Its market value, hope the term is stil flippable though

Based purely on last season, I think it's an underpayment, but that was his only good season. So, we'll see.

It was only because he played with Panarin man but he had to prove himself this season

it's not an overpayment and it doesn't handcuff the team.
it's a great deal for both sides...

Not really an overpayment. They either did this, or likely have to walk away in arbitration so they chose to hold on to him

Shouldve been 1 year

It truly is.

I don't see the issue...

I think its a good deal

That’s what I think at 4.5

That’s what I think at 4.5

That’s what I think at 4.5

That’s what I think at 4.5

That’s what I think at 4.5

That’s what I think at 4.5

That’s what I think at 4.5

That’s a bad contract.

it's not that bad...it's not like it's a long term that is going to be suffocating for years

great players make good players better.
why, as a fan, does it matter if Strome produces with Panarin or without? the fact that those 2 have found chemistry together should be a positive outlook.
the Rangers just signed their stop gap 2C at a completely manageable AAV - stop complaining.

Should of been 1 imo

I’m not his biggest fan from a thing all the games. His play and anylitics I believe is not up on par with 4.5

Takes a team who gives bad contracts to know a bad contract (even tho there's nothing wrong with this).

explain how it is a bad contract?

as long as there isnt any NMC protection, Strome is Seattle bait

Stromes a 3c, got carried by Panarin. He doesn’t deserve 4.5M, especially on a 2 year deal. It’s bad.