PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Utah Hockey Club
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Utah Hockey Club
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
BBB22
Bruins2016/17
Membre depuis
4 mai 2016
Équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Messages dans les forums
109
Messages par jour
0.0
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 août 2016 à 18 h 39
Sujet:
What would it take for Lindholm?
Love/hate Marchand also but this next deal he signs is going to be the one (IMO) "smart" teams avoid. He's coming off an extremely good year in which i think he over achieved so his base cap hit he will be asking for will be high especially if he has another good year. Like 7M+ high. Now add in the fact that they'll probably have to get him for 7-8 years i would think. Throw in a NMC as well. That's a contract that looks good now but not so good when hes 35.
If he's willing to take less than market value, then by all means lock him up long term. IMO at best he should get what Lucic got in Edmonton. Give or take an extra 250K. Him getting more than Bergeron just seems wrong but that's just me.[/quote]
I agree with you here. I think Marchand is their best trade chip right now, and when you combine that with the Bruins not really being cup contenders this year, I'd rather see them stack the deck with more top end younger talent, as they bridge to the next generation. I'd rather trade him now while his value is high, because otherwise, I think they will end up severely over-paying for mediocre performance from him down the road. I would imagine he will command 6-7 years at $7 mill per year. Once he gets paid - I don't see him scoring 35 goals + each year. I just don't think he's worth the risk.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2016 à 17 h 3
Sujet:
Stamkos is the direct injection they need
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Double_G93</b></div><div><i>Why would Boston only take a 3rd round pick for both Hayes and Seidenberg? Boston would be looking for a little more in return.</i></div></div>
If the B's could get a 3rd rounder for those two, they would have a parade down Causeway Street
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2016 à 16 h 42
Sujet:
Stamkos is the direct injection they need
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsForTheWin</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BBB22</b></div><div><i><a href="http://globalnews.ca/news/1840707/many-nhl-players-not-keen-on-playing-in-canadian-cities-survey/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://globalnews.ca/news/1840707/many-nhl-players-not-keen-on-playing-in-canadian-cities-survey/</a></i></div></div> I buy that, but I also think Krejci put up the most points of his career with Ryder and Wheeler as his wings, so he might have more interest in playing in wpg on Wheeler's line then the majority of #1 C's in the league.</i></div></div>
No chance that sells him. He gets paid the same, no matter who he plays with for the next five years. First and foremost, he's going to want to go a place that he, and his wife, will want to live. When they shop a guy for a trade with a NTC, they get a list from him beforehand of teams he is willing to go. No chance, Krejci would put Winnipeg on his list.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2016 à 16 h 26
Sujet:
Stamkos is the direct injection they need
<a href="http://globalnews.ca/news/1840707/many-nhl-players-not-keen-on-playing-in-canadian-cities-survey/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://globalnews.ca/news/1840707/many-nhl-players-not-keen-on-playing-in-canadian-cities-survey/</a>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2016 à 16 h 24
Sujet:
Stamkos is the direct injection they need
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BBB22</b></div><div><i>Krejci has a no movement clause, and no way he approves of a trade to Winnipeg.</i></div></div>
Care to share a link on this?</i></div></div>
I don't think the question has ever been posed to him, so I don't know why their would be a link on it. Just common sense. It's not a secret that players don't want to live in Winnipeg or Edmonton. That's why those teams have such a hard time signing free agents.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2016 à 15 h 48
Sujet:
Stamkos is the direct injection they need
Krejci has a no movement clause, and no way he approves of a trade to Winnipeg.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2016 à 12 h 57
Sujet:
Stamkos & a Krejci trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Barathrum_Obama</b></div><div><i>Minnesota will take this and run with it.
fast.</i></div></div>
If B's are lucky enough to land Stamkos, I think they will be happy to part ways with Krejci's contract, and they need help at D. Maybe the B's demand more picks. But the B's unloading his contract will be a win in itself.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2016 à 11 h 20
Sujet:
Bruins Stamkos
I don't entirely disagree with you, but I see Krejci as a #1 center for the bottom half of the league. I see him as more as a top end #2 center. But if they can move Krecji for a good dman, I am all for moving him over Marchand. I just see his situation as being more difficult to find a trade partner. I think a team with a dman the Bruins want (Fowler or Shattenkirk) would look at Krejci's contract and upside, and would rather trade Fowler or Shatt for a younger guy plus a pick or two.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2016 à 11 h 10
Sujet:
Stammer Shat B's
I think Winnipeg would be a team that Krejci invokes his no movement clause and prevents a deal from happening. Minnesota may be more realistic.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2016 à 10 h 34
Sujet:
Stammer Shat B's
Why do people think St. Louis is going to want Krecji? If they lose Backes, which would create a hole at center, it means that they didn't want to pay Backes $24 mill for 4 years. So what makes people think that they would want to pay Krecji at $36.25 mill for 5 years, AND give up Shattenkirk to do so?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 juin 2016 à 7 h 30
Sujet:
Bruins Stamkos
I just think it'll be difficult to find a trade partner for Krecji. His no movement clause, and contract will make it difficult to move him. And he can play right wing - no need to keep him at C.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 juin 2016 à 23 h 9
Sujet:
Stamkos & Shattenkirk
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsForTheWin</b></div><div><i>Anaheim should basically dump Fowler for futures, like STL should do with Shattenkirk. Both teams have serious Fwd holes and an abundance of dmen. They could use the extra cap to resign players like Perron, McGinn for Ana and Backes or Brouwer for STL. Plus Theodore is ready to get action, as is Schmaltz.</i></div></div>
Im not sure exactly how to handicap the trade value, but I think your assessment is off. St. Louis was looking for both Bruins 1st rounders + Patranak for Shattenkirk. One would assume, Anaheim would be seeking similar package for Fowler, especially since any team Fowler goes to, would have him locked up for 2 years. If Bruins sign Stamkos then I think it would make sense to reallocate $4 mill of value from Marchand down to their Defense. Especially since it'll be very difficult to sign Marchand next year, if they have Stamkos' contract.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 juin 2016 à 22 h 24
Sujet:
Stamkos & Shattenkirk
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mkgcanada</b></div><div><i>Retahd. All I need to say.</i></div></div>
I assume you don't like the idea of trading Marchand?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 juin 2016 à 21 h 29
Sujet:
Bruins Stamkos
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BBB22</b></div><div><i>If they get Stamkos, and Vesey - id rather them trade Marchand then Krejci. Either way, I'm starting to think this Stamkos talk may be legit.</i></div></div>
That thinking just doesn't make sense.</i></div></div>
Why not? Marchand's value is as high as it ever has been, and with Stamkos' contract, it will make it difficult to resign Marchand next year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 juin 2016 à 21 h 27
Sujet:
Can't be this lucky
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dpdan</b></div><div><i>Would have to do some high wire acts with resigning March, Spooner, Pasta, but worry about that next year.</i></div></div>
If they get Stamkos, this is why I think it would make sense to trade Marchand now. Trade him for a player still on an entry level deal, and a pick.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 juin 2016 à 21 h 23
Sujet:
Without Stamkos
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsForTheWin</b></div><div><i>Kelly should litterally be on a 2way contract for one year. He still owes us production from that 3m/Year deal. I don't like Campbell at 2 years and think he wants to go for a cup. I also don't see us giving up on Connolly yet. He was good on the 4th line. Everything else looks good.</i></div></div>
They already gave up on Connolly. He wasn't QO'd</i></div></div>
Doesn't mean they've given up on him. Not qualifying him means he'll get to see what his market value is. He may very well end up back with the Bruins - at their price and not his. Unless someone over pays for him .
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 juin 2016 à 18 h 59
Sujet:
Bruins Stamkos
If they get Stamkos, and Vesey - id rather them trade Marchand then Krejci. Either way, I'm starting to think this Stamkos talk may be legit.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 juin 2016 à 12 h 0
Sujet:
2016-2017 Jones & Shattenkirk
Do it anyways. Jam them on the cap
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 juin 2016 à 11 h 50
Sujet:
2016-2017 Jones & Shattenkirk
To the Bruins - yes. It's basically their only way right now to secure a potential franchise dman. They will have picked 5 1st rounders in the past 2 years after tonight. They're a team stuck in mediocrity right now and won't get a player with the upside of Jones picking in the mid teens the next 4 years. If they offer lower money - then I think Columbus matches.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 juin 2016 à 10 h 26
Sujet:
2016-2017 Wild Moves
Thanks for the update, chico. Already outlined that in prior postings. Even so, it looks like a not-so-bad option for the Bruins though. After tonight, they will have selected 5 1st round picks in the past two years, which helps soften the blow a bit. There other option is to send 1 1st round pick + a Vatrano to the Blues for Shattenkirk, who has less of an upside and may only be on the team for one year. I think the Jones move makes more sense.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 juin 2016 à 8 h 58
Sujet:
2016-17
I hope they don't move him either. Not a huge fan of Kulikov either.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 juin 2016 à 17 h 11
Sujet:
Sabres
No faith in them signing Vesey?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 juin 2016 à 16 h 48
Sujet:
Trade for Shattenkirk and Fowler
Neither of those trades get it done. If you trade for Fowler and Shattenkirk, you're gonna have to give up your two 1st round picks this year + 2 NHL ready prospects (Vatrano + Spooner). Which would leave some serious holes in the forwards.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 juin 2016 à 13 h 10
Sujet:
2016-2017 JONES
I agree that there is an unspoken code around the league among GM's not to offer sheet. But Bruins are desperate, so ya never know.
If they offer sheet Jones, and CBJ matches it, is Jones required to stay in CBJ or can he make a choice?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 juin 2016 à 10 h 33
Sujet:
2016-2017 JONES
Ya, it would be 4 first's.
It would definitely be an over-payment, but after Friday, they will have 5 1st rd picks in the pipeline from the past two years, which helps lessen the blow a bit. If they went this route, they wouldn't have to give up younger guys for this upcoming season (Vatrano, Spooner) for a Shattenkirk, either. Leaves you a little light on the wings, as you wouldn't be able to spend money there to bring in a free agent, but having a chance to see Vatrano play a full season in a top 6 role probably isn't a bad thing.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com