SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tuch

Créé par: Nikolay_Zherdev
Équipe: 2019-20 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 19 août 2019
Publié: 19 août 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 350 000 $
33 450 000 $
Transactions
1.
VGK
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel
  2. Georgiev, Alexandar
  3. Hájek, Libor
  4. Namestnikov, Vladislav
  5. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
  6. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
2.
NYR
  1. Tolvanen, Eeli
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
NSH
  1. Kreider, Chris (1 000 000 $ retained)
3.
NYR
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (FLA)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (COL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de MIN
Logo de NYR
Logo de FLA
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de COL
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 308 132 $0 $8 400 000 $191 868 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Predators de Nashville
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 août 2019 à 18 h 0
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,595
Mentions "j'aime": 5,464
Fun team or for real?

Because VGK won't move Tuch and COL doesn't need another D.
Nikolay_Zherdev et aedoran a aimé ceci.
19 août 2019 à 18 h 9
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: bhavikp27
Fun team or for real?

Because VGK won't move Tuch and COL doesn't need another D.


especially one that they were doing cartwheels that they were able to get rid of (which was a trade to the rangers in the first place)
19 août 2019 à 18 h 10
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,161
Mentions "j'aime": 437
I've got a feeling that Georgie is gonna cause a conundrum for us in net. He's got the work ethic and the ability (and Benoit Allaire) to be a star, regardless of who else is in the pipeline. Hot take, I know.

I know Tuch is good, but what's the point in taking him over Buch right now? Bigger cap hit for longer time. Buch will finally get to play in a deeper lineup and it's possible we may see his numbers look similar to those of Tuch. If he does perform better and earns more in 2 years, how much more will that be? Maybe 2m tops? That's not too much of an issue with the amount of space we'll have then. To lose Hajek over it makes no sense for what we're trying to do to take one marginally better player and 3 cap dumps for prospects with upside and stuff on top of that.
Nikolay_Zherdev et ChytilMania a aimé ceci.
19 août 2019 à 18 h 29
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,441
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Vegas isnt trading Tuch for that package
aedoran et Eli a aimé ceci.
19 août 2019 à 18 h 38
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 106
Mentions "j'aime": 34
Quoting: shmoeman
Vegas isnt trading Tuch


Fixed it
Eli a aimé ceci.
19 août 2019 à 19 h 55
#6
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Modifié 19 août 2019 à 20 h 2
This offer looks worse than it should, because you're overthinking it and adding stuff that's unnecessary and could be even counterproductive.

Georgiev for M. Subban is kind of pointless. They are close enough in age and stats that each team would rather keep the guy that knows his teammates and how they play. Yes, Georgiev is two years younger with about as many wins, but who cares. A two year age difference is not enough to overcome Vegas' doubts about why you want to get rid of Georgiev and see this part as a positive. Drop that part.

Namestnikov for Reaves actually removes half the backchecking and 90% of the toughness from Vegas' third line, to get a guy who got two more goals and eight more assists last year, at a million dollars higher cap hit. I don't think they do that swap as a one for one, let alone call it an incentive to move Tuch.

An NHL-ready, recent 2nd round pick defenseman in Hajek plus a 24 year old forward who got 20g 20a last year for a 23 year old forward who got 20g30a last year? Not bad, but not quite there.

Holden isn't holding much value right now, so yeah, you're offering Hajek, Buchnevich, 4th and 6th for Tuch. Drop the late picks, and put a 2nd on the table, and they might start to sit down and think about it? But you have to remember: Vegas agreed not to take Eric Staal, or some really good defensemen, in the expansion draft, to get Tuch and a pick, instead. They do like the kid, a bit, as they should. He skates really quickly. He scores goals. He checks a bit. He improves a lot, every year he plays, so far.

Basically, younger players tend to improve at a faster rate than older ones. Since Tuch is a year younger with ten more points last year than Buchnevich, he probably projects to stay better than him, for the forseeable future. Adding a decent defenseman prospect is nice, but if that's the only reason to make the trade, it's not enough.
Buckoleboy a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage