Modifié 24 févr. 2021 à 17 h 24
Ducks decline swiftly. Gibson is their “team”. They lose him they enter a “second” rebuild unless they find themselves in another Andersen/Gibson situation; which they aren’t in before or after this trade.
I don’t like either prospect for Anaheim and the first is whatever.
Trading Gibson must either
A) be a benefit for the ducks
B) a more then fair trade to signify the movement of their star
C) be a move out of necessity (having too many goalies)
They are in none of these situations
I think this is where people get lost. I’m not saying/ ducks fans are not saying Gibson is worth 4 firsts, a top prospect and more (I mean some crazy people will but you get what I’m saying)
@op and
@ryminister_27 reading your posts comments (which is actually fair value rymi)
The ducks must look at this trade and say; yes it is worth losing our spine. This trade isn’t it. Rymi yours is fair but as I said, the ducks must WANT to accept the trade, not be satisfied. They need to go; oh damn. It is trading their best player but more so; the one player that will allow them to win. Their only game breaker. And he’s in net which is a very hard to find position.
It’s not the same as trading a top line player or trading a regular goalie. If that clarifies anything. He’s not worth the entire bank, but he won’t be cheap. Will he be worth it? Maybe not.
Could he be traded for this, I guess; but do I see happening? No.
I wouldn’t trade for him if I was any team unless the ducks were selling him, meaning theyre the ones initiating the trade not me buying him and having to pay premium.