SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

with pierre

Créé par: Emoon
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 12 févr. 2020
Publié: 12 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1925 000 $
1775 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
45 750 000 $
Transactions
ANA
  1. Bracco, Jeremy [Droits de RFA]
  2. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
  3. Johnsson, Andreas
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2384 000 000 $80 538 116 $0 $400 000 $3 461 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 févr. 2020 à 13 h 4
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 252
Mentions "j'aime": 62
I'd be surprised if Mikheyev takes that little on another one yr deal. I think he's showed enough to at least make Engvall money, if not more...
12 févr. 2020 à 13 h 5
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,797
Mentions "j'aime": 564
I don't think Muzzin takes 4 years. That puts him at 35 if he wants another contract, which reduces his value. I bet he'd take 2 and then hit UFA again.

Mikheyev gets more then that or goes back to Russia. Same problem they had with Zaitsev.
12 févr. 2020 à 13 h 5
#3
#LeafsFever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,787
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Truth of the matter is, whether Anaheim fans believe it or not, Josh Manson is NOT worth Johnsson AND Dermott, nevermind that extra stuff. These are 2 young NHL roster players, great speed from both, and both have displayed plenty of top-6 and top-4 potential, respectively. Josh Manson fits the Leafs well for obvious reasons, but he's not and will never be a top pairing guy, and I think people fail to understand that just because you'd slot Manson with Rielly, that doesn't make him more than what he actually is. So, even if the Leafs have to overpay for Manson. Johnsson and Dermott together in a deal for only Manson back, would be a pretty significant stretch. Never mind the fact that the Leafs probably could get better value for those players elsewhere.
12 févr. 2020 à 13 h 9
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,146
Mentions "j'aime": 5,954
Ducks pass, Mid six winger, an LD (we have an abundance of) and a prospect that will never be in the NHL with a third 2 years from now doesnt even move the needle for Manson

Quoting: MG1986
Truth of the matter is, whether Anaheim fans believe it or not, Josh Manson is NOT worth Johnsson AND Dermott, nevermind that extra stuff. These are 2 young NHL roster players, great speed from both, and both have displayed plenty of top-6 and top-4 potential, respectively. Josh Manson fits the Leafs well for obvious reasons, but he's not and will never be a top pairing guy, and I think people fail to understand that just because you'd slot Manson with Rielly, that doesn't make him more than what he actually is. So, even if the Leafs have to overpay for Manson. Johnsson and Dermott together in a deal for only Manson back, would be a pretty significant stretch. Never mind the fact that the Leafs probably could get better value for those players elsewhere.


AJ is a mid six winger not anything more, we have no need for Dermott we are more than set at LD

This deal doesn't move the needle at all for the Ducks, both teams needs matter not just the leafs contrary to popular belief on this site
awatt a aimé ceci.
12 févr. 2020 à 13 h 19
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,133
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Just forget the whole Manson trade, so not worth it, Anaheim still thinks they're competitive (clearly they are not), send both or one of Johnsson or Dermott somewhere else for fair value, Sign Demelo for free at 3/4 x 5 years he's 2 years younger is better and costs nothing to aquire
12 févr. 2020 à 13 h 23
#6
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,626
Quoting: FantasySens
I'd be surprised if Mikheyev takes that little on another one yr deal. I think he's showed enough to at least make Engvall money, if not more...


Hes only played 39 games so far. I wouldn't bet on him coming back this season either so he wont be able to ask for that much.
12 févr. 2020 à 13 h 25
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,146
Mentions "j'aime": 5,954
Quoting: Boomer125
Just forget the whole Manson trade, so not worth it, Anaheim still thinks they're competitive (clearly they are not), send both or one of Johnsson or Dermott somewhere else for fair value, Sign Demelo for free at 3/4 x 5 years he's 2 years younger is better and costs nothing to aquire


It has nothing to do about being competitive, its about properly rebuilding and trading assets away for things we need, not things we have an abundance of
12 févr. 2020 à 13 h 27
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 887
Mentions "j'aime": 334
Quoting: Jack_
Hes only played 39 games so far. I wouldn't bet on him coming back this season either so he wont be able to ask for that much.


I know it’s his wrist which doesn’t affect his skating, but he has been skating which leads me to believe he will at least try to come back for the post season. 🤞🏼
12 févr. 2020 à 13 h 28
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,592
Mentions "j'aime": 19,712
Quoting: MG1986
Truth of the matter is, whether Anaheim fans believe it or not, Josh Manson is NOT worth Johnsson AND Dermott, nevermind that extra stuff. These are 2 young NHL roster players, great speed from both, and both have displayed plenty of top-6 and top-4 potential, respectively. Josh Manson fits the Leafs well for obvious reasons, but he's not and will never be a top pairing guy, and I think people fail to understand that just because you'd slot Manson with Rielly, that doesn't make him more than what he actually is. So, even if the Leafs have to overpay for Manson. Johnsson and Dermott together in a deal for only Manson back, would be a pretty significant stretch. Never mind the fact that the Leafs probably could get better value for those players elsewhere.


Ducks dont really care if you think Manson isnt worth AJ and Dermott. Both of those players are useless in Anaheim. Johnsson is not better then Rakell or Silfverberg and probably wont be noticeably better then Comtois, Kase, Zegras, Terry, Tracey, Lundstrom. Dermott is certainly not better then Fowler or Lindholm and wont be noticeably better then Guhle, Larsson, Mahura, LaCombe.
12 févr. 2020 à 13 h 48
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,133
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Quoting: Salzy
It has nothing to do about being competitive, its about properly rebuilding and trading assets away for things we need, not things we have an abundance of


I understand the concept, my point is Anaheim really needs everything except Top 4 LHD and a Starting Goalie, everything else is just meh. I don't see a trade out there that involves Manson or Rackell that takes Anaheim up a level, if they chose to move either player it's a re build move not a re tool move and IMO the needs become less of a concern and I'd want the best available deal overall over a specific need.
12 févr. 2020 à 13 h 53
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,133
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Ducks dont really care if you think Manson isnt worth AJ and Dermott. Both of those players are useless in Anaheim. Johnsson is not better then Rakell or Silfverberg and probably wont be noticeably better then Comtois, Kase, Zegras, Terry, Tracey, Lundstrom. Dermott is certainly not better then Fowler or Lindholm and wont be noticeably better then Guhle, Larsson, Mahura, LaCombe.


You're 50% correct, Johnsson won't be better than Rackell or Silfverberg (but he's close to Silfverberg) but he will be and is better than everything else you mentioned at the moment.
Dermott will not unseat Fowler or Lindholm but he could make them expendable assets that would bring in healthy quality returns. It's all about the goal here, pretty much everyone believes or thinks the best thing for Anaheim is a rebuild except Anaheim and their fans
12 févr. 2020 à 14 h 22
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,592
Mentions "j'aime": 19,712
Quoting: Boomer125
You're 50% correct, Johnsson won't be better than Rackell or Silfverberg (but he's close to Silfverberg) but he will be and is better than everything else you mentioned at the moment.
Dermott will not unseat Fowler or Lindholm but he could make them expendable assets that would bring in healthy quality returns. It's all about the goal here, pretty much everyone believes or thinks the best thing for Anaheim is a rebuild except Anaheim and their fans


Im not a fan of Anaheim lol. Screw the ducks, they can be bottom feeders for 6 years for all I care. However I am someone who despite not being a fan of a team can still see where their strengths and weaknesses are. I never said that those prospects the Ducks currently have are better or necessarily will be better (some will though like Zegras). I said the difference between them won't be noticeable by the time Anaheim is ready to compete again. The same way Johnsson is only really being shopped because the Leafs wont find a #2 defense available at under 1M for Mikhayev (who is essentially an unnoticeable difference from Johnsson).
As it's been stated many times, Anaheim's biggest hole is their RD depth there is a very high chance that if they draft in the 3-6 range this year they will take Drysdale. Trading their only viable right defenseman Manson without even getting a right defense prospect back but instead getting pieces back that you dont need is very very poor asset management
12 févr. 2020 à 14 h 36
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 252
Mentions "j'aime": 62
Quoting: Jack_
Hes only played 39 games so far. I wouldn't bet on him coming back this season either so he wont be able to ask for that much.


Engvalls only played 35 games and he got 1.25...what's your point Jack?
12 févr. 2020 à 14 h 44
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,133
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Quoting: FantasySens
I'd be surprised if Mikheyev takes that little on another one yr deal. I think he's showed enough to at least make Engvall money, if not more...


Quoting: Jack_
Hes only played 39 games so far. I wouldn't bet on him coming back this season either so he wont be able to ask for that much.


Quoting: FantasySens
Engvalls only played 35 games and he got 1.25...what's your point Jack?


Mikhayev will get a Hyman contract 2,250,000 x 2 maybe 3 if Leafs are lucky
12 févr. 2020 à 14 h 49
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,133
Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Im not a fan of Anaheim lol. Screw the ducks, they can be bottom feeders for 6 years for all I care. However I am someone who despite not being a fan of a team can still see where their strengths and weaknesses are. I never said that those prospects the Ducks currently have are better or necessarily will be better (some will though like Zegras). I said the difference between them won't be noticeable by the time Anaheim is ready to compete again. The same way Johnsson is only really being shopped because the Leafs wont find a #2 defense available at under 1M for Mikhayev (who is essentially an unnoticeable difference from Johnsson).
As it's been stated many times, Anaheim's biggest hole is their RD depth there is a very high chance that if they draft in the 3-6 range this year they will take Drysdale. Trading their only viable right defenseman Manson without even getting a right defense prospect back but instead getting pieces back that you dont need is very very poor asset management


I agree, the trade proposed above doesn't get anything started, I'd be very surprised if Anaheim got anything close to their asking price unless of course some team needs a 2nd pair RHD and has 2 or more top RHD prospects that are 2 years out to spare along with the 1st rnder , I just don't see it, to be honest I'd be looking moving Rackell for help in RHD as he will get a top prospect or DeAngelo out of NYR then proceed toove Manson for the Middle Forward and late 1st he's worth
12 févr. 2020 à 14 h 50
#16
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,626
Quoting: FantasySens
Engvalls only played 35 games and he got 1.25...what's your point Jack?


That he won't get much more then that. Engvall also isnt coming off a serious injury
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage