SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Drurys Tweaks and Draft Picks

Créé par: jjvatore11
Équipe: 2024-25 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 24 juin 2024
Publié: 24 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 875 000 $
21 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
43 125 000 $
12 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
24 1st Rd Pick LHD, 24
1800 000 $
24 2nd Rd Pick C, 24
1800 000 $
24 2nd Rd Pick RHD, 24
1800 000 $
24 4th Rd Pick G, 24
1800 000 $
24 5th Rd Pick RW, 24
1800 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Drury, Jack [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
CAR
  1. Lindgren, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
2.
NYR
  1. Rutta, Jan
  2. Sturm, Nico
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (SJS)
SJS
  1. Kakko, Kaapo
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (NYR)
3.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de CAR
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de NYR
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYR
Logo de MIN
Logo de NYR
2026
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2388 000 000 $87 764 857 $512 500 $532 500 $235 143 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
UFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 437 500 $4 437 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
820 000 $820 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
846 667 $846 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 872 000 $3 872 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $ (Bonis de performance25 000 $$25K)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
24 1st Rd Pick LHD, 24
800 000 $800 000 $
24 2nd Rd Pick C, 24
800 000 $800 000 $
24 2nd Rd Pick RHD, 24
800 000 $800 000 $
24 4th Rd Pick G, 24
800 000 $800 000 $
24 5th Rd Pick RW, 24
800 000 $800 000 $
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Rangers de New York
787 500 $787 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
860 000 $860 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
806 667 $806 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
867 500 $867 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
lun. à 13 h 34
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,707
Mentions "j'aime": 558
Insanely lopsided Kappo trade for NYR. Start off by dropping the 2nd from the trade
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
lun. à 13 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 4,786
Mentions "j'aime": 1,352
Braden Schneider would probably be more interesting than Lindgren... We already have Slavin and Orlov on the left side
lun. à 13 h 37
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 1
I don’t think it’s lopsided at all for San Jose to get a former #2 overall pick they can actually play big minutes and revitalize career for 2 UFAs you won’t get more then a 4th for each come deadline time. SJ has multiple early picks too they can afford this for Kakko.
Quoting: poeticentropy
Insanely lopsided Kappo trade for NYR. Start off by dropping the 2nd from the trade
lun. à 13 h 39
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 1
I think RD you guys will be hitting Free agency. I think Lindgren is a perfect LD for you to keep you balanced and not overpay like you would for Skjei. He fits your style as well. With the state tax you can prob sign Lindy in $4m range long term too.
Quoting: JarvisforSelke
Braden Schneider would probably be more interesting than Lindgren... We already have Slavin and Orlov on the left side
lun. à 13 h 39
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 328
Mentions "j'aime": 276
Columbus declines.
Jacketsman61, BoomerTheHero, Friendly_Cannon and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
lun. à 13 h 40
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 4,786
Mentions "j'aime": 1,352
Quoting: jjvatore11
I think RD you guys will be hitting Free agency. I think Lindgren is a perfect LD for you to keep you balanced and not overpay like you would for Skjei. He fits your style as well. With the state tax you can prob sign Lindy in $4m range long term too.


That's a fair point and he could probably a good partner for Morrow to help him
lun. à 13 h 43
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,707
Mentions "j'aime": 558
Quoting: jjvatore11
I don’t think it’s lopsided at all for San Jose to get a former #2 overall pick they can actually play big minutes and revitalize career for 2 UFAs you won’t get more then a 4th for each come deadline time. SJ has multiple early picks too they can afford this for Kakko.


I mean good spin but he's basically a bust underperforming when surrounded by a top notch NYR talent. He'll more than likely tank hard on a terrible SJ team. He's not worth the risk of dumping the 33rd OA pick.
lun. à 13 h 43
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 1
I can see why they wouldn’t want to give up Dumais.However they are loaded with prospect forwards. You can get Jones who can truly be a Significant peice with ice time that we’ll probably regret. Also Garand will be a potential starter replacement for Elvis which I think entices CBJ. JD also familiar with both if he has any input still w/ Waddell
Quoting: CertifiedAverage
Columbus declines.
lun. à 13 h 53
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 1
As a fan who watches every ranger game the talent is absolutely there but playing 3rd line most of his career here and no PP time it’s easy to see why he won’t produce. Although he is probably most dynamic guy with size with the puck on the whole team. He needs a change of scenery desperately. He is going to be a good 2nd line RW for years to come I believe that.
Quoting: poeticentropy
I mean good spin but he's basically a bust underperforming when surrounded by a top notch NYR talent. He'll more than likely tank hard on a terrible SJ team. He's not worth the risk of dumping the 33rd OA pick.


Quoting: poeticentropy
I mean good spin but he's basically a bust underperforming when surrounded by a top notch NYR talent. He'll more than likely tank hard on a terrible SJ team. He's not worth the risk of dumping the 33rd OA pick.
poeticentropy a aimé ceci.
lun. à 13 h 54
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 328
Mentions "j'aime": 276
Quoting: jjvatore11
I can see why they wouldn’t want to give up Dumais.However they are loaded with prospect forwards. You can get Jones who can truly be a Significant peice with ice time that we’ll probably regret. Also Garand will be a potential starter replacement for Elvis which I think entices CBJ. JD also familiar with both if he has any input still w/ Waddell


Columbus has Greaves and Ivanov in the pipeline who both look pretty solid in the long run, so I don't feel like there is any rush to address the goalie situation if they're just running Merzlikins and Tarasov next year. I don't think personally Dumais will be in Columbus long-term (though he's one of my favourite prospects), but if he's traded, it's probably going to be as part of a quantity-for-quality package, i.e., prospects + more for a high-end player.
Jacketsman61, benjgc et Pijonty a aimé ceci.
lun. à 13 h 57
#11
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,469
Mentions "j'aime": 1,114
Quoting: jjvatore11
I don’t think it’s lopsided at all for San Jose to get a former #2 overall pick they can actually play big minutes and revitalize career for 2 UFAs you won’t get more then a 4th for each come deadline time. SJ has multiple early picks too they can afford this for Kakko.


No one cares where he was drafted. he's been flat out bad at large stretches and hasn't progressed anywhere near where he was anticipated. He's a solid 3rd line scorer and nothing more. That's where his value is

Rutta you can take, but Sturm isn't going for a measly 4th. that 2nd is 33rd overall as well. Pretty much a 1st and that's a hard pass
glarson17 a aimé ceci.
lun. à 14 h 12
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: AStovetop
No one cares where he was drafted. he's been flat out bad at large stretches and hasn't progressed anywhere near where he was anticipated. He's a solid 3rd line scorer and nothing more. That's where his value is

You are a stat watcher my friend…Watch Kakko play and you will think otherwise. Many young forwards were not good early in career think Reinhardt , Marcheassualt Etc

Also what too 2nd round picks are unreal there? Not many…

And don’t overrate Sturm now cmon dude .

This is not far fetched point dexter… sharks have made plenty worse deals just look at Hertl man. SJ won’t have to worry about what they’re giving up for the hope they have a RW for now and future.

Rutta you can take, but Sturm isn't going for a measly 4th. that 2nd is 33rd overall as well. Pretty much a 1st and that's a hard pass
lun. à 15 h 0
#13
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,469
Mentions "j'aime": 1,114
Quoting: jjvatore11


Lmao Point Dexter? You have no idea what you're talking about.

1. Your two examples are the two most notable late bloomers. The MASSIVE majority are the Zadina's of the world and don't pan out. beyond that, at the time Marchy was traded as an INCENTIVE to take Reilly in the expansion. They literally didn't get value back for him. Reinhart already had 4 40+ point seasons including a 50 pt and 60 pt season in the same time frame as Kakko.

2. Players taken in the very late 1st/early 2nd range: Rakell, Jenner, Kempe, Barbashev, Demko, Marcus Pettersson, Aho, Carlo, Cernak, Hintz, Kyrou, DeBrincat, Frost, Romanov, Pinto, Alex Vlasic, Peterka, Faber. That's just looking through very quickly, all of whom I'd take over Kakko

3. It's funny you call me a stat watcher for saying Kakko's not that good and then then say I'm overvaluing Sturm. I guarantee I've seen much more of Kakko than you have Sturm. And I don't blame you, who wants to sit through Sharks games

4. if you think Grier didn't do unbelievable with the Hertl trade then you don't understand the context of that deal. Hertl was injured, 30 years old and had 6 1/2 years left on his deal with a full NMC. Grier was able to not just move him and over 80% of that contracts cap hit, but get back a very good 2-way Center prospect and an unprotected 1st.

5. They have Zetterlund on the Right side for now and the future. Coming as soon as next year they have, Gushchin, Smith, Musty can play the right side, possible 14th overall this year, Hulttunen. They'll be more than fine without Kakko
lun. à 15 h 42
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 1
You are a stupid idiot for real if you’d rather keep Sturm & Rutta & a 2’d when you have another 2nd that for a chance at Kakko.

Tough sell tryna tell me Kakko is Zadina you clearly don’t watch hockey you fool



Quoting: AStovetop
Quoting: jjvatore11


Lmao Point Dexter? You have no idea what you're talking about.

1. Your two examples are the two most notable late bloomers. The MASSIVE majority are the Zadina's of the world and don't pan out. beyond that, at the time Marchy was traded as an INCENTIVE to take Reilly in the expansion. They literally didn't get value back for him. Reinhart already had 4 40+ point seasons including a 50 pt and 60 pt season in the same time frame as Kakko.

2. Players taken in the very late 1st/early 2nd range: Rakell, Jenner, Kempe, Barbashev, Demko, Marcus Pettersson, Aho, Carlo, Cernak, Hintz, Kyrou, DeBrincat, Frost, Romanov, Pinto, Alex Vlasic, Peterka, Faber. That's just looking through very quickly, all of whom I'd take over Kakko

3. It's funny you call me a stat watcher for saying Kakko's not that good and then then say I'm overvaluing Sturm. I guarantee I've seen much more of Kakko than you have Sturm. And I don't blame you, who wants to sit through Sharks games

4. if you think Grier didn't do unbelievable with the Hertl trade then you don't understand the context of that deal. Hertl was injured, 30 years old and had 6 1/2 years left on his deal with a full NMC. Grier was able to not just move him and over 80% of that contracts cap hit, but get back a very good 2-way Center prospect and an unprotected 1st.

5. They have Zetterlund on the Right side for now and the future. Coming as soon as next year they have, Gushchin, Smith, Musty can play the right side, possible 14th overall this year, Hulttunen. They'll be more than fine without Kakko
lun. à 16 h 32
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,705
Mentions "j'aime": 3,950
Nobody cares where Kakko was drafted, he’s a bust for what he was talked up to be. He’s a third liner. Never scored at a .50 point per game pace. Not that great defensively either to make up for the lack of offense or consistency. 33 overall for him alone is an overpay, let alone add in quality depth pieces.

Stop being a homer
lun. à 16 h 37
#16
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,469
Mentions "j'aime": 1,114
Quoting: jjvatore11
You are a stupid idiot for real if you’d rather keep Sturm & Rutta & a 2’d when you have another 2nd that for a chance at Kakko.

Tough sell tryna tell me Kakko is Zadina you clearly don’t watch hockey you fool





Lmao Point Dexter? You have no idea what you're talking about.

1. Your two examples are the two most notable late bloomers. The MASSIVE majority are the Zadina's of the world and don't pan out. beyond that, at the time Marchy was traded as an INCENTIVE to take Reilly in the expansion. They literally didn't get value back for him. Reinhart already had 4 40+ point seasons including a 50 pt and 60 pt season in the same time frame as Kakko.

2. Players taken in the very late 1st/early 2nd range: Rakell, Jenner, Kempe, Barbashev, Demko, Marcus Pettersson, Aho, Carlo, Cernak, Hintz, Kyrou, DeBrincat, Frost, Romanov, Pinto, Alex Vlasic, Peterka, Faber. That's just looking through very quickly, all of whom I'd take over Kakko

3. It's funny you call me a stat watcher for saying Kakko's not that good and then then say I'm overvaluing Sturm. I guarantee I've seen much more of Kakko than you have Sturm. And I don't blame you, who wants to sit through Sharks games

4. if you think Grier didn't do unbelievable with the Hertl trade then you don't understand the context of that deal. Hertl was injured, 30 years old and had 6 1/2 years left on his deal with a full NMC. Grier was able to not just move him and over 80% of that contracts cap hit, but get back a very good 2-way Center prospect and an unprotected 1st.

5. They have Zetterlund on the Right side for now and the future. Coming as soon as next year they have, Gushchin, Smith, Musty can play the right side, possible 14th overall this year, Hulttunen. They'll be more than fine without Kakko


I backed up everything I said with points. You're just calling me a stupd idiot lmao. Are you 6 years old? if you can't make a hockey point then stfu
lun. à 16 h 40
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 1
You are an idiot.

Quoting: AStovetop
I backed up everything I said with points. You're just calling me a stupd idiot lmao. Are you 6 years old? if you can't make a hockey point then stfu
lun. à 16 h 42
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2024
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Bro Kakko has some of the best defensive metrics as a forward in the playoffs this year and regular season. Don’t blurt out dumb **** yaaaa reeeetaaaard


Quoting: glarson17
Nobody cares where Kakko was drafted, he’s a bust for what he was talked up to be. He’s a third liner. Never scored at a .50 point per game pace. Not that great defensively either to make up for the lack of offense or consistency. 33 overall for him alone is an overpay, let alone add in quality depth pieces.

Stop being a homer


Quoting: glarson17
Nobody cares where Kakko was drafted, he’s a bust for what he was talked up to be. He’s a third liner. Never scored at a .50 point per game pace. Not that great defensively either to make up for the lack of offense or consistency. 33 overall for him alone is an overpay, let alone add in quality depth pieces.

Stop being a homer


Quoting: glarson17
Nobody cares where Kakko was drafted, he’s a bust for what he was talked up to be. He’s a third liner. Never scored at a .50 point per game pace. Not that great defensively either to make up for the lack of offense or consistency. 33 overall for him alone is an overpay, let alone add in quality depth pieces.

Stop being a homer
lun. à 17 h 0
#19
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,469
Mentions "j'aime": 1,114
Quoting: jjvatore11
You are an idiot.


Keep crying lol
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage