6 jui 2018
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Messages dans les forums
Messages par jour
Sujets de discussion
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingLundqvist30</b></div><div>Is Pietrangelo possible? Yes.
Would it be dumb for the Leafs to sign him? Yes.
Would they have to sacrifice depth to sign him? Yes.
It just never made sense to me on why the leafs would sign him. Yes he’s good, but he’s going to want $9,000,000+. You sign him and that’s $42,000,000 in 4 players (AM, MM, JT, and AP respectively).</div></div>
Losing depth can be fixed thru FA where you run 3rd Line with 2,4M players ( like Janmark + Larsson + Fast = 6,5M instead Johnsson - Kerfoot - Kapanen = 10M ) and 4th Line with Simmonds - Koivu - Spezza type of structure.
Actually thing is.....TML Stanley window is from 2019/2020 to 2022/2023 when Tavares will start to decline proly. So as much as i was in doubts about Pietrangelo to be signed, im assuming Dubarellis plan is that exactly, so his way of ALL IN and it could actually pay off. Lets worry about small things later, when 1967 will finally be erased from TML collective mind.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingLundqvist30</b></div><div>Honestly (unpopular opinion here I know), but if Sandin develops as advertised, you guys shouldn’t resign Rielly.</div></div>
Pretty much on spot
Muzzin - Liljegren
Sandin - Pietrangelo
Someone - Someone
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>It's not knit-picking, another year on a deal makes a big difference offering twice the value versus a 1 year. Your come back is a difference of $50K against the cap? Okay well the cap went up the year after so actually Montour at the time was a bit more expensive when considered % of total cap. Come on dude, be better then this, you'd be blind to not understand an extra year is huge in trade value versus 1 year.
And NO, we want nothing to do with Johnsson. He'd have a hard time making our top 9 and at $3.4M, coming off a bad injury, and only on pace for 15 goals prior to the injury he is nothing but negative value to the Hawks.</div></div>
Its 500k which is bit more right ? Almost and additional player on roster or actually it can be considered 1y Term on lower contracts below 5M......Again, rental vs 2 years noone is dening the difference, its just it should be 2021 1st ( so the "conditional one" ) and not the defined one of 2020 as 15 OA.
I understand you dont want to have nothing with Johnsson, i was trying to show what kind of return it should be, so 3rd liner who can net 30 points even if not leetching on Matthews ( which is better asset then Guhle in Montours trade )