SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2016-2017 JONES

Créé par: BBB22
Équipe: 2016-17 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 23 juin 2016
Publié: 23 juin 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
78 750 000 $
55 250 000 $
2850 000 $
11 025 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 750 000 $
Transactions
BOS
    2016 5th round pick
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2373 000 000 $67 892 500 $0 $1 405 000 $5 107 500 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
    AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    625 000 $625 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    742 500 $742 500 $ (Bonis de performance232 500 $$232K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 3
    872 500 $872 500 $ (Bonis de performance157 500 $$158K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    737 500 $737 500 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    6 916 667 $6 916 667 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    8 750 000 $8 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    G
    UFA - 1
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    23 juin 2016 à 9 h 34
    #1
    BreKel
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 3,537
    Mentions "j'aime": 460
    Is that still 4 first round picks? I love the outside-the-box thinking on Jones, and even though it rarely happens, this would be a way to fix the defense. That said, is Jones really worth overspending for like that?
    23 juin 2016 à 10 h 33
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Bruins2016/17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 109
    Mentions "j'aime": 3
    Ya, it would be 4 first's.

    It would definitely be an over-payment, but after Friday, they will have 5 1st rd picks in the pipeline from the past two years, which helps lessen the blow a bit. If they went this route, they wouldn't have to give up younger guys for this upcoming season (Vatrano, Spooner) for a Shattenkirk, either. Leaves you a little light on the wings, as you wouldn't be able to spend money there to bring in a free agent, but having a chance to see Vatrano play a full season in a top 6 role probably isn't a bad thing.
    23 juin 2016 à 11 h 21
    #3
    BreKel
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 3,537
    Mentions "j'aime": 460
    Quoting: BBB22
    Ya, it would be 4 first's.

    It would definitely be an over-payment, but after Friday, they will have 5 1st rd picks in the pipeline from the past two years, which helps lessen the blow a bit. If they went this route, they wouldn't have to give up younger guys for this upcoming season (Vatrano, Spooner) for a Shattenkirk, either. Leaves you a little light on the wings, as you wouldn't be able to spend money there to bring in a free agent, but having a chance to see Vatrano play a full season in a top 6 role probably isn't a bad thing.


    I see. I'm all for something like this. Wish the NHL GMs didn't seem to have this under-the-table agreement with each other to stand clear of RFA's. I get you don't want people offer-sheeting your players, but it would really add another element to free agency if RFA's were actually a legit option (not via trading for).

    Wouldn't you rather offersheet a guy like Lindholm though? I feel you wouldn't go wrong with either player. Unless you like Jones' style and fit more (being a right shot adds a lot more value to it).
    23 juin 2016 à 11 h 52
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 8,230
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,643
    Quoting: BreKel


    I see. I'm all for something like this. Wish the NHL GMs didn't seem to have this under-the-table agreement with each other to stand clear of RFA's. I get you don't want people offer-sheeting your players, but it would really add another element to free agency if RFA's were actually a legit option (not via trading for).

    Wouldn't you rather offersheet a guy like Lindholm though? I feel you wouldn't go wrong with either player. Unless you like Jones' style and fit more (being a right shot adds a lot more value to it).


    It's up to the player to accept an offer sheet (they can use offers as a negotiation tool). Each team can only have one offer sheet out at a time that involve the same picks. There are 7 teams that can't offer an offersheet that involves a next year's 2nd. Half the teams can't really afford a high priced offer sheet.
    23 juin 2016 à 13 h 10
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Bruins2016/17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 109
    Mentions "j'aime": 3
    I agree that there is an unspoken code around the league among GM's not to offer sheet. But Bruins are desperate, so ya never know.

    If they offer sheet Jones, and CBJ matches it, is Jones required to stay in CBJ or can he make a choice?
    23 juin 2016 à 13 h 28
    #6
    BreKel
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 3,537
    Mentions "j'aime": 460
    Quoting: BBB22
    I agree that there is an unspoken code around the league among GM's not to offer sheet. But Bruins are desperate, so ya never know.

    If they offer sheet Jones, and CBJ matches it, is Jones required to stay in CBJ or can he make a choice?


    he has no choice. He has to stay in CBJ.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage