SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Drakin1978

Membre depuis
15 janv. 2018
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Messages dans les forums
430
Messages par jour
0.2
Forum: Armchair-GM25 nov. 2021 à 13 h 17
1) with berg gone next year he should not be making decision on the future of the club at all.
2) KK was worth 2.8 at the top end. He is a 4th liner in Carolina and we tried to hide him in the playoffs he should have never been picked in the first place he was top ranked at 10th.
3) Danault and Dvorak have very similar stats this year except for the -15 difference in +/- but that has a lot to do with our ****ty defense. Dvorak is younger and cheaper. When Danault was up for negotiations and rumors of what he was offered people were calling for him to just leave he isn't worth it. When MTL was looking to trade for Dvorak and the offers were being speculated , what was actually paid was deemed not enough to get him. People seem to think they know or have opinions but quickly start taking a different side when things happen. Not we should have kept danault and Dvorak wasnt worth what the habs paid for him. You can't have it both ways.
4) chariot is not worth a early - mid 1st in my mind, but Edmonton has the potential to go very far in the playoffs Chiarot retained however is worth a late 1st if not more. Lavoie is a good prospect, inconsistent, poor defensively and plays the wrong wing for the habs, he is a project with upside. The habs might need to add to the trade but its close.

Offseason for the habs
Dvorak = Danault
Hoffman > tatar
KK (no replacement) Need to have a player to play 3c/2c
savard + Wideman does not equal Weber bad additions
perrault bad addition
paquette bad addition
sam montebault bad addition
Sami Niku good potential ( if rebuilding) don't mind the addition

No price
No edmonson
No byron

team would and could be be better
Forum: Armchair-GM18 nov. 2021 à 2 h 21
Forum: Armchair-GM18 nov. 2021 à 1 h 54
Forum: Armchair-GM16 nov. 2021 à 13 h 36
Sujet: Chariot
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Duggysdanglers</b></div><div>That’s 2 second round picks and a depth D for a rental. I know the Oilers need a D like Chiarot pretty bad imo but that’s a huge price tag. Benson has been developing within the system for a while and he’s starting to get regular minutes on the 4th line do they’ll likely keep him.
Maybe they should offer Kris Russell, Lavoie and a 2nd or 3rd instead. KR can be easily flipped for another pick at the TDL. Not sure what the Habs need besides a resurrected Carey Price to change their fortunes. They have loads of picks and prospects depth so what else do they need??</div></div>

they need a full rebuild in my eyes but barring that, lavoie + lagesson + second for chairot 50% retained? I think lavoie needs to fix his defensive issues and consistency to make the nhl so thast a project nut i do like him (he is a rw and we have a lot there lw would be preferable but i like the guy) , lagesson would be and AHL caliber d-man right now with posibility of being a decent a 3rd pair in the future, no PP or PK. I think keeping Russel and his ability to block shots and move the puck as your depth d-man is the best option to help win a cup in edmonton for the blue line.

If Edmonton wins the cup or finishes anywhere near where they are now that second is real real late so i beleive the ask is fair value with substitution benson for lavoie , when I said Benson it was his potential and LW and i though he sloted behind perlini on the 4th line and made him available