SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Canucks33

Membre depuis
15 déc. 2017
Équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
3214
Messages par jour
1.4
Forum: Armchair-GMsam. à 23 h 45
Sujet: Could they be moved
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FoxYou727</b></div><div>Pulock is an interesting trade idea. I see a lot of Jets fans proposing an Ehlers for Pulock swap so that gives you a base for value. Hoglander would be the main piece I'd want personally, I'd be fine taking a contract back too + 1st. Maybe I am overvaluing him but RD are apparently the hardest position to find which I find strange considering 80% of the world is right handed</div></div>

Directly matching Ehlers-Pulock for the Canucks would probably be Boeser-Pulock, but the Canucks can't afford to give up their only true scoring winger.

I'd consider something around Hoglander but I'm not sure it would be worth it move a young, effective, cost controlled player for a 30+ player. It would be a big hit to move him along with a 1st. For a contract going back it would likely be Mikheyev. For it to be appealing for the Canucks the structure of the deal would be something like Mikheyev + Podkolzin + 1st 2025 + 2nd 2025. You could choose any prospect other than Lekkerimaki or Wallinder.

You could probably get Marner for him though.
Forum: Armchair-GM18 avr. à 15 h 41
Forum: Armchair-GM13 avr. à 0 h 33
Sujet: Thanks09 Guy
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Batherson probably has more value than Boeser though because he has 3 more years on his contract at a cheap cap hit while Boeser is a UFA after next season</div></div>

I believe that Boeser will take a long term deal at low cap hit to stay in VAN similar to RNH. Something like 8 years at 6M-7M, which would be a bargain deal and below market value. Independent of that I don't like sending out that many assets for a non-impact player at a non-premium position.

One of the characteristics of Rutherford teams is the defense is pretty inexpensive and doesn't require super high end players all over to be effective. We got our stud #1 and they are content to fill holes around that with different types of players like Zadorov and Soucy. Hronek might push it but I don't think they'd be looking at burning assets on another defenseman, more likely a forward. Simply re-signing Zadorov would be a much better move for the organization in my eyes.

I think this team is very solid though.
Forum: Armchair-GM9 avr. à 23 h 38
Sujet: Big Move
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>StutzlesNumber1Fan</b></div><div>Brady is worth more than just Willander lol. Everyone will always over value their own players on here so it's pretty impossible to get realistic trades. Like I would want Lekkerimaki + Willander for Brady + JBD but Sens fans will say its not enough and Canucks fans will say its way to much.</div></div>

When's the last time two A prospects were packaged together? I understand that would be your ask but you have to understand that its not happening.

As good as Brady is he's a winger, teams pay premiums for C's and RHDs. Brady is a top tier player and a unicorn style wise but his cap hit isn't small either. Hronek is a top tier asset being a RHD, balances the cap and fills an organizational need for you. I'm not sure there's going to be a much better single asset out there. Throw in an A prospect a 1st and the deal is already overflowing with value you. I'd be surprised if two of them were included in a deal let alone three.
Forum: Armchair-GM5 avr. à 17 h 17