

I wouldn't hate moving Veleno or Ras, but I didn't include them because VAN has plenty of C depth in EP, Horvat, and Miller.

Also, DET won't give up a likely top 10 pick for a winger when their biggest need is a C. Just thought I'd test the waters.
Forum: Armchair-GM24 nov. à 14 h 1
Sujet: Testing Water on Boeser Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>justaBoss</b></div><div>No chance VAN takes that imo. There's just nothing interesting in that package, just a bunch of mid-level assets and a pending UFA.</div></div>

Fabbri is a decent middle 6 guy, better suited for 3rd line. Can be re-signed, but keep in mind that Boeser is coming without a contract for next year also.
Lindstrom is going to be a decent NHL dman, but of course not a star.
Tuo is a good prospect. Good potential to become middle pairing.

Sure, none of those guys are Boeser, but why would I send a Boeser equivalent plus more? :) The idea behind this is sending a two pieces that will provide solid depth and a couple futures for a guy that likely forces a trade or a big contract that VAN can't afford after EP &amp; Hughes.
Forum: Armchair-GM23 nov. à 14 h 38
Sujet: Twin Towers Pairing in 2023
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Roysboy72</b></div><div>True, it's crazy how smooth his skating is for his size. Him and Seider both have that smooth skating ability but Edvinsson is on another level. One part of his game that I find amazing is how elite his passes are. While he sometimes has lapses in his decision making (not as much as before the draft though), I've seen several highlight passes from him that left me awestruck. Making the kind of offensive plays that he does as an 18yo in the SHL is just insane, and his defense is so solid he's getting started in his own zone ~70% of the time. That's a lot of trust from an organization like Frolunda, who usually tend to shelter their young players a bit more than necessary.</div></div>

Imagine a couple years from now when we've got Johansson + Seider and Edvinsson + Hronek eating up 44-46 minutes of the game. :hearteyes
Forum: Armchair-GM19 nov. à 15 h 19
Sujet: Fire Benning and Blow It Up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lancebmx</b></div><div>Yeah I agree, this decent start they got might make people think they are better than they actually are. Be willing to trade picks and prospects for players and then we end up right where we started again.</div></div>

I disagree, actually. As it stands, Detroit is still a bottom 10 team. However, the 2 biggest reasons for that are lack of a 2C and the high-end guys we have in our org don't have the experience yet to make major impacts (I'm looking at Edvinsson, Johansson, Wallinder, Berggren, Niederbach, Cossa, etc).

With Larkin playing, our W-L record is 7-7-1. Without him, it drops *significantly* to 1-2-1 (not counting DAL, and the W was in OT). The reason for that is lack of center depth. Inject EP in those games, and our team is as good without Larkin in those games as we are with him now. Now, consider the games with Larkin playing, and we suddenly can shift Suter to LW, Fabbri to 3rd line, etc. We've suddenly got a deep top 9 and a good bottom line as well. Let's not forget that it'll get even better once Vrana gets back, making our current 2nd line turn into 2/3 of the 3rd line. Something like this...

Bert - Larkin - Raymond
Vrana - EP - Zadina
Fabbri - Suter - Rasmussen
Erne - Namestnikov - Gagner

I would love to have a top 10 pick this year, but I would do this deal in a heartbeat (while giving VAN a pick in the late teens this year and probably in the 20s next year).
Forum: Armchair-GM8 sept. à 10 h 33
Forum: Armchair-GM25 août à 14 h 6