SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Getting a Playoff performer if Jake cant return

Créé par: Nights_King93
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 31 déc. 2019
Publié: 31 déc. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This gives the Pens a proven playoff performer. I would offer a similar package for a guy like Rakell in Anaheim. It seems as if both San Jose and Anaheim aren't getting in this year.

With Jake likely heading to LTIR, the Pens still have 7 million in cap space should they choose to. Go all in on a rental. They could also trade a guy like Bjugstad and save additional cash. If Jake will be back for the first or second round of the playoffs. This might be one of the last years to go "all in" with Sid and Geno. With young talent like Blueger, Marino, Lafferty, etc. Making contributions on the cheap, it feels like a good year to do it. Particularly with all of the injuries.
Transactions
SJS
  1. Galchenyuk, Alex
  2. Simon, Dominik
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Add on a good prospect if needed. I'd offer similar package for a guy like Rakell. San Jose gets a speedy, quality player that hasn't found his perfect spot in Pittsburgh. They also get cap relief if they decide to move on from him after this season, something they need for their young Winger this offseason.
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $72 449 125 $132 500 $3 832 500 $9 050 875 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
767 500 $767 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
874 125 $874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
31 déc. 2019 à 12 h 51
#1
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 41,346
Mentions "j'aime": 26,076
I'd be surprised if San Jose entertained any offers for Hertl that didn't include a first-round pick, but given Pittsburgh's current dire straits, maybe you wouldn't mind spending that 2020 first on him. It's not as if you're sure to get a better player than Hertl with that draft pick.
31 déc. 2019 à 12 h 57
#2
MNBassman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 8,360
Mentions "j'aime": 3,632
Jason Zucker should be available once he recovers from his own injury...
31 déc. 2019 à 13 h 2
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 5,011
Mentions "j'aime": 1,636
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I'd be surprised if San Jose entertained any offers for Hertl that didn't include a first-round pick, but given Pittsburgh's current dire straits, maybe you wouldn't mind spending that 2020 first on him. It's not as if you're sure to get a better player than Hertl with that draft pick.


Quoting: MNBassman
Jason Zucker should be available once he recovers from his own injury...


With all due respect to Hertl & Zucker, would rather the Pens trade for Marner. He’s better than both of them, honestly.

Here’s the team I made: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/1557374‬



‪What’d you think?‬
31 déc. 2019 à 13 h 10
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
This isnt even close. Hertl talks start with your best prospect and a first. This is a first line center whos 26 we are talking about, not a slight upgrade on galchenyuk. My counter would be Samuel Poulin, your 2020 first, a second and Desmith.
mokumboi a aimé ceci.
31 déc. 2019 à 13 h 25
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 224
Mentions "j'aime": 43
You can't pay everyone right now. I can't remember if you paid Labanc or Meier, but the other one is going to want 5-6 mill per this offseason. Galchenyuk might be great for you guys, if not you let him walk and suddenly have the money needed.

Hertl has two years left on his deal after this one. He will expect another raise. While he is a unique player, he is currently - 20 on the season. That is a red flag. Hertl is not a superstar. He is a very good player, but no superstar. Poulin, a first, and a second would be the starting point for a superstar. A guy like Couture for you guys. I know he is the new franchise player, so I didn't entertain a deal for him.

I would add in Legare and a good d prospect for Hertl if necessary. Not Poulin and a first. You can add Desmith, I just don't know what teams want him and people get roasted for adding a good backup goalie.

Marner would take Poulin, multiple firsts.. Etc. He is not a realistic target. To the other comment.
31 déc. 2019 à 13 h 41
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Nights_King93
You can't pay everyone right now. I can't remember if you paid Labanc or Meier, but the other one is going to want 5-6 mill per this offseason. Galchenyuk might be great for you guys, if not you let him walk and suddenly have the money needed.

Hertl has two years left on his deal after this one. He will expect another raise. While he is a unique player, he is currently - 20 on the season. That is a red flag. Hertl is not a superstar. He is a very good player, but no superstar. Poulin, a first, and a second would be the starting point for a superstar. A guy like Couture for you guys. I know he is the new franchise player, so I didn't entertain a deal for him.

I would add in Legare and a good d prospect for Hertl if necessary. Not Poulin and a first. You can add Desmith, I just don't know what teams want him and people get roasted for adding a good backup goalie.

Marner would take Poulin, multiple firsts.. Etc. He is not a realistic target. To the other comment.


Then why would sharks ever do this? If we are trading Hertl then we are full rebuilding and 26 year old flop Galchenyuk doesnt do that. I stand firm that if you want Hertl its going to cost your best prospect and a first+. Take a fun look at what Taylor Hall got, now notice that Hertl is younger, has more points, is a center and has multiple contract years.
OldNYIfan et hanson493 a aimé ceci.
31 déc. 2019 à 13 h 51
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
if Hertl was available he can get a much better package than a struggling pending UFA, a prospect and a 2nd round pick
Yikes talk about Homer low balling trade
OldNYIfan et papishark a aimé ceci.
31 déc. 2019 à 14 h 48
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 224
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Quoting: papishark
Then why would sharks ever do this? If we are trading Hertl then we are full rebuilding and 26 year old flop Galchenyuk doesnt do that. I stand firm that if you want Hertl its going to cost your best prospect and a first+. Take a fun look at what Taylor Hall got, now notice that Hertl is younger, has more points, is a center and has multiple contract years.


The fact that you are even comparing Hertl and Hall is laughable. Hertl is a very good player. But he is closer to Galchenyuk than Taylor Hall. Hall just won an MVP in 2018. Hertl played second and third line minutes most of his career.
31 déc. 2019 à 14 h 53
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 224
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Taylor Hall has averaged 0.86 points per game in his career and has an MVP season under his belt.

Hertl has averaged 0.62 points per game in his career.

Galchenyuk has averaged 0.61 points per game in his career.

I openly said it might take a pretty good prospect and Desmith as well. But it seems like I am closer to real value than you are if you are comparing Hertl with Hall.
31 déc. 2019 à 15 h 2
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 224
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Quoting: coga16
if Hertl was available he can get a much better package than a struggling pending UFA, a prospect and a 2nd round pick
Yikes talk about Homer low balling trade


San Jose is also in dire straits financially. They just let Pavelski walk for nothing. This gives them options, flexibility, a good draft pick, and potentially a good prospect. The Sharks are not going anywhere this year. They need to pay more guys this offseason. They can hope that Burns or Vlasic retire, but it is unlikely. If teams are trading a couple of prospects and two second rounders for P.K. Subban, I don't think they trade a couple of firsts and prospects for Hertl. The Pens now have the cap space to get Hertl and keep Galchenyuk, who seems to be turning a corner and will only get more opportunities now. I just think he has value and the Sharks might want to see if he fits their club, like the Kane deal.
31 déc. 2019 à 15 h 3
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,618
Mentions "j'aime": 2,764
Quoting: Nights_King93
Taylor Hall has averaged 0.86 points per game in his career and has an MVP season under his belt.

Hertl has averaged 0.62 points per game in his career.

Galchenyuk has averaged 0.61 points per game in his career.

I openly said it might take a pretty good prospect and Desmith as well. But it seems like I am closer to real value than you are if you are comparing Hertl with Hall.


so you are going to go career averages for points to value these guys? not recency bias where hertl just put up 77 points last year was killing it in the playoffs and is slightly under a point per game on a bad sharks team this year? not to mention his absolute STEAL of a contract. Sharks will not move hertl unless its a significant overpay. Labanc just got a 1 year 1m deal. he isnt playing as well as he did last year. hes going to have a roughly 40 point year which will not give him 5-6 mill per year in the offseason. especially as an rfa. it just wont happen. Is this team going to be kind of bad next year too, yes. Can they move one of their high priced dmen and get back some cap flexibility and some prospects absolutely.
papishark a aimé ceci.
31 déc. 2019 à 15 h 5
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,618
Mentions "j'aime": 2,764
Quoting: Nights_King93
San Jose is also in dire straits financially. They just let Pavelski walk for nothing. This gives them options, flexibility, a good draft pick, and potentially a good prospect. The Sharks are not going anywhere this year. They need to pay more guys this offseason. They can hope that Burns or Vlasic retire, but it is unlikely. If teams are trading a couple of prospects and two second rounders for P.K. Subban, I don't think they trade a couple of firsts and prospects for Hertl. The Pens now have the cap space to get Hertl and keep Galchenyuk, who seems to be turning a corner and will only get more opportunities now. I just think he has value and the Sharks might want to see if he fits their club, like the Kane deal.


P.K. subban is one of the most overrated players in the nhl. galchenyuk sucks. "turning a corner" this guy was supposed to be a top 6 center. he has 13 points in 30 games. now hes a middle 6 winger who might get you 50 points, he more than likely will not. you are overvaluing galchenyuk and undervaluing hertl.
31 déc. 2019 à 15 h 7
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 224
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Quoting: hanson493
so you are going to go career averages for points to value these guys? not recency bias where hertl just put up 77 points last year was killing it in the playoffs and is slightly under a point per game on a bad sharks team this year? not to mention his absolute STEAL of a contract. Sharks will not move hertl unless its a significant overpay. Labanc just got a 1 year 1m deal. he isnt playing as well as he did last year. hes going to have a roughly 40 point year which will not give him 5-6 mill per year in the offseason. especially as an rfa. it just wont happen. Is this team going to be kind of bad next year too, yes. Can they move one of their high priced dmen and get back some cap flexibility and some prospects absolutely.


Career averages are a better indicator. I'm guessing you don't know that the Pens have played Galchenyuk on the fourth line this year. There are games he barely sees the ice. Hertl is a big minute eater for the Sharks. So yes, Hertl is having a "good" year, but the Sharks are also minus 20 with him on the ice. Maybe the sign of a guy looking to get his points where he can and gamble because the team isn't playing well anyways. Galchenyuk still has 13 points with improper usage. I'm a Pens fan. I love Sullivan, but he just loves some guys and doesn't mesh with other guys. Galchenyuk seems to be one of them with his usage.
31 déc. 2019 à 15 h 11
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Nights_King93
The fact that you are even comparing Hertl and Hall is laughable. Hertl is a very good player. But he is closer to Galchenyuk than Taylor Hall. Hall just won an MVP in 2018. Hertl played second and third line minutes most of his career.


Yeah no, you clearly dont know the player. I would give you a comparison but Pit has no players like Hertl. Galchenyuk is worth little to nothing as a pending UFA with horrible points and play. When you want a 77 point player, it costs more than your scraps
31 déc. 2019 à 15 h 11
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 224
Mentions "j'aime": 43
For proof, I went and checked it. Chuk is averaging 12:32 a game, playing on lines with less talent. He has thirteen points. If you give him 18:37 a game, what Hertl plays, you can safely say he has 19 points this year. Now give him the lines that Hertl plays on. I'm not saying they are the same by any means, but Galchenyuk has value still. I added Simon, a second round pick, and a good prospect to even it out.
31 déc. 2019 à 15 h 14
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Nights_King93
For proof, I went and checked it. Chuk is averaging 12:32 a game, playing on lines with less talent. He has thirteen points. If you give him 18:37 a game, what Hertl plays, you can safely say he has 19 points this year. Now give him the lines that Hertl plays on. I'm not saying they are the same by any means, but Galchenyuk has value still. I added Simon, a second round pick, and a good prospect to even it out.


No you cant. If Galch could do what your saying, then Pit would be playing him there instead of trading for Hertl!
31 déc. 2019 à 15 h 21
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 224
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Quoting: papishark
No you cant. If Galch could do what your saying, then Pit would be playing him there instead of trading for Hertl!


That just isn't true, Sullivan has players he just doesn't mesh with. He has others that he loves. He plays a guy like Simon on the top line all of the time over Rust, Hornqvist, etc. Because there is something about Simon he really likes.

He obviously has an issue with the style of play or the way Galchenyuk goes about his business. He had similar issues with Kessel. I'd love to play Galchenyuk on the top line now, I just know Sullivan won't do it. There are weird dynamics on every team, pure points don't tell the same story on different teams with different lines and different games. The Penguins compete almost every night. The Sharks are having trouble doing that. Easier for a big minute guy like Hertl to score when he is down three goals than Galchenyuk getting limited opportunities holding onto a one goal lead.

Right now, Hertl is a very prolific offensive player. I'm not saying you do a 1-1 with Galchenyuk or anything remotely close to that. I'm saying no one outside of San Jose would compare Hertl to Taylor Hall.
31 déc. 2019 à 15 h 27
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Nights_King93
That just isn't true, Sullivan has players he just doesn't mesh with. He has others that he loves. He plays a guy like Simon on the top line all of the time over Rust, Hornqvist, etc. Because there is something about Simon he really likes.

He obviously has an issue with the style of play or the way Galchenyuk goes about his business. He had similar issues with Kessel. I'd love to play Galchenyuk on the top line now, I just know Sullivan won't do it. There are weird dynamics on every team, pure points don't tell the same story on different teams with different lines and different games. The Penguins compete almost every night. The Sharks are having trouble doing that. Easier for a big minute guy like Hertl to score when he is down three goals than Galchenyuk getting limited opportunities holding onto a one goal lead.

Right now, Hertl is a very prolific offensive player. I'm not saying you do a 1-1 with Galchenyuk or anything remotely close to that. I'm saying no one outside of San Jose would compare Hertl to Taylor Hall.


Well in terms of trade value, you should. Because no ones giving you great players for busts and seconds
31 déc. 2019 à 15 h 42
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Nights_King93
San Jose is also in dire straits financially. They just let Pavelski walk for nothing. This gives them options, flexibility, a good draft pick, and potentially a good prospect. The Sharks are not going anywhere this year. They need to pay more guys this offseason. They can hope that Burns or Vlasic retire, but it is unlikely. If teams are trading a couple of prospects and two second rounders for P.K. Subban, I don't think they trade a couple of firsts and prospects for Hertl. The Pens now have the cap space to get Hertl and keep Galchenyuk, who seems to be turning a corner and will only get more opportunities now. I just think he has value and the Sharks might want to see if he fits their club, like the Kane deal.


again, Pittsburgh isnt the only team who could help them out. That package will get quickly out bid if they needed to move Hertl. Galchenyuk has no value right now, Friedman has said they have been trying to move him and no one wants him.

If you want Hertl you have to pry him away from the Sharks and out bid other teams.
papishark a aimé ceci.
31 déc. 2019 à 15 h 43
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: papishark
No you cant. If Galch could do what your saying, then Pit would be playing him there instead of trading for Hertl!


they have been trying to trade Galchenyuk and no one wants him. The guy is living in a fantasy world when it comes to Galchenyuk
31 déc. 2019 à 17 h 0
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: coga16
they have been trying to trade Galchenyuk and no one wants him. The guy is living in a fantasy world when it comes to Galchenyuk


Oh I know. I dont think hes a lost cause but his value is net zero right now
31 déc. 2019 à 17 h 53
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: papishark
Oh I know. I dont think hes a lost cause but his value is net zero right now


I was talking with an Avs buddy and wondering about Hertl last night. With no 1st rounder and thinks looking grime with Sens owning it. What do the Sharks do, dont care and just try to get another 1st back and reload for next season? A goalie would go a long way to helping the sharks lessen the Sens pick. We thought a 1st, Jost, and Francouz could start a package but not sure if Jost is enough to tempt the sharks. 1st and Newhook probably gets a convo started
31 déc. 2019 à 18 h 23
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: coga16
I was talking with an Avs buddy and wondering about Hertl last night. With no 1st rounder and thinks looking grime with Sens owning it. What do the Sharks do, dont care and just try to get another 1st back and reload for next season? A goalie would go a long way to helping the sharks lessen the Sens pick. We thought a 1st, Jost, and Francouz could start a package but not sure if Jost is enough to tempt the sharks. 1st and Newhook probably gets a convo started

Heres the main issue, if the sharks are trading Hertl it means we go into full tank, so if thats the case Francouz isnt going to be useful to us. Id definitely consider a first and Newhook, but I think you would still need to add because that pick could very well be 31st or 30th which is pretty late.
31 déc. 2019 à 18 h 26
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: papishark
Heres the main issue, if the sharks are trading Hertl it means we go into full tank, so if thats the case Francouz isnt going to be useful to us. Id definitely consider a first and Newhook, but I think you would still need to add because that pick could very well be 31st or 30th which is pretty late.


yeah the sharks in a tough spot. Not sure what they do, cant worry about the pick, its gone. If they do just blow it up, I agree get as many top young assets as you can. Whats the vibe with the fan base? Blow it up?
papishark a aimé ceci.
31 déc. 2019 à 18 h 29
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: coga16
yeah the sharks in a tough spot. Not sure what they do, cant worry about the pick, its gone. If they do just blow it up, I agree get as many top young assets as you can. Whats the vibe with the fan base? Blow it up?


No, I wouldnt say so. Sharks fans are used to being contenders so the longshot hopes are there. If we blow it up then this season is pointless, so most of us are holding out that we pull a blues
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage