SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canes - 2425

Créé par: ChelPenguins
Équipe: 2024-25 Hurricanes de la Caroline
Date de création initiale: 23 juin 2024
Publié: 23 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 220 768 $
77 725 500 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 144 444 $
34 257 577 $
33 775 200 $
Transactions
1.
CAR
  1. Ullmark, Linus
Détails additionnels:
Linus Ullmark signs 5 x 7,000,000 extension
BOS
  1. Necas, Martin [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Martin Necas signs 7 x 7,521,066 extension
2.
CAR
    Future considerations
    CGY
    1. Andersen, Frederik
    2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
    3.
    CAR
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
    CHI
      Jake Guentzel's UFA rights

      Immediately signs to a 7 x 9,310,400 million dollar contract
      4.
      WPG
      1. Martin, Spencer
      2. Suzuki, Ryan
      3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
      4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2024
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de CAR
      2025
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de CAR
      2026
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de CAR
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2088 000 000 $87 795 989 $0 $350 000 $204 011 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      7 725 500 $7 725 500 $
      AD
      RFA
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      4 257 577 $4 257 577 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
      C, AG
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      AD, AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      2 144 444 $2 144 444 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      2 220 768 $2 220 768 $
      C
      RFA
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      905 833 $905 833 $
      AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      4 820 000 $4 820 000 $
      C
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
      AD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
      DG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      DD
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
      DD
      RFA - 2
      3 775 200 $3 775 200 $
      DD
      UFA - 3

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      23 juin à 18 h 1
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2022
      Messages: 4,392
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,554
      Jets obviously decline pulock for ehlers is a way better trade that the jets could pursue
      ChelPenguins a aimé ceci.
      23 juin à 18 h 4
      #2
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 39,919
      Mentions "j'aime": 20,531
      Quoting: Howie
      Jets obviously decline pulock for ehlers is a way better trade that the jets could pursue


      You aren't getting 7 years of Pulock for 1 year of Ehlers. That's not at all realistic
      23 juin à 18 h 4
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2022
      Messages: 4,392
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,554
      Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
      You aren't getting 7 years of Pulock for 1 year of Ehlers. That's not at all realistic


      Ehlers would come with an extension obviously doesn't need to be a draft trade but a July 1st trade
      23 juin à 18 h 5
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 19,510
      Mentions "j'aime": 10,161
      UFA rights aren't worth a very early 3rd round pick (almost late 2nd)
      Bedsy_Burner a aimé ceci.
      23 juin à 18 h 6
      #5
      Bcarlo25
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2018
      Messages: 22,895
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,465
      this team isn't cap complaint.

      Quoting: Howie
      Ehlers would come with an extension obviously doesn't need to be a draft trade but a July 1st trade


      that doesnt impact trade value much.
      23 juin à 18 h 6
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 39,919
      Mentions "j'aime": 20,531
      Quoting: Howie
      Ehlers would come with an extension obviously doesn't need to be a draft trade but a July 1st trade


      An extension is negotiated by the acquiring team after a trade is made, it has no direct effect on trade value.
      23 juin à 18 h 7
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2022
      Messages: 4,392
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,554
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      UFA rights aren't worth a very early 3rd round pick (almost late 2nd)


      Yeah Chicago can probably trade a 4th-5th depending on the year
      Bedsy_Burner a aimé ceci.
      23 juin à 18 h 8
      #8
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2022
      Messages: 4,392
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,554
      Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
      An extension is negotiated by the acquiring team after a trade is made, it has no direct effect on trade value.


      Yeah and lou has done it in the past for horvat definitely not an issue as he'll get more playing time
      23 juin à 18 h 10
      #9
      Sign chatty or riot
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2024
      Messages: 50
      Mentions "j'aime": 4
      Dont think any of those trades would happen, but I like your thought process. I really like ehlers and carrier. I also like the idea of a goalie upgrade. Only other change would probably be to trade/buyout KK or Kuzy to get a legit 2c like Stephenson or Monahan.
      ChelPenguins a aimé ceci.
      23 juin à 18 h 11
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 39,919
      Mentions "j'aime": 20,531
      Quoting: Howie
      Yeah and lou has done it in the past for horvat definitely not an issue as he'll get more playing time


      He traded a core player locked up long term for Horvat? Did I miss something in the trade conditions?
      23 juin à 18 h 12
      #11
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2020
      Messages: 9,939
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,097
      Canes don’t do these trades. Ullmark isn’t it for necas.

      Ehlers will get an 8 x 8.5+ extension, we aren’t doing that without playing first. No chance we give that much for a guy we are renting

      0 reason to dump Freddie
      23 juin à 18 h 13
      #12
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2022
      Messages: 4,392
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,554
      Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
      He traded a core player locked up long term for Horvat? Did I miss something in the trade conditions?


      He traded for a player he wanted and extended him not impossible to trade for ehlers for pulock to change up the team. Rather trade ehlers to a team that will give him the first line time he deserves which you don't have here.
      23 juin à 18 h 15
      #13
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2017
      Messages: 20,245
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,042
      Modifié 23 juin à 18 h 31
      Much as I would like that to happen.

      1- it would not be 1 for 1

      2 - Canes have a pair of more than capable goalies with a combined cap hit of 5.4. PK is set to take over the #1 at some point, if not this year, next.

      3 - Canes have way too many other holes to fill and cap constraints that moving Necas for an uneeded goalie makes little sense, they need to get a replacement for him in the trade if anything.
      Canesfan21_ a aimé ceci.
      23 juin à 18 h 15
      #14
      Colby
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2024
      Messages: 692
      Mentions "j'aime": 163
      not sure if u canes fans are suddenly viewing ullmark as a savoir or if necas is worthless to u guys? had canes fans tell me like 3 weeks ago lysell + 2nd/1st + ullmark for necas isnt good enough.
      tera is gonna get more then that for sure. someone is going to offer him 5m(probably the bruins if Jake DB leaves if they get necas). Freddy should get u guys at least a late second. so many teams looking for a 1B goalie that he should have plenty of people calling for him.
      23 juin à 18 h 18
      #15
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 39,919
      Mentions "j'aime": 20,531
      Quoting: Howie
      He traded for a player he wanted and extended him not impossible to trade for ehlers for pulock to change up the team. Rather trade ehlers to a team that will give him the first line time he deserves which you don't have here.


      He did trade for a player he wanted, that's not uncommon. What is very uncommon is trading a core player with term for a rental
      23 juin à 18 h 20
      #16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2021
      Messages: 5,084
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,665
      Canes aren’t going to spend their best trade asset on a goalie. This year is all about seeing if Kochetkov is the guy.

      Winnipeg doesn’t take that for Ehlers, two AHLers and some late in the round picks aren’t what they need. The canes also wouldn’t extend him

      Andersen has positive value, no reason to give up a pick to dump him even if we upgrade in his spot
      23 juin à 18 h 21
      #17
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2022
      Messages: 4,392
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,554
      Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
      He did trade for a player he wanted, that's not uncommon. What is very uncommon is trading a core player with term for a rental


      Not a rental he can extend him 7x7 minutes after the trade and boom problem solved. Wow that was easy.
      23 juin à 18 h 33
      #18
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 39,919
      Mentions "j'aime": 20,531
      Quoting: Howie
      Not a rental he can extend him 7x7 minutes after the trade and boom problem solved. Wow that was easy.


      He can extend him for 8 years at any cap hit after the trade is made, that does not change the fact that he is acquiring a player with 1 year of term left. How is this confusing to you?

      Maybe I'll try a different way of explaining this. If I am getting new tires for my car but I am capable of installing them myself I am not going to pay the seller the installation fee if I am the one putting them on my car
      23 juin à 18 h 39
      #19
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 7,607
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,676
      canes reject first two, other teams reject other two.

      Ullmark not worth Necas and no need to sign him to long term extension. Koochie gets his shot this year.

      Freddy isn’t a cap dump and see point 1 above. If they were trying to move him flames don’t make sense

      Why are hawks trading for Guentzel rights and not trying to get an 8 year deal done? They’re not sending a third for that, they can just try to sign him on 7/1.

      Not enough quality for jets to accept. Also ehlers doesn’t make a ton of sense for canes. If they’re not willing to extend Guentzel they won’t be willing to extend Ehlers long term which is what he’ll look for next summer.
      23 juin à 23 h 12
      #20
      Démarrer sujet
      ChelPenguins
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2022
      Messages: 41
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Quoting: Chatfield4MVP
      Dont think any of those trades would happen, but I like your thought process. I really like ehlers and carrier. I also like the idea of a goalie upgrade. Only other change would probably be to trade/buyout KK or Kuzy to get a legit 2c like Stephenson or Monahan.


      Yep. Center depth looks pretty weak. I would definitely try and at least see what the buyout would cost on kk
      23 juin à 23 h 17
      #21
      Démarrer sujet
      ChelPenguins
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2022
      Messages: 41
      Mentions "j'aime": 3
      Quoting: vikhodush
      canes reject first two, other teams reject other two.

      Ullmark not worth Necas and no need to sign him to long term extension. Koochie gets his shot this year.

      Freddy isn’t a cap dump and see point 1 above. If they were trying to move him flames don’t make sense

      Why are hawks trading for Guentzel rights and not trying to get an 8 year deal done? They’re not sending a third for that, they can just try to sign him on 7/1.

      Not enough quality for jets to accept. Also ehlers doesn’t make a ton of sense for canes. If they’re not willing to extend Guentzel they won’t be willing to extend Ehlers long term which is what he’ll look for next summer.


      - Canes need a goalie. End of discussion. Ullmark & Kuchi could potentially be a nice tandem for years to come.
      - Freddy hasn't worked out, it's time to move on. Flames should at least call on him as he would serve as a nice role model for the rookie wolf in net for at least 1 year.
      - Canes have reportedly shopped Jake's rights for a mid-round pick so I based it off that.
      - Ehlers trade is a long shot, won't happen but thought I'd have some fun.
      -
      23 juin à 23 h 38
      #22
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2020
      Messages: 17,698
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,733
      There's no incentive for Winnipeg to trade Ehlers for a late first and a bunch of nothing.
      24 juin à 0 h 12
      #23
      Sign chatty or riot
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2024
      Messages: 50
      Mentions "j'aime": 4
      Quoting: Windjammer
      There's no incentive for Winnipeg to trade Ehlers for a late first and a bunch of nothing.


      bro if you love the jets so much why don't you marry them
      24 juin à 0 h 47
      #24
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 7,607
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,676
      Quoting: ChelPenguins
      - Canes need a goalie. End of discussion. Ullmark & Kuchi could potentially be a nice tandem for years to come.
      - Freddy hasn't worked out, it's time to move on. Flames should at least call on him as he would serve as a nice role model for the rookie wolf in net for at least 1 year.
      - Canes have reportedly shopped Jake's rights for a mid-round pick so I based it off that.
      - Ehlers trade is a long shot, won't happen but thought I'd have some fun.
      -


      Trading Necas for Ullmark is awful. Just awful. Won’t be happening. Kooch is the guy this year. Need to know if he can handle it.

      I’d suggest you worry about pens goaltending.
      24 juin à 2 h 51
      #25
      First round bust
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2023
      Messages: 1,107
      Mentions "j'aime": 485
      Toronto would probably be a good landing spot for Andersen. That said, at that price the Flames can always take him and either flip him or Vladar.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage