SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

which wingers will actually get a 1st at TDL

Créé par: Subbanator7667
Équipe: 2019-20 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 20 janv. 2020
Publié: 20 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I Have seen a bunch of ACGMs from teams thinking their player will get a 1st plus a prospect, so below are all the wingers who may actually be available this trade deadline, I put them in tiers of who I think carries the most value, but looking for peoples opinions

Top line are the wingers I think have the most trade value


Second line is a below in value and so and so on
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $62 644 643 $0 $0 $18 855 357 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
350 000 $350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 857 143 $2 857 143 $
C, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 937 500 $2 937 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 janv. 2020 à 14 h 11
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,800
Mentions "j'aime": 25,381
This is hard because you included guys with term. So how does a Palmieri vs Kreider stack up since Palmieri has an extra year lol
DakotaMermis4Norris a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 14 h 14
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,913
Mentions "j'aime": 6,303
Anyone with a "UFA-1" on their tile is not worth a 1st round pick this year. Zucker, Palmieri, AA, and Tatar are the only guys on this list that you could make an argument for a 1st in return value, IMO.
DakotaMermis4Norris a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 14 h 16
#3
Démarrer sujet
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,855
Mentions "j'aime": 3,682
Quoting: csick
This is hard because you included guys with term. So how does a Palmieri vs Kreider stack up since Palmieri has an extra year lol


See and that's whats difficult for me to, because I see people posting Kreider trades for a 1st and good prospect when teams can probably get Zucker or Tatar with term for that and a lil bit more so wanted to see how people valued them
csick a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 14 h 17
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Zucker, Palms, Tatar, and maybe Coleman are the only guys I'd consider giving a first for (on here) though I wouldn't be mad if one of my teams gave a first for Toffoli or Gusev, I just think they can be had for less (sry OTT NYR and DET fans... I would not give a first for Kreider AA or JGP...)
20 janv. 2020 à 14 h 18
#5
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,800
Mentions "j'aime": 25,381
Quoting: AFOX10900
Zucker, Palms, Tatar, and maybe Coleman are the only guys I'd consider giving a first for (on here) though I wouldn't be mad if one of my teams gave a first for Toffoli or Gusev, I just think they can be had for less (sry OTT NYR and DET fans... I would not give a first for Kreider AA or JGP...)


AA isn't a rental
DakotaMermis4Norris a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 14 h 20
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: csick
AA isn't a rental


Yeah, i still wouldn't give a first for him, he had a career year last year, and every sign points to him never reaching close to that level again, he brings speed, which is useful, but that's about it
20 janv. 2020 à 14 h 21
#7
Démarrer sujet
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,855
Mentions "j'aime": 3,682
Quoting: AFOX10900
Yeah, i still wouldn't give a first for him, he had a career year last year, and every sign points to him never reaching close to that level again, he brings speed, which is useful, but that's about it


Got into a debate with a Det fan that was trying to convince me that he was more valuable then Trochek, Im not nearly that high on AA to even give up a 1st for him
Dan10900 et DakotaMermis4Norris a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 14 h 23
#8
its been a pleasure
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,986
Mentions "j'aime": 8,616
How did Sissons get 7 years
20 janv. 2020 à 14 h 26
#9
arky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 6,761
Mentions "j'aime": 4,370
Quoting: Subbanator7667
Got into a debate with a Det fan that was trying to convince me that he was more valuable then Trochek, Im not nearly that high on AA to even give up a 1st for him


Though I agree Trocheck is a better player. AA has two years of cost control and I really believe the injury he had at the start of the season never really healed and he was never 100%.

Would I give up a 1st for him but he is intriguing and needs to be watched over the next year and half.
20 janv. 2020 à 14 h 31
#10
torontos finest
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,590
Mentions "j'aime": 11,268
I think these are the guys who can be traded with the first as the key asset:
-Tatar
-Zucker
-Kreider
-Palmieri
-Tierney
-Coleman
DakotaMermis4Norris a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 14 h 35
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,676
Mentions "j'aime": 6,811
I think more importantly is, how many teams are willing to give up 1sts this year? That number is maybe 3-4 max IMO. Some guys above may be worth 1sts but might not get one just because there are so few teams willing to give up their 1sts.

An alternative to your question could be, how may of these guys are worth the equivalent of a 1st this year? That may be more pertinent because for example if the Habs don't get a 1st for Tatar, i'd be perfectly happy with an offer from Dallas of a guy like Harley.......... Doesn't have to be a 1st round pick.
Subbanator7667 a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 14 h 37
#12
Beanmachine
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,489
Mentions "j'aime": 502
Quoting: mondo
I think these are the guys who can be traded with the first as the key asset:
-Tatar
-Zucker
-Kreider
-Palmieri
-Tierney
-Coleman


People need to remember that Mark Stone got a top end prospect and an unconditional 2nd ( and a plug player) and none of those guys above is Mark Stone. Everyone over values their trade chips on this site - I will be amazed if any of the UFA's listed above bring in a first unless it is in the 26-30 range!

The Tatars Zuckers and Palimeris with term should fetch a 1st and b prospects or a top tier prospect and a 2nd or 3rd depending on prospect
CD282 et DakotaMermis4Norris a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 14 h 44
#13
Make it Work
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 772
Mentions "j'aime": 175
You could argue that the UFA-1 guys if they were to resign with the team who gets them, the 2nd rounder (should they be worth that) gets moved to a 1st but it most likely wouldn't be for this years draft but in 2021.
20 janv. 2020 à 14 h 51
#14
torontos finest
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,590
Mentions "j'aime": 11,268
Quoting: F50marco
An alternative to your question could be, how may of these guys are worth the equivalent of a 1st this year? That may be more pertinent because for example if the Habs don't get a 1st for Tatar, i'd be perfectly happy with an offer from Dallas of a guy like Harley.......... Doesn't have to be a 1st round pick.


I probably should've stated in my post that the guys I mentioned are worth a 1st or equivalent. It's much more a matter of who actually offers for the players and who is willing to give up assets to the acquire the player.

Quoting: InTreWeTrust
People need to remember that Mark Stone got a top end prospect and an unconditional 2nd ( and a plug player) and none of those guys above is Mark Stone. Everyone over values their trade chips on this site - I will be amazed if any of the UFA's listed above bring in a first unless it is in the 26-30 range!

The Tatars Zuckers and Palimeris with term should fetch a 1st and b prospects or a top tier prospect and a 2nd or 3rd depending on prospect


People need to remember that Mark Stone railroaded the Senators into a trade with Vegas. It's almost as if every NHL trade has some context behind it, and saying a list of players is worth a first is the "baseline" estimate for how much they would go for assuming reasonable demand.

All these players are productive forwards and teams that are looking to go deep into the playoffs; if several teams are offering for a certain player they will more than likely put their first up in the hopes that is within the 26-30.
20 janv. 2020 à 15 h 39
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 562
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: csick
This is hard because you included guys with term. So how does a Palmieri vs Kreider stack up since Palmieri has an extra year lol


i was thinking the same thing, also i would argue palmieri is worth more as point production is similar but palmieri scores more
20 janv. 2020 à 15 h 43
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 562
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: InTreWeTrust
People need to remember that Mark Stone got a top end prospect and an unconditional 2nd ( and a plug player) and none of those guys above is Mark Stone. Everyone over values their trade chips on this site - I will be amazed if any of the UFA's listed above bring in a first unless it is in the 26-30 range!

The Tatars Zuckers and Palimeris with term should fetch a 1st and b prospects or a top tier prospect and a 2nd or 3rd depending on prospect


right but brannstrom was the equivalent of a 1st+, meaning he is worth more than vegas's first. i agree with your whole point, just clarifying fetching a first is not equal to stones brannstrom ++

these guys could get a first

stone got more than a first in brannstrom, + a 2nd rounder, plus a plug
BlastyRocks a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 15 h 46
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 562
Mentions "j'aime": 162
I'm very pumped that I see a lot of NJ in position to get a good amount back. And then reality sets in and I realize the devils are doomed
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage