PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
mytduxfan
Membre depuis
25 janv. 2017
Équipe favorite
Ducks d'Anaheim
Messages dans les forums
1457
Messages par jour
0.5
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 mars à 12 h 13
Sujet:
2025 Repeat Cup Champs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Why would this be a joke? His GF/60 this year is 2.39, GA/60 is 2.47. Let's compare this to another player, with a GF.60 of 2.32 and a GA/60 of 2.44. Kotkaniemi's got an xGF/60 of 3.16 (this is incredible, anything over 3 is VERY strong) and a xGA of 2.55. The player I was comparing to in the opening has a xGF/60 of 2.62 and a xGA/60 of 2.56.
These two players are Jesperi Kotkaniemi and Nick Suzuki.... there is no world where saying Kotkaniemi is a great play driivng young centerman isn't cold, hard truth. If you just look at point totals instead of actually watching the player, like you apparently clearly do, you'd see this too.</div></div>
GF and GA/60 doesn't scale linearly though, but okay. It also doesn't account for quality of competition.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
17 mars à 10 h 29
Sujet:
Thats likely the real cost for Zegras
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GuyGuyGuy</b></div><div>We aren’t trading a top 10 pick for Zegras lol. If we do trade our top 10 pick, it’s for Mercer, Necas, Kyrou or any good defensively PPG forward. Any forward in the top 10 will very likely be way better than Zegras. We are building for the future, not to be mid 2-3 years then it’s over and we have to rebuild again</div></div>
Good options to go for. Not sure any of those teams are looking to move those players for picks though or at all for that matter. Good luck in your search though.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shanesaw9</b></div><div>If you use Debrincat as a comparable it would be more like the 2024 1st (top 10 pick) plus a 2nd and a 3rd. No need to include Barron.</div></div>
Different situation though as OTT had to move DeBrincat as they couldn't afford his next contract. We don't have to move Z. PV even said that GMs came calling after rumours. He didn't actively look to shop the kid. I doubt we'd move Zegras for a top 10 pick and few additional picks. You're basically converting a proven talent into a prospect you hope turns into Zegras + some other prospects with a low chance of success at the NHL. It also delays our rebuild. Pass. Need a proven piece coming along with the picks or, better yet, a proven piece of equivalent age alone.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div><strong>I think the third and the seventh are too much</strong> but I'll also agree with ShaneSaw9 -- take out Barron and the seventh and it would be a fair offer.
But you guys don't have to keep worrying about it -- Zegras isn't on the market.
Hasn't it occurred to you Habs fans that the only people posting ACGMs with Zegras-to-Montreal trades are Canadiens stalwarts? It's <strong>you</strong> guys who want him -- not us Anaheim adherents who want someone different, or want him to be gone.</div></div>
I think it is a good offer, but I'd pass personally. For me it's Reinbacher+ or Slaf straight up. The rest doesn't really make. We don't need more picks and prospects unless they are highly-touted, fill a need, and close to/in the NHL already.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 mars à 10 h 15
Sujet:
2025 Repeat Cup Champs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Canes don't consider a single one of these. Andersen is better than Fleury, why make that deal? Why sign Pesce only to yeet him to Chicago? If they sign him they'll keep him. They didn't just extend Lemieux to dump him in San Jose.
The Anaheim trade is laughable. Vatrano has one year shooting at 13%, scoring at a rate he's never shown he can score at before, <strong>and he's suddenly worth one of the most dymanic play driving young centermen in the NHL?</strong></div></div>
Are you being sarcastic?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 mars à 10 h 10
Sujet:
Anaheim Fans
Lol'd so hard at the "ever heard of Brian Leach?!?!?!?"
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>batman</b></div><div>homer take of the year ladies and gentleman. he's not " overvalued " maybe watch him play and his stats + what he accomplished.</div></div>
Why are you so bitter? You clearly don't value Zegras as much as we do/we don't agree that Lane Hutson is worth what you think he's worth. We've stated what we think the trade would require. We can agree to disagree and then move on. Why are you so butt-hurt that we haven't said "yes" to your proposed trade. You do realise even if we did agree to it it still won't make it happen, right?
We'll see what happens, but PV has made it clear that Zegras hasn't been shopped. People called after Servalli made up that Zegras might be moved because he was good friends with Drysdale and Drysdale just got traded. PV took a couple calls. He's not actively looking to move the kid and he had made this clear in multiple interviews of late. Zegras has had a rough season with injury and missed camp due to delays in signing his contract. He'll come back strong next season and we are happy to keep him.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Campabee</b></div><div>Ok, serious question for you, who was the last Habs player in the top 3 for the Calder contention? I will give you a hint, he still wears the Jersey, has always been a fan favorite and wears no. 11. Point is Suzuki, Caufield, Guhle, Slafkovsky and many more Habs greats haven't finished top 3 in calder votes. Hell the last player to actually win the Calder as a Hab was Dryden in 1972. Just cause you don't win or finish top 3 for the Calder literally doesn't mean squat. With guys like Skinner and Tyler Meyers as former winners, just cause you win doesn't mean you will have a long storied career either. Raycroft won in 2004 but didn't even play 300 games in the league. I don't think anyone cares if he finishes top 3 in calder voting or not (McDavid finished 3rd after all) as long as his career tracks the way scouts are projecting it to. Back to back 44+ point seasons in the NCAA, is a pretty good indication that he will likely be as good as Habs fans and analysts project him to be.
Makar - 70 points in 76 gp 0.92 ppg
Fox - 116 points in 97 gp 1.2 ppg
Q. Hughes - 62 points in 69 gp 0.90 ppg
Hutson - 91 points in 71 gp 1.28 ppg
Before you comment on their size compared to Hutson only Makar is significantly bigger (20+ lbs heavier) and the following height and weights are based on this year's measurements, therefore one has to assume all were lighter when they broke into the league as well.
Makar - 5'11 187 lbs
Fox - 5'11" 181 lbs
Q. Hughes - 5'10" 170 lbs
Hutson - 5'10" 163 lbs
BTW, it's not Habs fans making the comparisons to Fox, Makar and Hughes, it's guys like Byron Bader and Hutson's coach Jay Pandalfo and many others. Bader updated Hutson's card this past November and he shows Hutson's NHLe has been higher than both Hughes since his D+1 and was always higher than Fox's but in his D+2 season Hutson has gapped him significantly.
https://twitter.com/ByronMBader/status/1730294069895819402</div></div>
Good indicators. Means nothing until he can prove it at the NHL. Decision-making speed at the NHL is just next level. Why would you want to trade out a player you think is the next Hughes, Fox or Makar??? I wouldn't, even if it was from a position of strength. Keep the guys destined to be Hughes/Fox/Makars and trade everything below, no?
P.S. Zellweger has been a tremendous steal for us. However, most ANA fans accept his shortcomings and he's pretty much been pencilled into a 3LD + PP specialist role. No one was expecting him to become a #1D at the NHL level. Shifty and dynamic 3rd pairing D-man who are serviceable at defending at 5-on-5, but a major threat in the offensive zone and on the PP are significant add to any team (i.e. Ghost, OEL, Gustafsson - all playing on winning sides in 3D + PP roles). Nothing wrong with it and no need to overvalue their potential. They are good players in their own right. Just not worth a top 6 C with back-to-back 60 pts seasons, even if you throw in a late 1st rounder.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>batman</b></div><div>cant wait for y’all to get a pick #18 on draft day after yapping all season longue saying he’s worth more than 2 firsts</div></div>
Why are you so angry? Can you not accept when you someone disagrees with you? Very immature behaviour.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
17 mars à 9 h 39
Sujet:
Z Monahan and Toffoli
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>With your loss tonight, you guys can give up any dreams of getting as high as #8. You'll be #5-#7. And the third is too much.
If the two Russians go in the top 6, we should have a good forward prospect available at #7. (Celebrini, Levshunov, Lindstrom, Demidov, Silayev leaves Eiserman, Helenius, Hemming and Nygard.)</div></div>
Yeh, may be it is just me, but I am not that high on Helenius, Hemming and Nygard. Not to replace Z. Eiserman could be interesting though as a true LW with goal scoring potential, but he's got problems outside of scoring. That said, we could go Lindstrom with our 1st and pick-up Yamenchuk or Parekh if they are still on the board. It really depends on what PV has planned to bolster the D next year. Lev seems like a perfect pick-up for us, but he's got a long road to getting into the NHL. I just wonder whether we go for a forward, with a shorter development time, and solidify the D through FA and/or trade.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 mars à 9 h 32
Sujet:
The Dream
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Goose1227</b></div><div>McTavish is pretty much untouchable, right? Sorry I know not related</div></div>
Agreed. He's a tricky one though. I'd prefer to move him to LW and move Z back to 3C, but McT has had such good chemistry with Vatrano and Strome. Also, he's solid on the dot. He needs to work on his D and perhaps next year is the year he focuses on that. Being a 3C role would provide him more time against some easier match-ups for him to develop those skills... I think that is probably the best way to play it, but I am not a coach.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 mars à 9 h 29
Sujet:
The Dream
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>I would personally send Zell back to the AHL until Fowlers deal is up, he really needs some time to round out his game.</div></div>
Good idea. I think I prefer that actually. That would help shelter Minty a little longer and mean he can develop alongside a true RD. I guess we keep Lindstrom as 3RD then and give Luneau the 20 or so games in order to ease him into the league?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars à 20 h 10
Sujet:
zegras
As a Ducks fan, I'd say "no" to the deal for Z. We either need picks now, but ideally young players with high-end upside. I personally don't see Z going to MTL without Reinbacher+ coming back the other way.
Picks in 2026 mean nothing as we'll be looking to be more competitive then and not drafting more prospects.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars à 20 h 8
Sujet:
Anaheim Fans
Reinbacher+ is probably what it takes.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars à 20 h 6
Sujet:
The Dream
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lancebmx</b></div><div>Many other teams very desperate for a player like him as well. Buffalo, Ottawa, Detroit as example. Could easily see them putting in a high bid.</div></div>
Sure, but are they really in a better position than ANA? I mean they aren't contenders. Again, Roy may prefer a move to a team just coming out of rebuild and that is local to LA to save him from uprooting his family. He's been in LA a while and I'm sure has settled in. If the value of the contract is the same than why not ANA?
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
16 mars à 20 h 3
Sujet:
Z Monahan and Toffoli
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ht42</b></div><div>If MTL won the 1st or the 2nd lottery, we can forget Zegras.</div></div>
I was talking about ANA.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars à 20 h 3
Sujet:
The Dream
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lancebmx</b></div><div>Reported going to 87.7M.</div></div>
Doubt many contenders will be able to offer 6M to a top 4 RD if that is all the cap is going up by. Most are overspent as is and with significant contracts due on other players. Namely the reason he may be available from LA as they've got Byfield to re-sign.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars à 19 h 58
Sujet:
The Dream
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lancebmx</b></div><div>Matt Roy might very well get 6M per year from a contender let alone a rebuilding Ducks team.</div></div>
Possibly. Will depend on what the cap goes up by I guess.
I'd probably pay it. Yes, Ducks are rebuilding, but Matt is local to ANA and so the move would save him from uprooting his family. He may prefer that than chasing a cuo. Not that cup chasing wouldn't be possible in ANA. ANA are probably strong contenders in 2-3 years with Celebrini.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
16 mars à 18 h 56
Sujet:
Z Monahan and Toffoli
Good offer for Z - it would really depend on who was available at #8. I think we'd consider it if a player of interest was available. Big issue is that this is a D heavy top 10 and we really don't need to draft 2 x D. Winning the lottery would obviously have a significant impact on any decision to move Z.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
16 mars à 3 h 58
Sujet:
24-25 idea with Celebrini
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GuyGuyGuy</b></div><div>First of all, Zegras is absolutely not going top 3 in any redraft lol. Hughes, Seider, Boldy, Cozens. 3 easy picks over him. Caufield, Harley and even Dach too. And I did respond to the 0.007 ppg difference by saying it’s minimal and that gms take into account goals more.
Also, if you take a look at some of my comments here, you can clearly see I don’t like Caufield and find him overrated and overhyped. I value defense a lot and Zegras is one of the worst in the league in that department.
Here is a quick look at forwards available in the top 10
Demidov : Clearly better than Zegras. Will probably be at least a ppg player
Eiserman : Goal scorer with tons of talent who will probably score 40 goals
Catton : insane forward with a 70 pts floor
Lindstrom : Physical guy who is a safe option for 60 pts
Helenius : less safe option, but he is pretty good defensively
Brandsegg-Nygaard : safe option for 2nd line
Connelly: basically seen as a responsible defensively Zegras
Igilna: good 2-way forward.
All these guys are pretty safe options to be at least as good as Zegras with a pretty good chance of being better.</div></div>
Hahaha.. okay, kind of proving my point saying that Dach, Harley and Caulfield go over him. I mean you've literally just said that you think Caulfield is over-hyped, doesn't play defence and has scored less points than Z. So the only way he goes ahead of Z is if you have some irrational hatred for Z, which you clearly do. Hughes and Seider are a given, hence why Z goes 3rd, so not much of a gotcha on that one. Fair on Boldy, but Cozens ppg is significantly lower than Z.
I agree, defence is important. But can you not at least acknowledge that scoring 60 PTS in the NHL in back-to-back seasons is an achievement.
Good luck with your pick in the draft. Very optimistic outlooks on those players and obviously assumes they hit their ceilings without injury. Also assumes Z is done developing, which he clearly hasn't. Anyway, I think we are done here. See ya.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
15 mars à 20 h 45
Sujet:
24-25 idea with Celebrini
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GuyGuyGuy</b></div><div>But Debrincat is 10x the player Zegras is. Chicago was also not fireselling, they decided to do so when they traded Debrincat. They made it quite clear Debrincat was available, but only for an overpay. That’s exactly the Zegras situation. For the rexord, I think 10 PA is way too much to give for a player that would be fourth to sixth best forward on the habs and will be fifth or sixth with the Ducks</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GuyGuyGuy</b></div><div>Are you seriously taking +/- to say a player is bad defensively????? That is litterally the worst stat to demonstrated defense. And in real stats (although I do think advanced stats aren’t everything) Zegras is a bottom player defensively.
Yes, Caufield is injury prone. In fact, he is probably injured as of now since he missed several practice due to treatments. And oh, a 0,07 ppg difference is pretty much nothing lol
Also, have you looked at the habs’ defense the last couple years? Saying Anaheim has a bad defense isn’t a reason to justify Zegras horrible defense.
Dach was on pace for 55 pts last year. He has some pretty decent defensive stats. Also, he performed pretty dang good at 2c. Only way he got to play RW was because we had Monahan and Suzuki needed a winger to play with him. Dach has been injury prone for a longer time but it doesn’t change the fact Zegras has been injured A LOT lately.
Caufield has been playing injured (confirmed) for some time last year and he still performed a lot. Weber and Price played the best hockey of his career in the 2021 playoffs while injured. Zegras has really regress. Usually, when you are in a slump, you don’t lose your abilities. You are usually just unlucky. And 20 games is a pretty long slump.
Also, you are talking about me trusting what the medias are saying. Have you ever read an article about Zegras? The journalists are all glazing him and talking about his skills offensively. The medias are the reason he is more overhyped than guys like Necas and Boldy, who are WAY better players.
I would rather trust an insider with insides info about a guy availability than a random guy on internet with no internal info at all and only his convictions to trust</div></div>
I think you just hate Zegras. Kind of irrational logic being applied here. You are welcome to say that you'd prefer XX over Zegras, but the kid who would be 10th OA in this years draft according to some MTL fans (despite it being pretty average after Celebrini and Zegras going 3rd on most 2019 re-drafts) does have 2 x 60 PT seasons under his belt. He's had a down year after missing camp, playing in a new system under a new coach, and playing injured. He's still a good player and only just entering his prime years. He'll be back next year and there is no reason to think he won't perform at least as good as previous years.
I find it so odd how so many fans hate Zegras and are bitter because EA selected him for the cover of a game. What is even more odd is that he's over-hyped because of it... Smh! Anyway, not here to convince you that you should trade Xx for Zegras. Just pointing out that you are being completely illogical. I mean, you didn't even respond to the statement that Zegras is outscoring Caulfield (0.73 ppg vs 0.72). Does that mean Caulfield is trash and over-hyped too? Again, you can have your preferences, but try and bit a little objective in valuing players. If he's not the right fit then fine. If you think Suzuki is better and don't think Zegras would fill a need then fine. No need to go above and beyond to downplay Zegras and his abilities.
P.S. for anyone drafting a forward in this year's draft, you are pretty much hoping they become as good as Zegras. Getting 60 PTS out a player at 20 and 21 years of age isn't typical, even for highly drafted players. Moreover, you could get unlucky and grab a bust (Turcotte, Zadina, Kakko). You'll find them in any draft. I guess you prefer the magic beans to proven talent. Personally, I'd give up 8th OA in this years draft for Zegras, heck I'd do it for Cole too. Getting a solid 2nd liner with a top 10 pick is what you hope for. Go back and look at any draft and you'll see, unless you get lucky or it's a stacked draft, most guys past the top 5 are 2nd liners. Then you've gotta hope they continue to develop, wait for them to develop, hope they don't get a career ending injury, hope they make the jump to the NHL, etc. so muc risk. Each their own I guess.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 févr. à 18 h 16
Sujet:
Young wingers
I wouldn't trade Gibson right now. Dostal clearly has potential, but has been inconsistent at times. Admittedly, the team in front isn't exactly helping him. That said, I'm a huge Gibson fanboy. He's absolutely elite and can turn it on and steal games. You need that for deep playoff runs. Personally, I'd keep Gibson as long as possible as I think he'll be pivotal to the teams progression and any playoff success we might have in the future.
Agreed on splitting Vatrano and Henrique. I'd also prefer to keep Vats around. Like the Kakko addition, but happy to just take a 1st+ for Henrique.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. à 17 h 6
Sujet:
TDL and next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>Because multiple Duck fans claiming NYR fans are the worst to deal with when y’all aren’t making logical trades
I don’t know let me ask you this: if your team needs a top line RW and a 3C, which position would you give up the first round pick for? The RW who’s likely to play 18+ minutes or the 3C who’s likely to play 12+ minutes
I don’t have a specific player in mind, but it would be Eberle/Bjorkstrand, Tarasenko, or whoever</div></div>
I didn't say that. We aren't some homogeneous entity. We are individuals. You are very aggressive and have made some silly statements. However, I don't tarnish every NYR fan with the same brush.
Well, I'd argue that Henrique is pretty versatile and will play more than 12 mins a night as he'll probably be on your PP or PK. You can also double shift him if necessary to get his TOI up if you are concerned about p/60. That said, yeah, I get your position about preferring a natural RW vs a C/LW. Not sure you'll be happy with Eberle, Tarasenko, etc. though, especially if you don't rate Henrique. I mean, Tarasenko and Henrique have similar numbers this year and Eberle has lower numbers and is kind of one dimensional. However, I respect your suggested targets and think they are a good choice for a 1st.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. à 16 h 33
Sujet:
TDL and next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>Yea because trading a 1st for a 3C who probably won’t play much or get powerplay time is a waste of a 1st. The Rangers first should be going for a top line RW
The whole point of this is you guys crapping on Kakko when no one is forcing y’all to take him and the rangers need him more, on top of the fact that playoff teams don’t trade away roster players
If the rangers have picks available, then that’s what they’ll trade. You don’t trade 3RW for 3C while losing a pick in the process</div></div>
I mean CHI traded a 1st for Vermette, a 3C who didn't get any PP time and won the SC. Vermette played a pivotal role because of his FO and PK ability. In fact, ANA was in the running for Vermette, but lost out because we weren't willing to give up a 1st. We then lost to CHI in a very close WCF where Vermette played a pivotal role winning defensive zone faceoffs and shutting down our 2nd line. Not trying to convince you accept Henrique, I can see your mind is made up on that one. The point is that a 1st for a 3C has happened and they can be impact players who take your team over the edge.
I haven't crapped on him. Why you being so aggressive towards me and calling me an idiot. Just totally unnecessary. If you don't like the opinion of Duck fans, why come over to our threads. Just don't engage. Simple.
What deals do you have in mind for that top line RW? I assume there will be a significant add to the 1st to land a top line RW. Can't see anyone interested in giving up a top line RW where the main asset is a late, late 1st.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Goalie</b></div><div>futures, drury prob wont shop a first and kakko definitely wont be shopped unless its something worth our time not an aging 3c in henrique lol. kakko + first would be the start for a zegras package if that were to happen.</div></div>
What's the game plan then? For fans, you don't seem very interested in seeing your team go for it and potentially win the cup. Even if it is a long shot everyone has a chance in the playoffs. Not really following what you want? Don't want to commit, but don't suck enough to get high picks. *Shrug*
Nah... Not even close. Zegras isn't available anyway. That was just some nonsense Seravalli said after the Drysdale trade for clicks. He's not in with the ANA crowd (Pierre LeBrun and Kevin Weekes are though). Even if Zegras was available, it would need to be a hockey trade and a 1-for-1, maybe with a small add.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. à 15 h 25
Sujet:
TDL and next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>Lmao both brodzinski and Henrique both wouldn’t be playing in the top 6. The WHOLE point of this is why does Kakko have to be included in a trade for Henrique….. Playoff teams don’t trade roster players for a rental when they have picks readily available. Just accept the 1st round pick and move on
Damn I know you would run an undefeated team with the kind of moves like trading Kakko for an aging rental and signing Phil Kessel 😂😂😂😂</div></div>
Calm down brah... No need to call ppl stupid or idiots. It's just a forum. Don't be one of "those" fans.
A 1st for Henrique works for me too. I'm really not that high on Kakko. Henrique just seemed a good fit and reports coming out of NYR camp is they don't want to move a 1st.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>Weird if Kakko sucks so bad and he’s truly a bust, wouldn’t you rather have a 1st for Rico? Damn all you Ducks fans aren’t that smart
And once again, learn how to operate a team. It’s pretty common sense</div></div>
NYR 1st it is then! Deal!
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Goalie</b></div><div>We need right wingers just as bad as we need 3Cs lol… you’re not getting kakko for a 3c rental…</div></div>
Okay, not many options in that case. What's the plan then?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. à 13 h 20
Sujet:
Why We Wont Be Trading Trevor Zegras Anytime Soon
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>I don't want McTavish on the third line -- that's the perfect place to break Gauthier in without overexposing him. With veterans on either side of him, he'll do fine in the middle. Putting him with two young guys who are still learning how to play a 200-foot game seems like a very bad idea to me.</div></div>
Fair enough. I don't think Gauthier is a C. He's a shooter with good positioning, but from what I've seen he can't drive the play like a McTavish, Celebrini or Carlsson. Maybe he learns? If you want to shelter him than move him down the lines on the W. It is easier to shelter a W than a C.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. à 13 h 16
Sujet:
TDL and next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>They don’t “need” a replacement for chytil, especially if that’s the price for it lol<strong> Henrique is barely an upgrade over brodzinski </strong>
Right now they haven’t looked good so there’s no need to go all in. Secondly, you don’t give up a roster player to fill a hole. Rangers trade Kakko and now they need a RW. If the rangers want Rico, it’ll be for picks</div></div>
Hmmmm... I see you are one of those fans. No point arguing with someone who thinks a borderline NHLer is better than a career NHLer with a proven track record. I mean, Henrique has more than double the points and 3 times the goals of Brodzinski. Anyway...... no point in arguing, you believe what you want. I'm not going to change that, even if I bring a logical argument to the table.
Okay, understood. FWIW, Kakko is more likely to stay than go I guess. Tough to make deals that everyone is happy with.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>Rangers fans are still adamant that Kakko can be a top 6 winger and would rather ride him to the AHL than trade him out and see him succeed elsewhere.
As a general rule of thumb, done make ACGMs with trades to NYR or TOR, their fan bases on here make it not worth the hassle.</div></div>
I don't think it is all NYR or TOR fans, just certain ones in particular. This Rags21 is definitely one of those. I mean, "Henrique is barely an upgrade over Brodzinski". You can't even have a polite debate with such fans. Oh well.
I'm not even fussed about Kakko. Just thought he sounded like a Silf replacement. Doubt Henrique goes for anything less a 1st, but Kakko + 2nd seemed like an equivalent deal and I think NYR would benefit from Henrique. Nevermind. We'll see what unfolds.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. à 12 h 51
Sujet:
TDL and next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>Keep dreaming Ducks fans lol</div></div>
What would you do instead? I mean, you need a replacement for Chytil, no? Or you don't think NYR has a chance at the cup and so don't want to invest in players for a serious cup run?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. à 12 h 48
Sujet:
Why We Wont Be Trading Trevor Zegras Anytime Soon
I don't think you go with that line-up if you get Celebrini. Cutter isn't a centre, that is for sure.
Zegras - Carlsson - Cutter
Killhorn - Celebrini - Terry
Vatrano - McTavish - Strome
I would think is your top 9. That said, I think you seriously have to consider moving someone out for help at RD if you get Celebrini (probably Z as McTavish is more of a need as a scorer who can convert to wing and play C in a pinch). We can't afford to have Carlsson, Celebrini, Z, McTavish, Terry, and Cutter - I'd imagine all will want $7-12 mil each at some point. Not to mention that Minty might demand a pretty penny once/if he solidifies himself.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 mars 2022 à 19 h 31
Sujet:
Next Year
I'm over Fleury. He's looked very average in SEA. LaCombe is also definitely destined for the AHL first. Don't hate the money on the Milano contract, but I'd only do 2-3 years max.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com