SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Barkov at the deadline

Créé par: jnowariak
Équipe: 2020-21 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 19 oct. 2020
Publié: 19 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Thinking about what Barkov would cost at the deadline/offseason. Important to note that this is essentially for 1 year and negotiating rights, so the value should be less than Reilly and Laine given the amount of team control. I don’t think Dumba would be a centerpiece in a Barkov deal given the current lineup with Ekblad and Yandle. The question becomes whether MIN can acquire the right pieces while also paying Barkov 10
mil. I’d love to have him but I wonder if we aren’t just gonna out ourselves into a similar position as FLA. if Dumba could pull in a top 6 wing and Kaprizov pans out, this isn’t a bad place to be.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
Transactions
FLA
  1. Eriksson Ek, Joel
  2. Fiala, Kevin
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (MIN)
Détails additionnels:
Best 2021 1st
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de PIT
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $79 136 924 $0 $925 000 $2 363 076 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
700 000 $700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 oct. 2020 à 0 h 21
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
He'll cost a lot more than that.
19 oct. 2020 à 0 h 30
#2
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,147
Mentions "j'aime": 6,988
First off, it’s for two years, not one. And this upcoming deadline this is the kind of package its going to take.
1. A teams best prospect. One that would absolutely kill to give up.
2. A real good roster player.
3. Two first round picks.
19 oct. 2020 à 0 h 32
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: justaBoss
He'll cost a lot more than that.


That was my first thought as well but not if you look at comparables. Remember Barkov would essentially be a 1 year rental as he is a UFA after his contract is up (I assume this is a deadline deal or in the offseason).

Stone cost Oscar Lindberg and a late 2nd for a similar scenario. O’Reilly cost a 1st, 2nd, Thompson, Sobotka, and Berglund. I think this is a competitive offer. The real question is whether we will be able to add the remaining pieces.
19 oct. 2020 à 0 h 37
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: Bcarlo25
First off, it’s for two years, not one. And this upcoming deadline this is the kind of package its going to take.
1. A teams best prospect. One that would absolutely kill to give up.
2. A real good roster player.
3. Two first round picks.


The assumption is that he plays in Minnesota next year, only 1 guaranteed. Feel free to disagree but that’s the assumption I’m working under.

I would ask you to provide comparables for the package you propose. I think it’s a reasonable place to start but you should also think about how FLA maximizes the return if they know they aren’t going to resign him.
19 oct. 2020 à 0 h 44
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 2,087
Mentions "j'aime": 710
It would be rossi kaprizov brodin and some picks.
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 0 h 44
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: Hockey91
It would be rossi kaprizov brodin and some picks.


Seems steep.
Jexus et NorthStarHockey a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 0 h 50
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 406
Mentions "j'aime": 429
I don’t think Minnesota should be emptying the cupboards just yet. I understand the need for an elite center, but they’ve got Rossi. They’ve got Khovanov. They’ve got Khustnutdinov, McBain, Beckman, etc etc. Surely at least ONE will fit the bill. For now I think it’d be better off long term just sticking with the process for a year or two. There’s some key UFA classes coming up here too.
19 oct. 2020 à 0 h 51
#8
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
For everyone saying that package isn't enough I mean -sure I suppose- but Fiala had only 8 fewer points than Barkov this year in 5 minutes less per game with way worse linemates (!) and he's an RFA to boot. JEE and a 15th or so pick are quite nice assets too. Gosh.

Just saying that if Barkov didn't re-sign Florida would absolutely make out like bandits there... gadzooks

Is 2 years of Barkov worth that risk ultimately? 😐
jnowariak a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 0 h 53
#9
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
Quoting: Hockey91
It would be rossi kaprizov brodin and some picks.


Only if Barkov had 8 years remaining at 6M per year
MNBassman et NorthStarHockey a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 0 h 54
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: Radu47
For everyone saying that package isn't enough I mean -sure I suppose- but Fiala had only 8 fewer points than Barkov this year in 5 minutes less per game with way worse linemates (!) and he's an RFA to boot. JEE and a 15th or so pick are quite nice assets too. Gosh.

Just saying that if Barkov didn't re-sign Florida would absolutely make out like bandits there... gadzooks

Is 2 years of Barkov worth that risk ultimately? 😐


I think the Wild could make this deal happen but I think they would have to give up the pieces to make them a real threat in doing so. I just don’t know if it’s worth it unles GMBG works some magic with Dumba and other trades as well.
19 oct. 2020 à 2 h 35
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,450
Mentions "j'aime": 576
Quoting: Hockey91
It would be rossi kaprizov brodin and some picks.


No, no it would not. Thats a major overpayment, he is not McDavid jeez
NorthStarHockey a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 3 h 43
#12
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: jnowariak
That was my first thought as well but not if you look at comparables. Remember Barkov would essentially be a 1 year rental as he is a UFA after his contract is up (I assume this is a deadline deal or in the offseason).

Stone cost Oscar Lindberg and a late 2nd for a similar scenario. O’Reilly cost a 1st, 2nd, Thompson, Sobotka, and Berglund. I think this is a competitive offer. The real question is whether we will be able to add the remaining pieces.


Barkov isn't a half a year rental like Stone. He's a step up from the guy in terms of both level, position and contract. ROR wasn't a rental in the slightest, his current contract that has 3 years left was signed with Buffalo, and it was widely considered as the stupidest trade Botteril made. The comparables don't work.

Considering that Wild needs to refine their prospect pool, I don't see going after Barkov as a wise move. The cost will be too hefty. Think about your current offer and adding one of Rossi or Kaprizov and yet another first to the pile. That's in the ballpark.
jnowariak et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 8 h 31
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Not even remotely close for Aleksander Barkov, Start with one of Rossi or Kaprizov and then add big time.
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 9 h 29
#14
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,733
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
If Florida trades Barkov they might as well fold it up and move to a different city.
19 oct. 2020 à 9 h 53
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: justaBoss
Barkov isn't a half a year rental like Stone. He's a step up from the guy in terms of both level, position and contract. ROR wasn't a rental in the slightest, his current contract that has 3 years left was signed with Buffalo, and it was widely considered as the stupidest trade Botteril made. The comparables don't work.

Considering that Wild needs to refine their prospect pool, I don't see going after Barkov as a wise move. The cost will be too hefty. Think about your current offer and adding one of Rossi or Kaprizov and yet another first to the pile. That's in the ballpark.


To your second, and I think most important, point, I think the the Wild don’t get better by making the deal in this iteration. They turn their best assets into a single better asset. It’d sure be fun if they did manage to get him though.

To your first point, I think this offer is better than the one for Stone and it is close to the value of the ROR deal. FLA gets better in this deal. But as for anticipated value, I think this is what a team may offer. Anymore really is too much for a player unless it’s the last piece for a cup. WPG has probably placed a similar, super high value to it now but nobody will pay it. Eventually Laine will love for some thing like this plus another pick or prospect given his team control.
19 oct. 2020 à 9 h 55
#16
MNBassman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 8,146
Mentions "j'aime": 3,571
Quoting: Hockey91
It would be rossi kaprizov brodin and some picks.


Not in a million years!!
NorthStarHockey a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 10 h 19
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 160
Mentions "j'aime": 89
Quoting: Hockey91
It would be rossi kaprizov brodin and some picks.


If that is the price Florida wants. Unfortunately, Florida watches him walk in UFA for nothing since their asking price was too high.
MNBassman a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 10 h 26
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 2,087
Mentions "j'aime": 710
Quoting: NorthStarHockey
If that is the price Florida wants. Unfortunately, Florida watches him walk in UFA for nothing since their asking price was too high.

Or they just resign him
Eli a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 10 h 26
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 2,087
Mentions "j'aime": 710
Quoting: MNBassman
Not in a million years!!

Guess you dont get one of the best all around centers.
19 oct. 2020 à 11 h 10
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: Hockey91
Or they just resign him


I assume they will. But if they know he won't resign, they need to get something for him.
19 oct. 2020 à 11 h 53
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 2,087
Mentions "j'aime": 710
Quoting: jnowariak
I assume they will. But if they know he won't resign, they need to get something for him.


Planets of teams will pay full price for his skill set. You gotta give up a lot to get a lot.
19 oct. 2020 à 13 h 11
#22
MNBassman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 8,146
Mentions "j'aime": 3,571
Quoting: Hockey91
Guess you dont get one of the best all around centers.


Im a big Barkov fan, but i would sleep very well at night not making that trade.
NorthStarHockey et Hockey91 a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 13 h 35
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: MNBassman
Im a big Barkov fan, but i would sleep very well at night not making that trade.


I think that's the right idea. lets say you replace one of Fiala or Ek with Beckman or Boldy. Do you do that as a WIld fan?
19 oct. 2020 à 18 h 29
#24
MNBassman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 8,146
Mentions "j'aime": 3,571
Quoting: jnowariak
I think that's the right idea. lets say you replace one of Fiala or Ek with Beckman or Boldy. Do you do that as a WIld fan?


So, Fiala, Beckman, Brodin plus picks for Barkov? The picks (for me) couldn’t be 1sts - i think the 3 players are close to my max.
19 oct. 2020 à 19 h 31
#25
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: MNBassman
So, Fiala, Beckman, Brodin plus picks for Barkov? The picks (for me) couldn’t be 1sts - i think the 3 players are close to my max.


Woah, my bad. One nhler, one prospect, one pick. Must have misread that.
MNBassman a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage