SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Boston Trade Fixed

Créé par: ForsbergForVezina
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 2 sept. 2020
Publié: 2 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I saw the Boston trade on a Bruins ACGM yesterday and actually really liked it. I'm really high on Kase, which is maybe blinding me a bit, but he's a really solid two-way player. The original post included John Moore for the Hawks to take, which I didn't hate, but he's a replacement level defenseman and for three more years at $2.75 MM, that's not the best investment. If Boston was completely hung up on us taking him, I still think I'd do it, but for now, I'm just going with the retention, which is basically the same as it would cost if we took Moore back.

As for the lineup, most of the improve is going to have to come internally. Dach, Nylander and Suter will have to keep getting better and DeBrincat and Strome both need to bounce back after relative poor seasons. Kase will be a nice boost, hopefully in time he can replace Saad's impact and I think he will. Defense is still a question mark, but hopefully Mitchell will be as good as advertised and Boqvist will take some steps forward in his development. A full season from CDH would also be a nice added bonus (fingers crossed). My hope is that Beaudin or Carlsson can come up as well at some point but seeing how well Koekkoek played this year, I think he gets the call first unless one of those two guys blows everyone away at camp.

If those steps forward are taken and we get another good year out of Crow, I think we've got a good shot at getting back to the playoffs and maybe making some more noise this time
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 500 000 $
65 750 000 $
21 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Strand, Austin [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (LAK)
LAK
  1. Määttä, Olli
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Caggiula, Drake [Droits de RFA]
3.
CHI
  1. Kase, Ondrej
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Saad, Brandon (1 675 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de BOS
Logo de LAK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $73 194 539 $1 090 244 $5 900 000 $8 305 461 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 sept. 2020 à 12 h 37
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,441
Mentions "j'aime": 930
I dont think Boston already gives up on Kase. Hes a really skilled player and I dont think theyll buy in too much on his performance after all the time off. No need to sell low
bhavikp27 a aimé ceci.
2 sept. 2020 à 12 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,224
Mentions "j'aime": 9,590
Quoting: shmoeman
I dont think Boston already gives up on Kase. Hes a really skilled player and I dont think theyll buy in too much on his performance after all the time off. No need to sell low


Saad is a pretty big upgrade to Kase and that's no knock on Kase but more a testament to a very good player in Saad. Hawks should pass, Kase is not who they need on the first line.
2 sept. 2020 à 12 h 39
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,899
Mentions "j'aime": 18,617
I used to say the criticism of Kase being fragile/soft were overblown...I'm not so sure now.
2 sept. 2020 à 12 h 39
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,588
Mentions "j'aime": 5,458
No thanks. And not sure why people think Bruins will trade Kase. He's looked good; just matter of time before he produces. Even though Saad is better right now, he makes $3.4M more (BOS have several free agents) and only has one year left.
2 sept. 2020 à 12 h 44
#5
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,797
Mentions "j'aime": 9,971
I don't think it makes sense to trade Saad during the offseason. He'll garner at least a late 1st @ the TDL next year if the Hawks are out of it. If they're still in it....the Hawks will want Saad.
2 sept. 2020 à 12 h 51
#6
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,679
Mentions "j'aime": 8,302
Yeah i think saad is a pretty decent upgrade at the moment but hes only signed one more year and I think they're hoping kase is a longer term fix on that rw. Value seems ok.
ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
2 sept. 2020 à 12 h 57
#7
MMBzFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,111
Mentions "j'aime": 281
Sweeney needs his draft picks now. Already gave up a 1st to get rid of Backes. I’m ok with the trade of Kase but I would offer a prospect instead of a 2nd or the 2nd turns into a 3rd if Saad doesn’t re-sign in Boston.
2 sept. 2020 à 13 h 12
#8
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,667
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: shmoeman
I dont think Boston already gives up on Kase. Hes a really skilled player and I dont think theyll buy in too much on his performance after all the time off. No need to sell low


Quoting: bhavikp27
No thanks. And not sure why people think Bruins will trade Kase. He's looked good; just matter of time before he produces. Even though Saad is better right now, he makes $3.4M more (BOS have several free agents) and only has one year left.


The speculation on here confused me a bit too, especially given everything they gave up to get him. But if it made sense, I wanted to see what it might cost to get him. Like I said, I'm a big fan and I think he'll be a key piece for the Bruins moving forward if they keep him
bhavikp27 a aimé ceci.
2 sept. 2020 à 13 h 20
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,441
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
The speculation on here confused me a bit too, especially given everything they gave up to get him. But if it made sense, I wanted to see what it might cost to get him. Like I said, I'm a big fan and I think he'll be a key piece for the Bruins moving forward if they keep him


Yea i agree. Also think Saad with retention would be a really solid fit on the Bruins, could be a deadline deal if Kase continues to struggle but I think they end up keeping him for at least another half a year
ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
2 sept. 2020 à 13 h 35
#10
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,667
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: ChiHawk
Saad is a pretty big upgrade to Kase and that's no knock on Kase but more a testament to a very good player in Saad. Hawks should pass, Kase is not who they need on the first line.


Quoting: exo2769
I don't think it makes sense to trade Saad during the offseason. He'll garner at least a late 1st @ the TDL next year if the Hawks are out of it. If they're still in it....the Hawks will want Saad.


I'd say Saad is probably a bit better offensively, but Kase is much better at limiting the opposition shots and chances. I think the Hawks need that right now more than anything. Maybe it's just a structure thing and readjusting Saad's role would get him back to being a better defensive player; he has the tools to be better. But I'm not sure re-signing Saad is the best plan for this team and I don't think an offer like this (an offer I'd value higher that a late 1st straight up) would be available at the trade deadline. If this came around this offseason, I'd take it
2 sept. 2020 à 13 h 38
#11
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,667
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: MMBzFan
Sweeney needs his draft picks now. Already gave up a 1st to get rid of Backes. I’m ok with the trade of Kase but I would offer a prospect instead of a 2nd or the 2nd turns into a 3rd if Saad doesn’t re-sign in Boston.


Works for me too. I'll always take a prospect who looks promising their development over a pick that may or may not turn into a player. Unfortunately I think that the "this pick upgrades if a player re-signs" thing was outlawed by the newest CBA, which sucks because I think that would work well here
MMBzFan a aimé ceci.
2 sept. 2020 à 13 h 48
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,224
Mentions "j'aime": 9,590
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
I'd say Saad is probably a bit better offensively, but Kase is much better at limiting the opposition shots and chances. I think the Hawks need that right now more than anything. Maybe it's just a structure thing and readjusting Saad's role would get him back to being a better defensive player; he has the tools to be better. But I'm not sure re-signing Saad is the best plan for this team and I don't think an offer like this (an offer I'd value higher that a late 1st straight up) would be available at the trade deadline. If this came around this offseason, I'd take it


Saad is one of the better two way wingers in the game, definitely top 20, and known as a good defensive player and stronger on the puck. Saad had more blocks and they were even in takeaways with Saad less giveaways. Kase isn't bad, but Saad is simply a better winger hands down. He'll also likely sign a new deal for $4.5M for 5 is my guess.
2 sept. 2020 à 13 h 48
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 52
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I used to say the criticism of Kase being fragile/soft were overblown...I'm not so sure now.


Based on what? He's not fragile and he's no more or less soft than the bulk of the roster. Pasta and Krejci are the same level of physical as Kase.
2 sept. 2020 à 13 h 52
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,899
Mentions "j'aime": 18,617
Quoting: mattyb929
Based on what? He's not fragile and he's no more or less soft than the bulk of the roster. Pasta and Krejci are the same level of physical as Kase.


Based on what I saw in playoffs... skating circles around scrums, waiting for the puck to spit out, instead of going in and getting it himself.
2 sept. 2020 à 14 h 28
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,298
Mentions "j'aime": 668
Oh man I'd love this trade if were moving on from saad, really high on kase even if he hasnt looked amazing in boston.
ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
2 sept. 2020 à 15 h 28
#16
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,667
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: newman23
Oh man I'd love this trade if were moving on from saad, really high on kase even if he hasnt looked amazing in boston.


My thoughts exactly
2 sept. 2020 à 15 h 45
#17
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,667
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: ChiHawk
Saad is one of the better two way wingers in the game, definitely top 20, and known as a good defensive player and stronger on the puck. Saad had more blocks and they were even in takeaways with Saad less giveaways. Kase isn't bad, but Saad is simply a better winger hands down. He'll also likely sign a new deal for $4.5M for 5 is my guess.


I think he's solid as well, but defensively I honestly think Kase is better. His relative Corsi and expected goals against numbers over the last three seasons are much better than Saad's, his rates of takeaways and blocks per 60 minutes are actually noticeably higher than Saad's are and Kase's has over seven more expected defensive goals above replacement than Saad does, again over the last three seasons. I don't know how much of that can be attributed to the bad team around Saad and how much is on him, but most metrics point to Kase being superior for the time being. I've never watched a lot of Kase, so I can't say with certainty if he's better defensively or not, but the numbers definitely point to it being the case.

Saad is definitely better offensively -- he is really strong on the puck and creates a lot of high quality scoring opportunities. Kase does much the same actually, but not on the same level. I also think Saad has a higher ceiling offensively and maybe even defensively too. It's just been awhile since he's actually hit that ceiling.
2 sept. 2020 à 16 h 9
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,224
Mentions "j'aime": 9,590
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
I think he's solid as well, but defensively I honestly think Kase is better. His relative Corsi and expected goals against numbers over the last three seasons are much better than Saad's, his rates of takeaways and blocks per 60 minutes are actually noticeably higher than Saad's are and Kase's has over seven more expected defensive goals above replacement than Saad does, again over the last three seasons. I don't know how much of that can be attributed to the bad team around Saad and how much is on him, but most metrics point to Kase being superior for the time being. I've never watched a lot of Kase, so I can't say with certainty if he's better defensively or not, but the numbers definitely point to it being the case.

Saad is definitely better offensively -- he is really strong on the puck and creates a lot of high quality scoring opportunities. Kase does much the same actually, but not on the same level. I also think Saad has a higher ceiling offensively and maybe even defensively too. It's just been awhile since he's actually hit that ceiling.


I think you would have to watch Kase and yes, a lot of the metrics your are pointing to are a result of playing on a better defensive team. Also, not sure where you are getting that it's been awhile since saad has hit that ceiling; he had a far superior takeaway to giveaway ratio and matching some of his best years. He was on pace for 30 goals had it not been for the stoppage of the season; his best was 31 goals in his career.

Kase is just not a 1st liner that will drive play and possession. Comparing one to the other, which I'd argue is a fool's errand, Saad is simply a better player hands down. Adding Kase would be nice, but in a middle 6 role, not a first line role and as such, would leaving a huge hole on the first line that Saad fills nicely.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage