SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

anderson contract

Créé par: habs1289
Équipe: 2020-21 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 6 oct. 2020
Publié: 6 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I think he signs something similar to na alex tuch type deal
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
64 500 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
Logo de VGK
Logo de MTL
Logo de OTT
Logo de PHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1981 500 000 $69 831 309 $0 $3 137 500 $11 668 691 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 oct. 2020 à 17 h 33
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,914
Mentions "j'aime": 24,608
Could be a nice deal. I’d say he can be a yearly 22-23 goal and 20-25 assists.
6 oct. 2020 à 17 h 34
#2
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Could be nice but also a big risk if he gets re-injured
Fran615 et Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 17 h 35
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,187
Mentions "j'aime": 504
Hey buddy.

I was about to give it a try, figuring out the AAV and term for that guy.

I think 6 years is way too much though because of his shoulder injury.

I'd think they might settle for 4 years (since the Habs would probably ask him to try for 3 and he'd want 100 years

4 years @ 4?

If I'm the Habs, I really try to sell him on a 3 years @ 3.5; tell him the ball's in his court to prove his worth.
pinslack a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 17 h 37
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 1,570
Mentions "j'aime": 503
he had 4 points last year...
6 oct. 2020 à 17 h 37
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,187
Mentions "j'aime": 504
Quoting: jcash08
Could be nice but also a big risk if he gets re-injured


That's why I'd be worried about the 6 years figure. Think Nathan Horton, Andrew Ladd.
jcash08 a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 17 h 37
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Yeah it’s close. Because of injury history Columbus didn’t want to sign him long term.
Looks good
6 oct. 2020 à 17 h 38
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,187
Mentions "j'aime": 504
Quoting: Blues4TheCup
he had 4 points last year...


On paper, I hate the deal. I said the same thing to my brother.
But apparently, he played all those games injured and THEN got surgery and will have had one year to fully recover.

I just don't like any deal over 4 years.
6 oct. 2020 à 17 h 39
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,871
Mentions "j'aime": 1,299
Quoting: Blues4TheCup
he had 4 points last year...


They traded a 72 point player for him. They already took a risk trading for him so doubt they don’t go all in on him

Perceived value
Fran615 a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 17 h 40
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,187
Mentions "j'aime": 504
Quoting: OlegP
Yeah it’s close. Because of injury history Columbus didn’t want to sign him long term.
Looks good


Can't blame them AT ALL.

Hockey experts seem to agree though, that MTL had too many C and not enough RW.
CLB had too many RW and not enough C.
Seems like a good deal for both teams.

Now... it all depends on that f*****in injury.
6 oct. 2020 à 17 h 40
#10
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: Fran615
That's why I'd be worried about the 6 years figure. Think Nathan Horton, Andrew Ladd.


Aboslutely especially because he has been injured two of the past three years, missing significant time. Although the 27 goals, 47 points and 214 hits in his only full season is pretty nice! It would be a big risk to sign him long term but could also pan out very nicely.
6 oct. 2020 à 17 h 41
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,187
Mentions "j'aime": 504
Quoting: OlegP
They traded a 72 point player for him. They already took a risk trading for him so doubt they don’t go all in on him

Perceived value


I agree with you. They might exagerate. BUT, with the whole COVID sh*t show, players might be a bit less outrageous in their demands.
Let's hope.
OlegP a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2020 à 17 h 42
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 2,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,047
BurgerVan got FLEECED. Nice work by Jarmo
6 oct. 2020 à 17 h 44
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
He's a guy you want in the playoffs, who cares about the regular season.
But it's more than CBJ was offering, so off he goes.
Wish him luck in MTL....glad he's not in the Metro anymore.
6 oct. 2020 à 18 h 4
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,187
Mentions "j'aime": 504
Quoting: dzad96
BurgerVan got FLEECED. Nice work by Jarmo


Nobody, anywhere, says that one team got ROBBED.
It really seems like a fair deal from both sides.

Even though I feel, as a Habs fan, Domi was worth more. But positional needs... wow, for both teams, that's perfect.
6 oct. 2020 à 18 h 8
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 2,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,047
Quoting: Fran615
Nobody, anywhere, says that one team got ROBBED.
It really seems like a fair deal from both sides.

Even though I feel, as a Habs fan, Domi was worth more. But positional needs... wow, for both teams, that's perfect.


FLEECED. Anderson is a hospital patient and you gave up a third to do it.
6 oct. 2020 à 18 h 22
#16
Démarrer sujet
Habs1289
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 479
Mentions "j'aime": 104
Quoting: dzad96
FLEECED. Anderson is a hospital patient and you gave up a third to do it.


You're confused getting fleeced is paying 3 fwds over 10 million while having a shi**y D-core
6 oct. 2020 à 18 h 26
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 2,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,047
Quoting: habs1289
You're confused getting fleeced is paying 3 fwds over 10 million while having a shi**y D-core


HAHAHAHA good one. The leafs suck. Yes. But were talking about the Habs. The worst counter argument one can make is completely changing the subject. Clearly you agree with me seeing as you have no counter arguments regarding the Habs. Checkmate.
6 oct. 2020 à 18 h 32
#18
Démarrer sujet
Habs1289
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 479
Mentions "j'aime": 104
Quoting: dzad96
HAHAHAHA good one. The leafs suck. Yes. But were talking about the Habs. The worst counter argument one can make is completely changing the subject. Clearly you agree with me seeing as you have no counter arguments regarding the Habs. Checkmate.


well at least were in agreement that the leafs suck wink haha. But i personally think the pick should've went the other way wouldn't call it getting fleeced , but i think columbus won the trade.. Also was only talking about Andersons contract not the trade itself
6 oct. 2020 à 18 h 47
#19
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: dzad96
FLEECED. Anderson is a hospital patient and you gave up a third to do it.


I wouldn't say they were fleeced lol. The third should have gone in the opposite direction. But overall it is a decently fair deal. Although the third really means nothing to Montreal as they have plenty of those middle round picks for the next two seasons.
6 oct. 2020 à 19 h 10
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 977
Mentions "j'aime": 837
If he's 100% this is a steal of a contract. I'd expect at least a few 30 goal seasons. Great PKer and was really improving his playmaker before getting hurt as well. I sure hope he's completely recovered cause if he is, he's one hell of a player.
habs1289 a aimé ceci.
7 oct. 2020 à 10 h 1
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,187
Mentions "j'aime": 504
Quoting: dzad96
FLEECED. Anderson is a hospital patient and you gave up a third to do it.


I agree. The deal will become a bust if Anderson cannot bounce back from injury.
If he heals 100% - he will have a full year to do so - and comes back to where he was before, then that deal is great.

You call it like this on pure speculation that he cannot bounce back. Pure speculation on your part. Acting as though you're a doctor that sees in the future.
Have you checked with the medical staff that know him and evaluate him?
Do you know he was about to get back in the lineup had the CBJ reached the 2nd round?

No. Pure speculation and I can guarantee you just dislike the Habs, that's all.

A more balanced mind, a more genuine comment would be this:

IF Anderson doesn't recover well from his injury = Habs lost the trade.
IF Anderson bounces back from injury = fair deal.

And what about this, if you want to be fair and balanced, and not just speaking with emotion (hating the Habs while not having examined Anderson's health and going on sheer projection):

IF Domi bounces back from a bad season, AND Anderson doesn't recover from injury = Habs got fleeced.
IF Domi doesn't bounce back from a bad season, AND Anderson does recover well from injury = Columbus got fleeced.

That is being fair and balanced, without juvenile emotions.
habs1289 a aimé ceci.
7 oct. 2020 à 11 h 41
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 2,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,047
Quoting: Fran615
I agree. The deal will become a bust if Anderson cannot bounce back from injury.
If he heals 100% - he will have a full year to do so - and comes back to where he was before, then that deal is great.

You call it like this on pure speculation that he cannot bounce back. Pure speculation on your part. Acting as though you're a doctor that sees in the future.
Have you checked with the medical staff that know him and evaluate him?
Do you know he was about to get back in the lineup had the CBJ reached the 2nd round?

No. Pure speculation and I can guarantee you just dislike the Habs, that's all.

A more balanced mind, a more genuine comment would be this:

IF Anderson doesn't recover well from his injury = Habs lost the trade.
IF Anderson bounces back from injury = fair deal.

And what about this, if you want to be fair and balanced, and not just speaking with emotion (hating the Habs while not having examined Anderson's health and going on sheer projection):

IF Domi bounces back from a bad season, AND Anderson doesn't recover from injury = Habs got fleeced.
IF Domi doesn't bounce back from a bad season, AND Anderson does recover well from injury = Columbus got fleeced.

That is being fair and balanced, without juvenile emotions.


https://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=130519
https://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=138920

Yeah.... I'll take Domi ALL day EVERY day. And it ain't even close.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage