SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Max rebuild

Créé par: justaBoss
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 5 févr. 2021
Publié: 5 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Assuming Toews is done for good - he ends up LTIR bound for the rest of his career.

Buying out Seabrook to free up a slot with protections.

Expansion draft
CHI protects
7F: Toews, Kane, Debrincat, Strome, Nylander, Highmore, Hagel
3D: Keith, Zadorov, Jones
1G: Lankinen

Seattle picks: Lucas Wallmark
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 750 000 $
22 550 000 $
21 750 000 $
2875 000 $
2875 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
35 000 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Jones, Caleb
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
2020-21 Trade deadline deal
EDM
  1. Entwistle, Mackenzie
  2. Murphy, Connor (1 925 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Janmark, Mattias
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
2020-21 Trade deadline deal
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
Söderberg, Carl
3.
CHI
    Expansion draft pick
    EDM
    1. Wallmark, Lucas [Droits de RFA]
    Détails additionnels:
    To Seattle
    4.
    CHI
    1. Rask, Victor
    2. Sokolov, Dmitry [Droits de RFA]
    3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
    4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
    MIN
    1. Strome, Dylan
    2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
    Détails additionnels:
    2021 NHL Entry Draft deal
    5.
    CHI
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (CBJ)
    CBJ
    1. Jones, Caleb
    2. Shaw, Andrew (975 000 $ retained)
    3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
    6.
    CHI
    1. Miller, Colin
    2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
    3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2022
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2023
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $66 724 342 $452 439 $4 532 500 $14 775 658 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 1
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    725 000 $725 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    850 000 $850 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    875 000 $875 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    875 000 $875 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    5 févr. 2021 à 19 h 17
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 19,813
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,396
    Every team says no
    5 févr. 2021 à 19 h 20
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 138
    Mentions "j'aime": 48
    You are out of your mind if you think EDM does that trade.
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    5 févr. 2021 à 19 h 24
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 40,902
    Mentions "j'aime": 18,617
    Until we see Kane on the block, it's just a "medium" rebuild
    5 févr. 2021 à 19 h 29
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,752
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
    Quoting: BornInAGretzkyJersey
    You are out of your mind if you think EDM does that trade.


    I mean, they strengthen their defense and their depth, their biggest weaknesses, via this trade, while confirming that they won't lose important assets during the expansion draft.

    If they view themselves as a playoff team, they need to do some moves. This is one idea.

    See what TB paid for Coleman for instance. Murphy at 50% retained is close to that in terms of money, and in terms of player value I'd say Murphy is above Coleman.
    5 févr. 2021 à 19 h 29
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,752
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    Until we see Kane on the block, it's just a "medium" rebuild


    Well true.
    5 févr. 2021 à 20 h 3
    #6
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 12
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Wild gm refused to trade dumba for Vincent Trocheck, he refused to trade dumba for Sean Monahan. So wild gm isn't trading for Dylan strome. Wild can get better c through trade or free agency once the expansion date comes & passes.
    Lightman13 a aimé ceci.
    5 févr. 2021 à 20 h 53
    #7
    Hakuna Matata
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 34,532
    Mentions "j'aime": 21,121
    If Dubas would want anyone from Chicago its Pius Suter lul. Give Matthews his Lions brother and make the Suter-Matthews-Marner line. The other person I would have said is Murphy but Holl is playing some incredible hockey so I dont think its needed.
    5 févr. 2021 à 22 h 5
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 4,453
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,167
    If Toews gets put onto LTIR and is done. Then he doesn't need to be protected, thereby freeing up a spot anyway. Buying out Seabrook would essentially free up two protection spots not just the one if Toews is also LTIR'ed.

    That is also a massive overpayment for Strome.

    That's a insta-no from Guerin, and while I don't like Rask, he is more or less a serviceable 4th line center even if he’s barely a NHL caliber level player only half the time. The issue is more to do with the fact he’s overpaid not really anything else. What he lacks in speed he kinda makes up for with his decent shot and a penchant for scoring at critical moments. Ironically, if he was paid like $2M less, nobody would care or **** about him. He's also a pretty cheap buyout, so this idea that a team would be doing us a favor and could demand a 1st for him is kinda silly.

    Drop the 1st, retain half on Rask, and swap out Sokolov for someone better. Sokolov is pretty much a bust at this point, so switch him for someone like Firstov to even out the trade value.

    Rask (50% retained)
    Firstov
    2022 2nd (MIN)

    For

    Strome
    2022 5th (CHI)
    Lightman13 a aimé ceci.
    5 févr. 2021 à 22 h 34
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 19,224
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,590
    Quoting: RazWild
    If Toews gets put onto LTIR and is done. Then he doesn't need to be protected, thereby freeing up a spot anyway. Buying out Seabrook would essentially free up two protection spots not just the one if Toews is also LTIR'ed.

    That is also a massive overpayment for Strome.

    That's a insta-no from Guerin, and while I don't like Rask, he is more or less a serviceable 4th line center even if he’s barely a NHL caliber level player only half the time. The issue is more to do with the fact he’s overpaid not really anything else. What he lacks in speed he kinda makes up for with his decent shot and a penchant for scoring at critical moments. Ironically, if he was paid like $2M less, nobody would care or **** about him. He's also a pretty cheap buyout, so this idea that a team would be doing us a favor and could demand a 1st for him is kinda silly.

    Drop the 1st, retain half on Rask, and swap out Sokolov for someone better. Sokolov is pretty much a bust at this point, so switch him for someone like Firstov to even out the trade value.

    Rask (50% retained)
    Firstov
    2022 2nd (MIN)

    For

    Strome
    2022 5th (CHI)


    Hawks aren't moving Strome for a bag of magic beans. He's easily the best player in the AGM and better then Firstov and a mid to late 1st or 2nd is nothing more then magic beans in a very shallow draft in the first and 2nd rounds. In last year's draft, maybe strome for a mid first, but otherwise keep Strome. Very few 23 year olds are putting up points at rate of .75ppg, and that's exactly what Dylan has been doing since becoming a Hawk. Very hard to find that in a B+ prospect, a 2nd round pick, a late 1st or even a mid 1st in the 2021 draft. Giant crap shoot not worth taking. Bottom line, Hawks have zero reason to move Strome. A year or two from now, Dach will eventually be the 1C, Strome the 2C, and Toews (if he comes back) the 3C; that's a pretty strong middle for the next few years.
    6 févr. 2021 à 6 h 3
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,752
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
    Modifié 6 févr. 2021 à 6 h 8
    Quoting: TogoBornPride29
    Wild gm refused to trade dumba for Vincent Trocheck, he refused to trade dumba for Sean Monahan. So wild gm isn't trading for Dylan strome. Wild can get better c through trade or free agency once the expansion date comes & passes.


    What the f*ck does Dumba have to do with this? He's not included in the exchange in the slightest.

    It's Sokolov+1st for Strome, and a 2nd for taking Rask's contract off Wild's hands.
    6 févr. 2021 à 6 h 6
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,752
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
    Quoting: RazWild
    If Toews gets put onto LTIR and is done. Then he doesn't need to be protected, thereby freeing up a spot anyway. Buying out Seabrook would essentially free up two protection spots not just the one if Toews is also LTIR'ed.

    That is also a massive overpayment for Strome.

    That's a insta-no from Guerin, and while I don't like Rask, he is more or less a serviceable 4th line center even if he’s barely a NHL caliber level player only half the time. The issue is more to do with the fact he’s overpaid not really anything else. What he lacks in speed he kinda makes up for with his decent shot and a penchant for scoring at critical moments. Ironically, if he was paid like $2M less, nobody would care or **** about him. He's also a pretty cheap buyout, so this idea that a team would be doing us a favor and could demand a 1st for him is kinda silly.

    Drop the 1st, retain half on Rask, and swap out Sokolov for someone better. Sokolov is pretty much a bust at this point, so switch him for someone like Firstov to even out the trade value.

    Rask (50% retained)
    Firstov
    2022 2nd (MIN)

    For

    Strome
    2022 5th (CHI)


    That counteroffer is a joke. Strome is absolutely worth more than two 2nd rounders and a cap dump.

    The initial offer is, as said previously, Sokolov+1st for Strome, which imo is fair for a 24 year old 50 point C. CHI agrees to take Rask's whole contract for a 2nd, like DET did with Staal.
    6 févr. 2021 à 6 h 8
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,752
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
    Quoting: aadoyle
    If Dubas would want anyone from Chicago its Pius Suter lul. Give Matthews his Lions brother and make the Suter-Matthews-Marner line. The other person I would have said is Murphy but Holl is playing some incredible hockey so I dont think its needed.


    Can't see Suter moving. ExD exempt young C. Very valuable for CHI.
    6 févr. 2021 à 8 h 8
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 4,453
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,167
    Quoting: justaBoss
    That counteroffer is a joke. Strome is absolutely worth more than two 2nd rounders and a cap dump.

    The initial offer is, as said previously, Sokolov+1st for Strome, which imo is fair for a 24 year old 50 point C. CHI agrees to take Rask's whole contract for a 2nd, like DET did with Staal.


    How is it any different than what the original offer was.

    Overpayed 4th liner
    A draft bust (Failed Prospect)
    Unprotected 1st
    2022 2nd rounder

    OR

    Same 4th liner at actual payed value
    Player with middle six potential (B-level Prospect)
    2022 2nd rounder

    Strome is better than his brother, there is no doubt about that. Doesn't change the fact that like his brother he's a middle sixer and not a top six center.

    He hit 51 points once, and benefited from playing with Kane. And hasn’t been close since. He might be a 40 point player, and even if he is, I wouldn't give up a unprotected 1st for him. His brother did much the same with Panarin. Would you give up a unprotected 1st for Ryan Strome?

    Until I see otherwise, I maintain Dylan had a career year riding the coattails of one of the leagues best wingers.

    Hell, Jason Zucker once scored 60+ points in a season. Does that make him a 60 point player then? Zucker could no doubt be a consistent 50 point player playing in the Penguins top six, doubt he would do so on the Wild.

    I could see a scenario where Strome hits 40 on a regular basis if he gels with one of Fiala or Kaprizov. But let's not pretend he isn't anything more then a low-end 2C.
    6 févr. 2021 à 8 h 37
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,752
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
    Quoting: RazWild
    How is it any different than what the original offer was.

    Overpayed 4th liner
    A draft bust (Failed Prospect)
    Unprotected 1st
    2022 2nd rounder

    OR

    Same 4th liner at actual payed value
    Player with middle six potential (B-level Prospect)
    2022 2nd rounder

    Strome is better than his brother, there is no doubt about that. Doesn't change the fact that like his brother he's a middle sixer and not a top six center.

    He hit 51 points once, and benefited from playing with Kane. And hasn’t been close since. He might be a 40 point player, and even if he is, I wouldn't give up a unprotected 1st for him. His brother did much the same with Panarin. Would you give up a unprotected 1st for Ryan Strome?

    Until I see otherwise, I maintain Dylan had a career year riding the coattails of one of the leagues best wingers.

    Hell, Jason Zucker once scored 60+ points in a season. Does that make him a 60 point player then? Zucker could no doubt be a consistent 50 point player playing in the Penguins top six, doubt he would do so on the Wild.

    I could see a scenario where Strome hits 40 on a regular basis if he gels with one of Fiala or Kaprizov. But let's not pretend he isn't anything more then a low-end 2C.


    I'd absolutely take that first package. Nothing in the second package is likely turning into something, but with first rounders the possibility is much higher. I don't think anyone views two seconds being as valuable as one first rounder.

    One year of Rask at fourth line production won't change much. See Bjugstad for instance. Getting him from PIT half retained cost you a grand total of 7th round pick. It doesn't matter if his value in a vacuum goes from 0,5 to 1 in the scale of x/100.

    Also, Strome was in pace for 53 points last year on a normal length year. He's a good 2C for pretty much any team, and relatively young at that. If CHI isn't getting a first for the guy, they'd rather just keep him than take such an useless punt.
    6 févr. 2021 à 12 h 32
    #15
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 12
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Quoting: justaBoss
    What the f*ck does Dumba have to do with this? He's not included in the exchange in the slightest.

    It's Sokolov+1st for Strome, and a 2nd for taking Rask's contract off Wild's hands.


    Read it again instead of cussing people. Minnesota isn't paying or trading for Dylan strome or care about moving rask
    6 févr. 2021 à 12 h 34
    #16
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,752
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
    Quoting: TogoBornPride29
    Read it again instead of cussing people. Minnesota isn't paying or trading for Dylan strome or care about moving rask


    Sorry about the language. Just don't see any correlation between the players MIN might be after and what is Dumba's perceiced value for the Wild.

    I don't see any clear reason why Wild wouldn't be interested in Strome.
    6 févr. 2021 à 12 h 38
    #17
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 12
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Sorry about the language. Just don't see any correlation between the players MIN might be after and what is Dumba's perceiced value for the Wild.

    I don't see any clear reason why Wild wouldn't be interested in Strome.


    Because he isn't better than trocheck, or sean Monahan that Minnesota gm has said no to
    6 févr. 2021 à 12 h 42
    #18
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,752
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
    Quoting: TogoBornPride29
    Because he isn't better than trocheck, or sean Monahan that Minnesota gm has said no to


    While I agree that MIN won't trade Dumba for whatever reasons to those guys, what correlation that has on a Sokolov+1st for Strome trade?

    Are you implying that Dumba's value = Sokolov+1st?
    6 févr. 2021 à 12 h 52
    #19
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 12
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Quoting: justaBoss
    While I agree that MIN won't trade Dumba for whatever reasons to those guys, what correlation that has on a Sokolov+1st for Strome trade?

    Are you implying that Dumba's value = Sokolov+1st?


    I am just telling you that Vincent trocheck, & Sean Monahan are better c's than strome. being that wild gm didn't want them, he wouldn't be interested in Dylan strome
    6 févr. 2021 à 12 h 56
    #20
    Démarrer sujet
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,752
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,471
    Quoting: TogoBornPride29
    I am just telling you that Vincent trocheck, & Sean Monahan are better c's than strome. being that wild gm didn't want them, he wouldn't be interested in Dylan strome


    One thing - I'm almost certain that Wild did WANT one of them. What they didn't want is to pay the amount their respective teams wanted for those guys.

    Strome could come cheaper than these guys, and has the potential to surpass one of them. Still only 24, relatively young guy.
    6 févr. 2021 à 15 h 38
    #21
    Hakuna Matata
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 34,532
    Mentions "j'aime": 21,121
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Can't see Suter moving. ExD exempt young C. Very valuable for CHI.


    True but when toews and dach come back they may move him. Cause stroke, toews and dach will be the top 9
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage