PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
Canucks33
Membre depuis
15 déc. 2017
Équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
3207
Messages par jour
1.4
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 avr. à 1 h 58
Sujet:
Playoff Lines
I think we’re gonna run Petey-Miller-Lindholm-Blueger at center. But I’d love to see how a Miller-Lindholm-Boeser line looks
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 avr. à 15 h 9
Sujet:
Hart Rankings
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>that's the wrong question. the right question is, is goaltending underrated.</div></div>
I don't think that it's underrated... it's just hard sometimes to tell when the defensive system stops and the goaltending begins in terms of contribution to team success
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 mars à 23 h 48
Sujet:
4 Million Dollar Team
RyJo's so nice he could be on here twice!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 mars à 20 h 45
Sujet:
TEAM A
team B
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 mars à 2 h 20
Sujet:
werent there like 5 or 6 injuries a couple of weeks ago
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canucks33</b></div><div>Would Martinez be in over Hague?
Stephenson on the 4th line? Roy and Howden scratched and Dorofeyev in?</div></div>
As far as who plays on D is concerned, Hanifin-Pietrangelo and McNabb-Theodore are locked in as the top 2 pairs and I could see any of Martinez, Hague, Whitecloud, and Hutton utilized for the third pair.
Forward lines are a mess after the first line. Stephenson probably draws second line with whoever they want between him and Hertl playing center. Third line being Mantha-Karlsson-Amadio and fourth being Carrier-Roy-Kolesar. This all of course assumes full health
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 mars à 0 h 29
Sujet:
Buffalo are only couple pieces away from being a threat
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canucks33</b></div><div>Is a new coach not the first thing Buffalo should be looking for?</div></div>
Honestly, I think Granato is a good coach, but I think the issue is the assistants and the roster. There are too many friends of the coach and GM on the staff and as result, there’s a lack of experience behind the bench.
The team rallied back into the playoff race behind their coach, they certainly haven’t quit on him, and I think he’s done what he can we what he was given. The star players on this team that are well paid have just not been executing, it’s a down year for several guys from a shooting standpoint, and now although we added to the D and solidified it, we now are in dire need of a third line center,
But the bigger issue is the GM. Granato has to coach the team that he was given, and the biggest mistake of the offseason was Adams doing to little to nothing to add to they roster when it needed help, especially when Jack Quinn went down.
Not to mention, the owner won’t do it. The biggest problem of all is the owner.
If they fire Don Granato, they’ll end up with Seth Appert as coach. Thats the Terry Pegula way, because he doesn’t want to pay multiple coaches to not coach.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 mars à 21 h 4
Sujet:
Kotkaniemi Wants to Stay a Cane
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canucks33</b></div><div>I've heard that Kuznetsov has looked great in Carolina, is that true?</div></div>
He's looked great but he needs to get his stamina up. Him and Necas have a lot of chemistry
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 févr. à 1 h 26
Sujet:
BEST TEAM POSSIBLE
flyers beat this team in 4 i fear
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 févr. à 22 h 13
Sujet:
I Should Be Restrained
If they sell, that would probably do it
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 févr. à 14 h 56
Sujet:
Team B
I would take this team being the better team. Ovi is not the same player he used to be. For what it is worth I would take the other teams D core though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
31 janv. à 20 h 21
Sujet:
Role Players
O'Reilly
Compher
Coyle
Carlo
Jenner
Foligno
Gourde
just to name a few def misses...........
Forum:
Armchair-GM
31 janv. à 19 h 33
Sujet:
Role Players
Artturi Lehkonen, though he’s (rightfully) perceived more like an actual impact player recently.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
31 janv. à 18 h 53
Sujet:
Role Players
I got a lot of personal bias here, but Colton Sissons totally deserves to be on a list like this. He’s been the Preds most trusted defensive C for years and a face off ace. I don’t remember exactly what Laviolette said during the Stanley cup run in 2017, but it was to this effect: “I got a guy I can always trust to take those defensive zone draws in late game situations. It’s Colton Sissons.” He’s always just been a solid presence. There’s a reason all Lavi, Hynes, and Bruno have loved him.
But this is a great list, but I think there’s something to be said for adding PP specialists to this list. The ability to consistently help your team cash out on the PP can’t be understated
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 janv. à 9 h 24
Sujet:
Which Team is Better Team A
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>team A</div></div>
Yea easily
Forum:
Armchair-GM
26 janv. à 23 h 12
Sujet:
Which Team is Better Team A
team A
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 janv. à 23 h 23
Sujet:
All In But Responsibly
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>1st > Monahan
3rd > Kovacevic
4th + McDonough > nothing
Canucks pass on that trade easily
Tarasenko gets a better return</div></div>
I'd say 1st for Monahan is an overpayment as well. He's worth a 2nd at the absolute max. The ony part that's possibly the right value is Kovacevic for a 3rd.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 janv. à 23 h 15
Sujet:
All In But Responsibly
Miki-Monahan-Tank could be interesting w/ lotto
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 janv. à 23 h 8
Sujet:
All In But Responsibly
1st > Monahan
3rd > Kovacevic
4th + McDonough > nothing
Canucks pass on that trade easily
Tarasenko gets a better return
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 janv. à 22 h 58
Sujet:
something a little different
Kuzmenko >>>>> Anderson
1st >>>>> 3rd
4th >> 6th
Literally zero reason for the Canucks to do this. Makes the team a lot worse while losing a 1st round pick
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 déc. 2023 à 17 h 45
Sujet:
Maybe the defense will be ok
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Big_Rock_Brock</b></div><div>basing it off the report Kuzmenko is being shopped, you free up the cap for next year and get 2 young pieces who are NHL ready. They aint superstars but you get cap space and nhlers</div></div>
Teams are calling. He's not being shopped. Plus the team isn't looking to next year. They already have Myers, and other pieces, coming off the books so cap is fine.
My problem with Walhlstrom is he isn't going to makeup where Kuz is lacking, despite his size, and lose production offensively in top of it.
Bolduc and Walhlstrom just aren't exciting and do nothing for the team now.
Bolduc has zero chance of playing in Van despite being potentially ready with Hughes, Cole, Z and Soucy all ahead on the left. Along with other prospects coming up.
This might be a better package elsewhere. Value isn't necessarily bad but not good for Van for what the pieces are.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 déc. 2023 à 1 h 7
Sujet:
LLBB
VAN would NEVER consider that Fabbro trade
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 déc. 2023 à 23 h 12
Sujet:
Next Up Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canucks33</b></div><div>Taking on the Garland contract is a fair point and requires some value attached to it besides STL hypothetically liking him as a player. But also consider that
a) Buch has a M-NTC (could angle his way to 2-4 particular teams)
b) Most teams that would be interested in Buch do not have cap space (this was listed as a major reason why we got Zadorov for cheap despite CGY not wanting to move him to us)
c) Other interested teams may not have prospects as good as Lekkerimaki or a contract they can easily move to make cap space.
The thing with Willander and Bruscewitz is that they are RHD, which is a premium asset and the kind that never gets moved. Every team in the league that offered a valuable piece to NYR in the last 2-3 years has asked for Schneider (including us with Miller probably) and it hasn't happened, young RHD just don't get moved. Consider further that RHD is an area of need for VAN and we have barely had any in the system at all over the last number of years, let alone prospects as good as those guys look right now. I don't think they can be compared to the Makmahdullin or Ohkotiuk (especially cause SJS clearly went for quantity over quality in that specific deal). I understand Buch is a premier asset and you have to ask high, but in reality VAN isn't including one of those guys let alone both.
I think Garland + Lekkerimaki + 1st 2024 for Buch is at least a solid framework for a deal with the understanding that the market will dictate if anything else needs to be added.</div></div>
While I mostly agree with you. RHD wasn’t the focal point but however is the focal point of your prospect group. We are just so stocked at forward prospects that it shouldn’t be a priority. Kyrou and Thomas are signed for 8. Schenn for 4-5. Neighbors looks great so far. Then we have Dvorsky, Snuggerud, Bolduc, Stenberg and Dean who are likely to become NHLers.
It’s a good fit but a bad fit if premiums are being thrown on.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 déc. 2023 à 18 h 25
Sujet:
Next Up Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canucks33</b></div><div>So you would ask for 1st 2024 + 1st/2nd 2025 + Willander/Lekkerimaki + Woo/Bruscewitz? I understand that you aim high but that's ridiculous.
I understand that there's no reason to move Buch and you'd be happy to keep him. But what are the odds that a) Buch wants to re-sign in STL and b) STL wants to commit big money and term to a 30 year old winger?</div></div>
Not sure. But in all reality that’s a very similar return that I asked for that Timo Meier got as an expiring RFA with a 10m QO. You’re asking for an 1st liner at half of a normal 1st liners cap hit all while having us take on additional year on the Garland contract which is an ok contract but certainly does nothing to help us reach our goals.
Hell what you proposed is much worse than Horvat just netted you guys as an expiring UFA.
Baseline for my thinking was
Willander > Mukmahdullin
Woo/Brusc = Ohkotiuk
Johnsson was a one year cap dump not 3
And there’s no Zetterlund
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 déc. 2023 à 16 h 43
Sujet:
Next Up Buch
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canucks33</b></div><div>So you would ask for 1st 2024 + 1st/2nd 2025 + Willander/Lekkerimaki + Woo/Bruscewitz? I understand that you aim high but that's ridiculous.
I understand that there's no reason to move Buch and you'd be happy to keep him. But what are the odds that a) Buch wants to re-sign in STL and b) STL wants to commit big money and term to a 30 year old winger?</div></div>
I think Buch would be happy to come back to St. Louis but I agree I'm not sure the Blues want to go long term with him as he doesn't really fit our window for contention.
I think realistically if the trade is with Vancouver, the Blues will want Lekkerimaki or Willander coming back. Now if either of those 2 are in the package I don't think it's going to be a TON else like listed above but still if the Blues decide to trade Buch there will be a bidding war for him and the Blues will likely get a ton. So a teams top prospects have to be on the table in a serious discussion.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 nov. 2023 à 17 h 53
Sujet:
What would u offer for any of these players in a retool
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canucks33</b></div><div>What's the value on Chabot? Injury history might make him somewhat attainable.</div></div>
I’d assume itll look like:
4-5 mill in cap back (Garland) + B+ prospect + 1st
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com