SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

BUF and COL trades

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 3 juin 2020
Publié: 3 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 250 000 $
21 250 000 $
21 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
79 500 000 $
16 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Mittelstadt, Casey [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
Détails additionnels:
2021 first round pick is top 3 protected.
BUF
  1. Smith, Zack
  2. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
2.
CHI
  1. Byram, Bowen
  2. Jost, Tyson [Droits de RFA]
COL
  1. DeBrincat, Alex
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
2021 second round round pick upgrades to a first round pick if Chicago makes the playoffs. Additionally this pick will be the lower of the BUF and Chicago picks.
3.
CHI
ANA
  1. Seabrook, Brent
  2. Shaw, Andrew
Détails additionnels:
CBO/Retire
4.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de BUF
Logo de WPG
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2277 500 000 $64 303 706 $1 090 244 $7 632 500 $13 196 294 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 juin 2020 à 5 h 49
#26
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: Richard88
It's not such a crazy proposal.

Value-wise a 2nd on its own is not enough to offset the value difference between Byram/DeBrincat, particularly as Jost is worth more than just a 2nd on his own (i.e. 2nd + 3rd), so I think the add would need to be more than just a 2nd to balance the trade. Or just take Jost out completely.

Byram is still only a prospect, whereas DeBrincat is a young 40 goal scorer signed at a good $6.4m caphit until 2023. That said, Byram plays the significantly more important position and is much harder to replace, so I don't think Colorado does this. If a trade involving DeBrincat were to happen it would be more suitable to include Newhook+ instead of Byram, but then that doesn't really make sense for Chicago as they'd be better off sticking with the proven asset.


Obviously Byram is still just a prospect but aren't all great players before they're in the league? Not comparing the two but McDavid had never played a game in the NHL but I don't think Edmonton would've traded that 1st overall pick for anything. If you're good at hockey, it translates. Byram is projected to be a top pairing dman and they wouldn't trade that for a 2nd liner coming off a weak season. Also 6.4M is still a lot when compared to a 925k ELC
4 juin 2020 à 5 h 52
#27
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Obviously Byram is still just a prospect but aren't all great players before they're in the league? Not comparing the two but McDavid had never played a game in the NHL but I don't think Edmonton would've traded that 1st overall pick for anything. If you're good at hockey, it translates. Byram is projected to be a top pairing dman and they wouldn't trade that for a 2nd liner coming off a weak season. Also 6.4M is still a lot when compared to a 925k ELC


I agree.

The only type of forward that I would realistically consider trading Byram for is someone like Connor who is:

1) A proven top line scorer (i.e. 3 seasons of 30+ goals);
2) Young; and
3) Cost-controlled / good contract with term.

But even then it would take a lot of thinking as it's not an easy decision.
4 juin 2020 à 5 h 57
#28
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: Richard88
I agree.

The only type of forward that I would realistically consider trading Byram for is someone like Connor who is:

1) A proven top line scorer (i.e. 3 seasons of 30+ goals);
2) Young; and
3) Cost-controlled / good contract with term.

But even then it would take a lot of thinking as it's not an easy decision.


I don't even think they'd do it for that. Value wise it makes sense but I really think Sakic is trying to hold onto these elite young players. Eichel is the only player I can think of that would actually be traded to Colorado with Byram as apart of the return
Richard88 et Xqb15 a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2020 à 6 h 1
#29
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
I don't even think they'd do it for that. Value wise it makes sense but I really think Sakic is trying to hold onto these elite young players. Eichel is the only player I can think of that would actually be traded to Colorado with Byram as apart of the return


Yeah, I think you're right. If the cap had risen then it would have been a consideration, but if the cap stays flat then players on ELC's will be even more valuable than usual. Not to mention exemption from the Expansion Draft.
4 juin 2020 à 6 h 2
#30
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: Richard88
Yeah, I think you're right. If the cap had risen then it would have been a consideration, but if the cap stays flat then players on ELC's will be even more valuable than usual. Not to mention exemption from the Expansion Draft.


Its really crazy whats happening with the cap and this expansion draft. GMs need to be smarter than ever with how competitive most of the league is
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2020 à 9 h 37
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 2,586
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Quoting: HatterTParty
Respect. That’s a great core. No need to trade a stud like byram, I’m still pissed we passed on him. Burnaby Joe has really brought this team back to contender status.

Also, quick question. I noticed landeskog wasn’t in your core. Was that due to his age or just the thought that he won’t be around in the next 5 years or so?


For me Landeskog is just on the fringe of it and if you expanded it pass 6 he is part of it. But yes age imo plays part of it, as does production and contract. Newhook again this is just my opinion is going to be a ppg C in the NHL and that potential supersedes what Landeskog is right now. And by no means is any of this a knock on Landy, I still think he is one of the best 2 way forwards in the NHL, and is a great captain.
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2020 à 12 h 9
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Tag me, quote me, respond to me... Don't need to be a smart ass buddy. Not crying, just not interested in conversing with someone that likes to not fully read comments and make uneducated and untrue points. Thanks for listening


Not being a smart ass, just never heard the term "tag me" but then again, I'm not on social media so wouldn't know the latest terms floating around.

We can continue to debate which is 100% fine by me, I'm okay with people have differences in opinions and I'm certainly not offended when someone is direct and verbose.
4 juin 2020 à 12 h 17
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
Quoting: Richard88
I agree.

The only type of forward that I would realistically consider trading Byram for is someone like Connor who is:

1) A proven top line scorer (i.e. 3 seasons of 30+ goals);
2) Young; and
3) Cost-controlled / good contract with term.

But even then it would take a lot of thinking as it's not an easy decision.


Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
I don't even think they'd do it for that. Value wise it makes sense but I really think Sakic is trying to hold onto these elite young players. Eichel is the only player I can think of that would actually be traded to Colorado with Byram as apart of the return


Obviously Byram is not returning Connor or Eichel. Byram's ceiling is a 1st line but how many top 10 or top 10 picks don't actually hit their ceiling? Roughly 2/3rd's? Go back historically and see what they said about players versus what they've done today...Strome and Nylander are both good examples on the Hawks. Doesn't mean they are bad players but they haven't and likely won't hit the prospect ceiling they were labeled with. As such, no team in their right mind is going to trade a top 20 forward in the league with term for Byram regardless if defense is considered more valuable. However, which is what I think you meant, he could be part of a package that that grabs a Eichel type of player.

I like Byram but believe he is also overrated in what was a weaker draft year last year for D unlike the year prior where Byram IMO would have gone in the middle of the top 5 D guys.
4 juin 2020 à 12 h 19
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: ChiHawk
Depends what's coming back. Top NHL players don't grow on trees but top prospects who never reach their ceilings do.


Debrincat isn’t a top nhl player, hes good but he is coming off a 45 point season. Right now his 70 point season looks like the outlier and he’s more a 50 point guy

Doesn’t move the needle for avs to abandon their future d core for the next decade, especially with avs having Newhook on the way who could just be like debrincat or better
4 juin 2020 à 12 h 21
#35
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Richard88
It's not such a crazy proposal.

Value-wise a 2nd on its own is not enough to offset the value difference between Byram/DeBrincat, particularly as Jost is worth more than just a 2nd on his own (i.e. 2nd + 3rd), so I think the add would need to be more than just a 2nd to balance the trade. Or just take Jost out completely.

Byram is still only a prospect, whereas DeBrincat is a young 40 goal scorer signed at a good $6.4m caphit until 2023. That said, Byram plays the significantly more important position and is much harder to replace, so I don't think Colorado does this. If a trade involving DeBrincat were to happen it would be more suitable to include Newhook+ instead of Byram, but then that doesn't really make sense for Chicago as they'd be better off sticking with the proven asset.


He is coming off a 45 point season, he doesn’t move the needle dude. Avs have Newhook coming as well, who is better defensively that the cat and can play in that role

Debrincat doesn’t offer anything the avs don’t already have and you don’t have to trade byram for him
4 juin 2020 à 12 h 26
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
Modifié 4 juin 2020 à 13 h 12
Quoting: coga16
Debrincat isn’t a top nhl player, hes good but he is coming off a 45 point season. Right now his 70 point season looks like the outlier and he’s more a 50 point guy

Doesn’t move the needle for avs to abandon their future d core for the next decade, especially with avs having Newhook on the way who could just be like debrincat or better


Oh I'm not suggesting Cat is a top 20 player, I was referring to the other posters mentioning Eichel or Connor.

Regarding Cat, he was on pace for a 53 point season. I think Cat is going to be a 55 to 65 point player. Hard to say at 22 years old and 3 seasons what is and isn't a outlier.

I'm one of the rare Hawks fans who is a HUGE Cat fan...I believe he's a great sniper and damn good at doing that, but I'm not going to pretend he will ever be a top 20 forward in the league. Top 50 sure. I wouldn't however trade Cat for Newhook. Unproven assets more often then not won't ever hit their ceilings.
4 juin 2020 à 16 h 47
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,663
Mentions "j'aime": 1,627
Quoting: coga16
You’re not getting byram, simple


Just ask them for dach and Boqvist
4 juin 2020 à 17 h 27
#38
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,848
Mentions "j'aime": 5,824
Quoting: KINGS67
Just ask them for dach and Boqvist

Dach should be = or better (in trade value) than Byram with how he did this year.
4 juin 2020 à 17 h 44
#39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,663
Mentions "j'aime": 1,627
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Dach should be = or better (in trade value) than Byram with how he did this year.


Fair.
5 juin 2020 à 1 h 20
#40
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Dach should be = or better (in trade value) than Byram with how he did this year.


Are you trading dach for anyone coming off a 45 point season on pace for 50 points?

No? Oh ok then this convo is over
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage