SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Different scenario - moves with TOR FLA TB EDM

Créé par: justaBoss
Équipe: 2020-21 Stars de Dallas
Date de création initiale: 3 juin 2020
Publié: 3 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If the team fails completely in the playoffs, I think it would be time to make some acute changes to the team core, and start to think about the future of the team.

Logic behind the trades:

TOR trade - a blockbuster that fits to both teams' needs. DAL needs a young and skilled RW in Nylander, and they also lack RHD prospects and picks. TOR needs a cheap first pair RHD and a defensive center in Faksa, and they also get two future assets in Robertson and Honka.

FLA trade - FLA is in need of wingers if Hoffman and Dadonov walk, and their LHDs are also tad weak. In this way, Radulov and Oleksiak fit right to the team. However their owners have made clear that they need to save some money as well, so DAL agrees to take a subpar contract of Strålmans, with the addition of Saarela and two decent picks - which are assets DAL is lacking.

TB trade - Johns is about to hit free agency, so getting a good value him via trade should be done now. TBs are thin in RHDs but they're loaded with forwards. In a vacuum Johnson holds more value than Johns, but TB is also very much cap strapped, which probably makes them consider a swap as such as it fits to their needs pretty well and saves them close to $3M in cap.

EDM trade - basically a prospect swap. EDM receives a nice and big LW prospect that has a potential to become mid-to-top6 power forward, while DAL receives a good RW prospect who has lost his touch with EDM.

BUF trade - don't mind it. Just wanted that 7th rounder back lol.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
1925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 333 333 $
33 000 000 $
1787 500 $
1735 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
Transactions
1.
DAL
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. Nylander, William
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
TOR
2.
DAL
  1. Saarela, Aleksi [Droits de RFA]
  2. Strålman, Anton
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (FLA)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Oleksiak, Jamie
  2. Radulov, Alexander
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
3.
4.
DAL
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Liste de réserve]
EDM
  1. Eriksson, Albin [Liste de réserve]
5.
DAL
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (DAL)
BUF
  1. Brinkman, Ben [Liste de réserve]
Détails additionnels:
2019 6th round pick (173rd overall)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de DAL
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
2021
Logo de DAL
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
2022
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $82 581 064 $3 047 866 $2 900 000 $-1 081 064 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 850 000 $9 850 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
C
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
787 500 $787 500 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Stars de Dallas
738 333 $738 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Stars de Dallas
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
737 500 $737 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
700 000 $700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 0
#1
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,280
Mentions "j'aime": 9,215
Looks good to me, I like that trade from the leafs perspective. But is Johns worth Johnson? I’m not sure.
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 1
#2
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,280
Mentions "j'aime": 9,215
By the way, I wouldn’t put Lili 2nd pairing. Sign someone or keep Oleksiak.
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 2
#3
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,726
Mentions "j'aime": 31,451
Quoting: Saskleaf
Looks good to me, I like that trade from the leafs perspective. But is Johns worth Johnson? I’m not sure.


Me neither, but figured that since TB must save money and they're thin on RHDs and pretty heavy with wingers, it could be beneficial enough for both teams.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 3
#4
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,280
Mentions "j'aime": 9,215
Quoting: justaBoss
Me neither, but figured that since TB must save money and they're thin on RHDs and pretty heavy with wingers, it could be beneficial enough for both teams.


I agree they might move him. But not sure that is the trade.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 12
#5
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
I don't see why TOR should make this move...

Klingberg is yet another offensive d-man and we all saw that this didn't work out with Barrie, learn from your mistakes
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 12
#6
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,726
Mentions "j'aime": 31,451
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
I don't see why TOR should make this move...

Klingberg is yet another offensive d-man and we all saw that this didn't work out with Barrie, learn from your mistakes


Shhh don't tell them that sarcasm
SlevinKalevra a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 15
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 2,924
Mentions "j'aime": 1,501
Looks like Albin Eriksson flopped badly this year highly doubt the Oilers take that 1 for 1
CD282 a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 19
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,087
Mentions "j'aime": 7,771
Quoting: Bluetomorrow83
Looks like Albin Eriksson flopped badly this year highly doubt the Oilers take that 1 for 1


Yup. The value isn't close. Dallas would have to add their 1st for Holland to bite.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 19
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,286
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
I think Toronto is over paying. Klinger and JRob equals Nylander and Gren. Nylander has extra term remaining but Klinger has that yummy low cap hit. Faksa and Honka does not equal a first round pick. I’d say drop it to a third round pick. I like the idea of that trade tho. Just depends if Toronto gets so excited about getting a big name they forget he isn’t really what they need (looks at Nill and Pavs contract)
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 22
#10
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,726
Mentions "j'aime": 31,451
Quoting: CD282
Yup. The value isn't close. Dallas would have to add their 1st for Holland to bite.


Yeah f*ck that.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 22
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,286
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
Quoting: Bluetomorrow83
Looks like Albin Eriksson flopped badly this year highly doubt the Oilers take that 1 for 1


He was always a risk/reward guy. The toolbox is there. He could be a stud. He could be a bust. I think the Stars would be smart to keep him and be patient. I think the Oilers would be smart to get more of a sure thing for PoolParty
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 23
#12
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,726
Mentions "j'aime": 31,451
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
I think Toronto is over paying. Klinger and JRob equals Nylander and Gren. Nylander has extra term remaining but Klinger has that yummy low cap hit. Faksa and Honka does not equal a first round pick. I’d say drop it to a third round pick. I like the idea of that trade tho. Just depends if Toronto gets so excited about getting a big name they forget he isn’t really what they need (looks at Nill and Pavs contract)


3rd is imo too low. If first is too hefty, maybe a 2nd+3rd then.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 24
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,286
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
I can’t decide how I feel about the Florida deal. Seems like fair value but that Stralman contract is rough
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 25
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,810
Mentions "j'aime": 5,290
Oof, I think that'd be a no from the Leafs.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 26
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 55
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Dubas is assassinated
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 27
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,286
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
Quoting: justaBoss
3rd is imo too low. If first is too hefty, maybe a 2nd+3rd then.


I was leaning towards a second. But I feel like Nylander has a little more value than Klinger. I guess in a deal like that the picks come down the GMs having a similar back and forth to ours lol
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 29
#17
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,726
Mentions "j'aime": 31,451
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
I was leaning towards a second. But I feel like Nylander has a little more value than Klinger. I guess in a deal like that the picks come down the GMs having a similar back and forth to ours lol


Imo they're fairly equal. Kling has the position and cap advantage while Nylander has the term and age.

I personally believe that Robertson+Honka = Liljegren, and Faksa = low first. Defensive C's at his level are extremely hard to find. But I'd settle for 2nd and 3rd.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 29
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,087
Mentions "j'aime": 7,771
Quoting: justaBoss
Yeah f*ck that.


Goodbye then.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 31
#19
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,726
Mentions "j'aime": 31,451
Quoting: CD282
Goodbye then.


Gladly.

You can stick up with the bust player that'll never play for your team.

At least there'll be two losers here.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 32
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,286
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
Quoting: justaBoss
Imo they're fairly equal. Kling has the position and cap advantage while Nylander has the term and age.

I personally believe that Robertson+Honka = Liljegren, and Faksa = low first. Defensive C's at his level are extremely hard to find. But I'd settle for 2nd and 3rd.


Fair. Fox is a stud but I don’t know if his value in the league is quite that high. If Robertson and Honks gets you Gren, then do that and shop Klinger elsewhere
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 34
#21
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,726
Mentions "j'aime": 31,451
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Fair. Fox is a stud but I don’t know if his value in the league is quite that high. If Robertson and Honks gets you Gren, then do that and shop Klinger elsewhere


Meh. I'd rather just keep both Robertson and see how good he could become.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 37
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,087
Mentions "j'aime": 7,771
Quoting: justaBoss
Gladly.

You can stick up with the bust player that'll never play for your team.

At least there'll be two losers here.


LOL. If 3 points in 29 SHL games isn't "loser", I don't know what is.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 40
#23
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,726
Mentions "j'aime": 31,451
Quoting: CD282
LOL. If 3 points in 29 SHL games isn't "loser", I don't know what is.


The guy is 19. And just last year he got 16 in 44 games. Give him some slack.

The idea behind the move is that this "loser" as you put it could be a good asset for you. There's a chance that he might be beneficial for you.

Pulju won't be that. He won't even sign with your team lol.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 44
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,087
Mentions "j'aime": 7,771
Quoting: justaBoss
The guy is 19. And just last year he got 16 in 44 games. Give him some slack.

The idea behind the move is that this "loser" as you put it could be a good asset for you. There's a chance that he might be beneficial for you.

Pulju won't be that. He won't even sign with your team lol.


Eriksson isn't a "good asset" though, that's the part you aren't grasping. Add the first or delete the trade.
3 juin 2020 à 21 h 45
#25
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,726
Mentions "j'aime": 31,451
Quoting: CD282
Eriksson isn't a "good asset" though, that's the part you aren't grasping. Add the first or delete the trade.


In what world would any team give up a 1st for a player that won't sign with the team that owns his rights? EDM has very little leverage regarding the guy. They have two real options here, sell him underpriced or wait for his rights to expire...
C_M_O_R a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage