SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What constitutes an overpay for Marner

Créé par: Goulet
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 3 août 2019
Publié: 3 août 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
94 points seems like a lot but is that all that matters? It would have won the Art Ross five years ago but this past year 94 points was good for 11th and his points per game rate was 15th for players playing at least 50 games.

The rules have changed, the game is faster and scoring is up. 31 players scored at a point per game or better last year compared to 24 the year before, 8 the year prior, 6, 8, and so on. Scoring is up.

Draisaitl, Tarasenko, Gaudreau, and Pastrnak are all high scoring wingers, all scored more points per game compared to the rest of the league in their contract years (10th, 9th, 7th, 12th), and all signed deals ranging from 6-8 years with cap hit %'s from 8.89 to 11.33% and cap hits in the 6.66 to 8.5 million range.

Then there is the Tavares factor. A 25 point jump is partially self growth, partially team growth, and partially playing with Tavares who over the last decade, is 3rd in goals and 7th in points.

I like Marner. Tavares likes Marner. Matthews and the rest of the team likes Marner. His agent REALLY likes Marner but let's be realistic here. You're not comparable to a #1 centre and I was generous with the 4 comps I used. 8 figures is an overpay at any contract length.

I gave him 11% on his 8 year deal. Yes, I know he won't take it.

Good thing Dubas cleared out all the dead money to do it.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
88 965 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $79 161 366 $0 $0 $2 338 634 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
8 965 000 $8 965 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 août 2019 à 13 h 54
#1
LEAFSandBRUINSfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 1,492
Mentions "j'aime": 461
To me I’m fine with a 9.5 as long as it’s 7-8 years because it’ll be a steal in a couple years
Trickster, oneX et Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
3 août 2019 à 14 h 11
#2
V5 ANA and BOG
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,901
Mentions "j'aime": 698
Anything more than 9 is an overpay. 9-10 is borderline acceptable, if he gets more than 10 there needs to be a serious conversation about Dubas's job.
3 août 2019 à 14 h 13
#3
LEAFSandBRUINSfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 1,492
Mentions "j'aime": 461
Quoting: NR1203
Anything more than 9 is an overpay. 9-10 is borderline acceptable, if he gets more than 10 there needs to be a serious conversation about Dubas's job.


Unless it’s a 8 year deal.
Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
3 août 2019 à 14 h 14
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Very well thought out, gj, as leafs GM I'd be willing to go a bit more than 9, but no more than what Mark Stone got (ideally for me, a person who hates the leafs he signs like a 12x2 deal, then in two years gets like 14x3 bc the cap will probably go up quite a bit, then he walks as a UFA lol)
3 août 2019 à 14 h 17
#5
V5 ANA and BOG
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,901
Mentions "j'aime": 698
Quoting: Snipshow4416
Unless it’s a 8 year deal.


Even on an 8year deal, I wouldn't pay more than 10. He's a 60-70 point player without Tavares, but luckily for him we won't see that side of him since Tavares is going to be here for a long time. Tavares's free agency came at the perfect time for Marner.
3 août 2019 à 14 h 37
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,876
Mentions "j'aime": 2,689
All very valid points in the description and the same things I've brought up every time there's a Marner related ACGM. There's another ACGM where a couple people claim that Leafs fans hate Marner...well the smart ones anyway.
It's not about hate, it's a negoiation. Just because a GM does not want to overpay for a player does not equal hate.

Do other fanbases and their GM's hate RFA's on their respective teams? NO.
So why is this an issue with Marner? Because it's not.
Trickster, Sign_em_up000000, Goulet and 2 others a aimé ceci.
3 août 2019 à 15 h 5
#7
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Quoting: NR1203
All very valid points in the description and the same things I've brought up every time there's a Marner related ACGM. There's another ACGM where a couple people claim that Leafs fans hate Marner...well the smart ones anyway.
It's not about hate, it's a negoiation. Just because a GM does not want to overpay for a player does not equal hate.

Do other fanbases and their GM's hate RFA's on their respective teams? NO.
So why is this an issue with Marner? Because it's not.


Quoting: AFOX10900
Very well thought out, gj, as leafs GM I'd be willing to go a bit more than 9, but no more than what Mark Stone got (ideally for me, a person who hates the leafs he signs like a 12x2 deal, then in two years gets like 14x3 bc the cap will probably go up quite a bit, then he walks as a UFA lol)


Quoting: AFOX10900
Even on an 8year deal, I wouldn't pay more than 10. He's a 60-70 point player without Tavares, but luckily for him we won't see that side of him since Tavares is going to be here for a long time. Tavares's free agency came at the perfect time for Marner.


Quoting: Snipshow4416
Unless it’s a 8 year deal.


Quoting: Snipshow4416
To me I’m fine with a 9.5 as long as it’s 7-8 years because it’ll be a steal in a couple years


Which player would you rather have, Jake Guentzel (5 years 6 million AAV) or Mitch Marner (5 years 10.5 million AAV)?
3 août 2019 à 15 h 9
#8
LEAFSandBRUINSfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 1,492
Mentions "j'aime": 461
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
Which player would you rather have, Jake Guentzel (5 years 6 million AAV) or Mitch Marner (5 years 10.5 million AAV)?


Marner
3 août 2019 à 15 h 10
#9
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Quoting: Snipshow4416
Marner


I’m relieved to hear that. Honestly, Guentzel on Tavares’ wing may not even be a 70 point player whereas Marner on Crosby’s wing would be 120 points.
Snipshow4416 a aimé ceci.
3 août 2019 à 15 h 12
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 61,128
Mentions "j'aime": 23,546
Goulet: Too much logic in your description.

Note: I don't why folks think there is going to be a significant bump in revenue/cap. Even with the Vegas bump the cap has gone up just 6.5m in two years.
So even if Marner signs a 6 year contract, the cap at end of his contract might be 98m. Hardly justifying overpaying any player.

If the offers by the Leafs are so underwhelming to Marner, you would have thought Marner would have signed with some other teams . I guess Marner has received a total of 31 teams giving offering him underwhelming offers.

10m would make Marner the 10th highest paid player in the league. Not justisfied for his RFA status....maybe not even if he was a UFA.

As oneX said, "Must be a whole lotta GMs hating their RFAs, because so many are still not signed." (great sarcasm) I'm surprised/disappointed that so many contracts have been dragged out so long. But both sides have the right to say "no" to any proposal offered.
oneX et blowing_the_zone a aimé ceci.
3 août 2019 à 15 h 16
#11
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Quoting: palhal
Goulet: Too much logic in your description.

Note: I don't why folks think there is going to be a significant bump in revenue/cap. Even with the Vegas bump the cap has gone up just 6.5m in two years.
So even if Marner signs a 6 year contract, the cap at end of his contract might be 98m. Hardly justifying overpaying any player.

If the offers by the Leafs are so underwhelming to Marner, you would have thought Marner would have signed with some other teams . I guess Marner has received a total of 31 teams giving offering him underwhelming offers.

10m would make Marner the 10th highest paid player in the league. Not justisfied for his RFA status....maybe not even if he was a UFA.

As oneX said, "Must be a whole lotta GMs hating their RFAs, because so many are still not signed." (great sarcasm) I'm surprised/disappointed that so many contracts have been dragged out so long. But both sides have the right to say "no" to any proposal offered.


Which player would you rather have, Jake Guentzel (5 years 6 million AAV) or Mitch Marner (5 years 10.5 million AAV)?
3 août 2019 à 15 h 24
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,876
Mentions "j'aime": 2,689
Quoting: palhal
Goulet: Too much logic in your description.

Note: I don't why folks think there is going to be a significant bump in revenue/cap. Even with the Vegas bump the cap has gone up just 6.5m in two years.
So even if Marner signs a 6 year contract, the cap at end of his contract might be 98m. Hardly justifying overpaying any player.

If the offers by the Leafs are so underwhelming to Marner, you would have thought Marner would have signed with some other teams . I guess Marner has received a total of 31 teams giving offering him underwhelming offers.

10m would make Marner the 10th highest paid player in the league. Not justisfied for his RFA status....maybe not even if he was a UFA.

As oneX said, "Must be a whole lotta GMs hating their RFAs, because so many are still not signed." (great sarcasm) I'm surprised/disappointed that so many contracts have been dragged out so long. But both sides have the right to say "no" to any proposal offered.


Man...if only more people thought logically like you and @Goulet did here.
You are also right about the revenue/cap.
The NHL needs to focus on getting their product in front of more people rather than just taking the most money from whatever network.

And if they do take less money for more exposure, that will mean smaller cap increases.
blowing_the_zone a aimé ceci.
3 août 2019 à 15 h 26
#13
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 61,128
Mentions "j'aime": 23,546
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
Which player would you rather have, Jake Guentzel (5 years 6 million AAV) or Mitch Marner (5 years 10.5 million AAV)?


I'd say Marner. But if that's the case, why didn't Pittsburg not sign Guentzel and instead sign Marner for 5 X 10.5m in July. So what's your point?
Marner has the right to sign with any team, world wide, including the NHL. Leafs aren't holding him back at all. Just like Point, Rantanen, Laine, Connor, McAvoy, Carlo, Boesner (who have I missed), they can sign with any team. Obviously the players haven't received offers that they like....at least right now. Those same offers may look very good in September, October or November.
3 août 2019 à 15 h 33
#14
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Quoting: palhal
I'd say Marner. But if that's the case, why didn't Pittsburg not sign Guentzel and instead sign Marner for 5 X 10.5m in July. So what's your point?
Marner has the right to sign with any team, world wide, including the NHL. Leafs aren't holding him back at all. Just like Point, Rantanen, Laine, Connor, McAvoy, Carlo, Boesner (who have I missed), they can sign with any team. Obviously the players haven't received offers that they like....at least right now. Those same offers may look very good in September, October or November.


To be honest, I was surprised Guentzel didn't take 10 million dollars AAV on a 5 year deal. Most Penguins fans felt he deserved it considering how well he played in the playoffs. We were all relieved that he took such a team friendly deal, it now looks like a steal. But honestly I don't think he is as good as Marner.
3 août 2019 à 15 h 36
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 418
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
I’m relieved to hear that. Honestly, Guentzel on Tavares’ wing may not even be a 70 point player whereas Marner on Crosby’s wing would be 120 points.


Tavares, more than Crosby, has a history of taking 40-50 point players and making them 60-70 point players on his wing. Parenteau, Moulson, Okposo, Bailey, Lee...who am I missing?

The answer to your Marner/Guentzel question is Guentzel. That 4.5M is not worth 20-35 points and is better spent elsewhere.
3 août 2019 à 15 h 36
#16
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 61,128
Mentions "j'aime": 23,546
Quoting: oneX
Man...if only more people thought logically like you and @Goulet did here.
You are also right about the revenue/cap.
The NHL needs to focus on getting their product in front of more people rather than just taking the most money from whatever network.

And if they do take less money for more exposure, that will mean smaller cap increases.


When former NBA VP Gary Bettman was anointed the Commish of the NHL, 25 years ...the hope and promise was that NHL was going to be a national watched sport in the USA resulting in huge TV deals for the league. Well this has never happened and likely never will. There are just too many small NHL markets who depend almost solely on there walkup game day attendees. Bettman and his minions have spent much of their energies bailing out poor franchises which were often awarded to owners with no financial backing.
From a financial POV....just for an operating league, the NHL should about 20 franchises and a cap hit 100m. The other franchises drag down the cap, but it does provide employment to another 250 NHLer and 300 AHLers. So the players don't really object to the lower cap, because more of than have high paying jobs. The owners don't want contraction because then the defunct franchises and even some of the others would have almost zero dollars in value.
So the NHL and there structure isn't likely to change. Interesting the NHL rich owners seems to more socialistic (share the financial resources) than the top players.
oneX, Goulet et blowing_the_zone a aimé ceci.
3 août 2019 à 16 h 5
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,132
Mentions "j'aime": 1,540
Excellent description, Goulet.
Goulet a aimé ceci.
3 août 2019 à 16 h 19
#18
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Modifié 3 août 2019 à 16 h 38
Quoting: Goulet
Tavares, more than Crosby, has a history of taking 40-50 point players and making them 60-70 point players on his wing. Parenteau, Moulson, Okposo, Bailey, Lee...who am I missing?

The answer to your Marner/Guentzel question is Guentzel. That 4.5M is not worth 20-35 points and is better spent elsewhere.


You cannot be serious. Did you really just say Tavares is better at elevating his linemates' play than Crosby? May I remind you that Crosby converted Kunitz into a 35 goal 70 point scorer and Dupuis a 25 goal 60 point guy? Both these guys were undrafted and less talented than literally all the players you just named. He helped Sheary, another undrafted midget to scoring almost a point per game on his wing. Helped Guentzel achieve 25 goals and 50 points in the playoffs. Made Ryan Malone a 30 goal scorer! Is that not enough? Crosby at his peak was MILES ahead of Tavares, it's not even close. Tell me again, how many 100 point seasons does JT have again? So yes, Crosby scoring 110 points with Dupuis and Kunitz, he'd get 150 playing with Marner and help Marner to 120. Honestly you probably just posted the stupidest take of all time.
3 août 2019 à 16 h 53
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 15
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Modifié 3 août 2019 à 17 h 2
All offseason I’ve been leaning to that thought process
75M on 8 year term is both fair and justifiable

As we got closer I know I will be fine w something in the 10s for sake of moving on but deserves and wants seem too be far apart

If he insists on shorter term I’m offering
50M on 6 years
22.5 on 3 years

Basically I see fair value starting at 5 in year 1 to 12.5 by the end of contract
5. 5. 7.5 7.5 10 10 12.5 12,5
3 août 2019 à 17 h 26
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 418
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
You cannot be serious. Did you really just say Tavares is better at elevating his linemates' play than Crosby? May I remind you that Crosby converted Kunitz into a 35 goal 70 point scorer and Dupuis a 25 goal 60 point guy? Both these guys were undrafted and less talented than literally all the players you just named. He helped Sheary, another undrafted midget to scoring almost a point per game on his wing. Helped Guentzel achieve 25 goals and 50 points in the playoffs. Made Ryan Malone a 30 goal scorer! Is that not enough? Crosby at his peak was MILES ahead of Tavares, it's not even close. Tell me again, how many 100 point seasons does JT have again? So yes, Crosby scoring 110 points with Dupuis and Kunitz, he'd get 150 playing with Marner and help Marner to 120. Honestly you probably just posted the stupidest take of all time.


Tell me how you really feel.
3 août 2019 à 17 h 29
#21
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Quoting: Goulet
Tell me how you really feel.


Crosby is better than Tavares. You cannot compare someone who can't even put up 90 points playing with an elite winger in Marner to someone who put up 120 points in his sophomore year playing with Ryan Malone!
3 août 2019 à 17 h 36
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 418
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
Crosby is better than Tavares. You cannot compare someone who can't even put up 90 points playing with an elite winger in Marner to someone who put up 120 points in his sophomore year playing with Ryan Malone!


At no point did I put JT in front of Crosby. Crosby is the best player of the last decade, bar none. Tavares, is somehow the forgotten one...and too many people, like yourself, believe Marner came before Tavares. He didn't. Marner is hands down the best winger JT has played with and you see that in his career high in goals. BUT...Tavares put up three 80 point seasons on the island with absolutely no help.

Crosby has improved everyone around him. Tavares has done a hell of a job with his second rate wingers over the years and doesn't get any credit for it. Crosby gets all the credit in the world. And deserves it.

On this Leafs team no one talks about how good Tavares is. 47 goals, best forward on the team last year and yet he is invisible to the fanbase in favour of the kids who aren't yet as good.

Marner is good. Great passer, great effort level, arguably the best winger on the team after the season Nylander had. But best player? No.
blowing_the_zone a aimé ceci.
3 août 2019 à 17 h 41
#23
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,396
Mentions "j'aime": 996
Quoting: Goulet
At no point did I put JT in front of Crosby. Crosby is the best player of the last decade, bar none. Tavares, is somehow the forgotten one...and too many people, like yourself, believe Marner came before Tavares. He didn't. Marner is hands down the best winger JT has played with and you see that in his career high in goals. BUT...Tavares put up three 80 point seasons on the island with absolutely no help.

Crosby has improved everyone around him. Tavares has done a hell of a job with his second rate wingers over the years and doesn't get any credit for it. Crosby gets all the credit in the world. And deserves it.

On this Leafs team no one talks about how good Tavares is. 47 goals, best forward on the team last year and yet he is invisible to the fanbase in favour of the kids who aren't yet as good.

Marner is good. Great passer, great effort level, arguably the best winger on the team after the season Nylander had. But best player? No.


I never said Marner was the best player on the team. My point is if Sidney Crosby could turn Chris Kunitz into a 35 goal 70 point scorer at the age of 34, no doubt in my mind that he would help Anders Lee achieve 50 goals 100 points. I get that you Leaf fans hate Marner and want to make sure he looks like a passenger under Tavares, but there are better centremen out there than JT who will make him look even better.
3 août 2019 à 17 h 46
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,493
Mentions "j'aime": 1,562
To answer the question in Title....overpayment for Matthews does.....
3 août 2019 à 17 h 53
#25
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,930
Mentions "j'aime": 418
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
I never said Marner was the best player on the team. My point is if Sidney Crosby could turn Chris Kunitz into a 35 goal 70 point scorer at the age of 34, no doubt in my mind that he would help Anders Lee achieve 50 goals 100 points. I get that you Leaf fans hate Marner and want to make sure he looks like a passenger under Tavares, but there are better centremen out there than JT who will make him look even better.


This isn't a debate over Crosby and Tavares, there is no question mark there. But you have to at least recognize that Crosby had a supporting cast that ultimately led to Cups and JT had no one.

There is no hate here for Marner. Only reality. Many Leaf fans think the world of him and want to open the vaults and when anyone applies a little logic to the situation it is presumed to be hate. It's not. This is how an arbitration hearing would go. One side presents their case and then so does the other.

I hear a lot of people talk about cap inflation, here I wanted to point out the inflation in offense leaguewide. They'd laugh at us now, back in the 80's they were scoring at more than 1 goal more per game and 94 points was what the better D in the league were putting up.
blowing_the_zone a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage