SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

My Ideal 2021 Roster

Créé par: jamesvanhockey
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 6 oct. 2020
Publié: 6 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Right up against the cap but they could make it work (this is with a scratched league min player as well).


Lots of backup/depth options for if european signees don't work out or in case of a condensed schedule where guys need days off:
Spezza/Bracco
Rodrigues/Gauthier
Barbanov/Korshkov/Malgin
Lethonen/Sandin

Also all the replacement guys have a lower cap hit so this is the absolute max the team cap would be.

Trades:
1. Engval is a cap dump but still has a little value as a well-developed bottom 6 guy who's shown good potential

2. Dubas loves cap rention. Savard would be a great partner for Rielly. Giving away two good young RFAs in Dermott and Mikheyev plus a 2nd round pick (because of the cap retention).
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3725 000 $
3725 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
11 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
22 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
    Any team for a 4th round pick
    2.
    TOR
    1. Savard, David (2 125 000 $ retained)
    CBJ
    1. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
    2. Mikheyev, Ilya [Droits de RFA]
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2022
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2181 500 000 $78 139 783 $0 $0 $3 360 217 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    821 667 $821 667 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    700 000 $700 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    -1 062 500 $-1 062 500 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    700 000 $700 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    6 oct. 2020 à 11 h 8
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 6,661
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,520
    Columbus is going to decline that, and you want retention. They dont even need wingers or D. This trade is useless for them. Teams are not here only to help the leafs.
    Viqsi, benjgc et gmurrayt a aimé ceci.
    6 oct. 2020 à 11 h 16
    #2
    KM87
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 813
    Mentions "j'aime": 101
    Quoting: Copenhagen
    Columbus is going to decline that, and you want retention. They dont even need wingers or D. This trade is useless for them. Teams are not here only to help the leafs.


    That's an overpay for Savard. 1yr of him for a promising 23yr old D man, 25yr old forward & a 2nd? No thanks. Don't let Leaf hate blind your judgement.
    6 oct. 2020 à 11 h 16
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 6,347
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,561
    CBJ isn’t going to retain on that contract. They went further than TML and aren’t rebuilding so the 2nd pick won’t make sense. If this was a deal with BUF/DET/OTT/ANA/LA/NJ then they would be looking for picks and be willing to retain salary. Also don’t think those players fit the Torts system so that may be an issue as well. Different team in a different situation and I see a version of that trade happening
    Copenhagen, Viqsi et benjgc a aimé ceci.
    6 oct. 2020 à 11 h 20
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 6,661
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,520
    Quoting: KM87
    That's an overpay for Savard. 1yr of him for a promising 23yr old D man, 25yr old forward & a 2nd? No thanks. Don't let Leaf hate blind your judgement.


    Great. Like I said No Deal
    benjgc a aimé ceci.
    6 oct. 2020 à 11 h 20
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 1,802
    Mentions "j'aime": 564
    I can see the Leafs going after Savard, but not sure this is going to move the needle for Columbus (doesn't really fit their needs). I would think they're more interested in Kerfoot.

    I don't see why you trade Engvall to pay Maroon. Engvall is probably more valuable to this team, Maroon is old, slow and very over-rated. Your 21 man roster also isn't going to work once the Leafs have 2 short-term injuries where they can't just move guys up and down as you have suggested. Especially since many of these players are waiver eligible.

    They have also said Evan Rodrigues is going UFA and I doubt they keep Bracco (certainly not on the big roster).
    6 oct. 2020 à 11 h 24
    #6
    mostly harmless
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2016
    Messages: 7,000
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,487
    Quoting: KM87
    That's an overpay for Savard. 1yr of him for a promising 23yr old D man, 25yr old forward & a 2nd? No thanks. Don't let Leaf hate blind your judgement.

    That might be more assets than the Leafs might normally want to pay, but that doesn't make those assets valuable to the CBJ in a Savard trade.
    benjgc a aimé ceci.
    6 oct. 2020 à 11 h 25
    #7
    KM87
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 813
    Mentions "j'aime": 101
    You don't even need Savard. Especially at that price. People will tell you that's not enough for him, but they're usually just Leaf haters. He only has 1yr left on his contract, is turning 30 & is coming off a down year. I wouldn't give up 2 young controllable assets with upside and pick for him. Demelo could play top mins with Reilly. Though he'll likely get 3-4 mill on the market. Cheaper options could be had to play 3rd pairing mins with Lehtonen & you'd have more cap space.
    6 oct. 2020 à 13 h 6
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 62
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Quoting: newballcoach
    I can see the Leafs going after Savard, but not sure this is going to move the needle for Columbus (doesn't really fit their needs). I would think they're more interested in Kerfoot.

    I don't see why you trade Engvall to pay Maroon. Engvall is probably more valuable to this team, Maroon is old, slow and very over-rated. Your 21 man roster also isn't going to work once the Leafs have 2 short-term injuries where they can't just move guys up and down as you have suggested. Especially since many of these players are waiver eligible.

    They have also said Evan Rodrigues is going UFA and I doubt they keep Bracco (certainly not on the big roster).


    Maroon adds some needed leadership, winning pedigree and grit that this team needs. I like Engval but just seems like he's the odd guy out for me (and with that little pay raise can't be an extra fwd).

    I actually disagree about the 21 man roster. Most the guys that would switch around are all waiver exempt. Lethonen, barabanov, robertson, Korshkov, Sandin, liljigren. And guys who aren't like bracco, Gauthier, Malgin I'm not too worried if we lose them via waiver claim. Even a guy like Rodrigues wouldn't be horrible if sent down and claimed.

    Rodrigues is not getting a QO but that doesn't mean they don't sign him cheaper than his 2m QO and bracco is a stretch but like I said is a depth option to switch out with spezza. Shelterd minutes, 2nd unit pp.
    6 oct. 2020 à 13 h 14
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 62
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Quoting: Copenhagen
    Columbus is going to decline that, and you want retention. They dont even need wingers or D. This trade is useless for them. Teams are not here only to help the leafs.


    Quoting: Copenhagen
    Columbus is going to decline that, and you want retention. They dont even need wingers or D. This trade is useless for them. Teams are not here only to help the leafs.


    Yes while it doesn't solve their C problem it certainly provides good value for Savard. It's not like they only trade with the leafs this year. They can flip other assets for a C and then fill in those spots with Dermott and Mikheyev who are both really good young players. Only reason I move them from Toronto is because we have so many young guys and could use some more developed vets in the mix
    6 oct. 2020 à 13 h 14
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 1,802
    Mentions "j'aime": 564
    Quoting: jamesvanhockey
    Maroon adds some needed leadership, winning pedigree and grit that this team needs. I like Engval but just seems like he's the odd guy out for me (and with that little pay raise can't be an extra fwd).

    I actually disagree about the 21 man roster. Most the guys that would switch around are all waiver exempt. Lethonen, barabanov, robertson, Korshkov, Sandin, liljigren. And guys who aren't like bracco, Gauthier, Malgin I'm not too worried if we lose them via waiver claim. Even a guy like Rodrigues wouldn't be horrible if sent down and claimed.

    Rodrigues is not getting a QO but that doesn't mean they don't sign him cheaper than his 2m QO and bracco is a stretch but like I said is a depth option to switch out with spezza. Shelterd minutes, 2nd unit pp.


    I don't want to pay a 4th liner 1.5 million to provide leadership and minimal on-ice impact.

    So for your 21 man roster. If Jake Muzzin and John Tavares have day-to-day injuries at the same time (which happened last year) how are you filling those spots? You would have to send down a player with a salary over 2 million to be able to call up the 2 players who you need to fill the roster. You're not exposing Gautheir etc. to waivers, you're exposing Hyman, Johnsson, Holl, or Kerfoot in that scenario. And they will get claimed and that is a big deal. A 21 man roster isn't going to work, especially if they condense the schedule.

    Switching around one player is not the issue, it's when you have to switch around more than one.
    6 oct. 2020 à 13 h 20
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 6,661
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,520
    Quoting: jamesvanhockey
    Yes while it doesn't solve their C problem it certainly provides good value for Savard. It's not like they only trade with the leafs this year. They can flip other assets for a C and then fill in those spots with Dermott and Mikheyev who are both really good young players. Only reason I move them from Toronto is because we have so many young guys and could use some more developed vets in the mix


    Yah or they can actually make a trade with a team that has a player they actually need.
    benjgc a aimé ceci.
    6 oct. 2020 à 13 h 33
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 1,719
    Mentions "j'aime": 907
    Quoting: Copenhagen
    Yah or they can actually make a trade with a team that has a player they actually need.


    DING DING DING DING DING. I can't imagine there are GMs salivating over the chance to make their jobs way more complicated by trying to find six trade partners where two or three would work.
    6 oct. 2020 à 16 h 54
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 62
    Mentions "j'aime": 6
    Quoting: benjgc
    DING DING DING DING DING. I can't imagine there are GMs salivating over the chance to make their jobs way more complicated by trying to find six trade partners where two or three would work.


    Well they just got Domi to fill a C need and now have an opening on wing..... Mikheyev could certainly fill that and dermott fills, Savard's empty spot...
    6 oct. 2020 à 17 h 7
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 1,719
    Mentions "j'aime": 907
    Quoting: jamesvanhockey
    Well they just got Domi to fill a C need and now have an opening on wing..... Mikheyev could certainly fill that and dermott fills, Savard's empty spot...


    We need a top-6 LW; no guarantee Mikheyev is really ready for that role, nor whether we could afford him too. Plus we've got too many D as is; we'd be looking to fill Savard's spot with Andrew Peeke or Kukan (while moving up Nutivaara to 3RD in the latter case). And I don't think Dermott holds much interest for Columbus, tbh. We're more likely to try and package Korpi and Savard with other assets for someone like Boeser/Gaudreau. Not ruling this out, but I think it unlikely.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage