SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

You are in over your head if you expect both Chychrun and 25 for Ullmark

Créé par: sensonfire
Équipe: 2024-25 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 23 juin 2024
Publié: 23 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
24 000 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
1775 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
24 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Dickinson, Sam
3950 000 $
Mews, Henry
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Ullmark, Linus
Détails additionnels:
Something tells me that Ottawa is the only team that currently has a serious offer on the table for Ullmark.


Boston is just holding out for as long as they can until they ultimately decide to accept it.


Also, Ullmark has a 1 million dollar signing bonus due on July 1st.


And I'm not sure having a Number 1 goalie with a 5 million dollar cap hit idle on the team bench for half a season before he disappears as a UFA is the most ideal situation for Boston.
BOS
  1. Forsberg, Anton
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
You will be getting one or the other.


More likely than not, it will be 25 instead of Chychrun.
2.
OTT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
Stanley Cup Victory tomorrow night
3.
OTT
  1. Sawchyn, Gracyn [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (FLA)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Chychrun, Jakob (2 300 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
8 year extension for Chychrun the next day.
4.
OTT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (OTT)
UTA
  1. Brännström, Erik [Droits de RFA]
5.
OTT
    Forfeited
    VGK
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (OTT)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de DET
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de OTT
    2025
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    2026
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2288 000 000 $86 950 714 $850 000 $600 000 $1 049 286 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
    AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
    C
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AD, C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
    C
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    863 333 $863 333 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    835 000 $835 000 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG
    UFA
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    8 050 000 $8 050 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    805 000 $805 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    23 juin à 12 h 12
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 570
    Mentions "j'aime": 191
    Yeah the way I see it 25oal straight up for Ullmark makes sense
    Bruins1054_gmb a aimé ceci.
    23 juin à 12 h 17
    #2
    DiscouragedBruinsFan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 1,303
    Mentions "j'aime": 516
    The 1st rd pick is fine but you're going to have to pay to move your cap dump.
    KennyBoi, CW_73, Quaider11 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
    23 juin à 12 h 25
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2021
    Messages: 37
    Mentions "j'aime": 15
    The BOS trade makes sense. If I’m BOS, I want the pick. Forsberg was good against Bos late in the season. I think their goalie coach could make him better if they keep him.
    sensonfire a aimé ceci.
    23 juin à 12 h 47
    #4
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2023
    Messages: 4,685
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,500
    You’re over simplifying the situation. Chychrun is departing too, so SENs are motivated to move him just as much as Bruins are to move Ullmark.
    Ullmark has a 15 team NTC, and I’d be willing to bet Ottawa is on it. So he’d have to agree to deal, no guarantees. And if he agreed, he’d probably want an extension worked out - how do you know SENs are willing to meet his asking price?
    Finally, trade is in division - & clearly Ottawa is more motivated - Bruins should & will drive a hard bargain
    23 juin à 12 h 50
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 278
    Mentions "j'aime": 109
    If you're right, and I'm not questioning that you are, Bruins still don't take on Forsberg for free.
    Quaider11 et BruisedHyman a aimé ceci.
    23 juin à 13 h 30
    #6
    Au-revoir Dorion
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 5,075
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,324
    Quoting: MitchJr
    You’re over simplifying the situation. Chychrun is departing too, so SENs are motivated to move him just as much as Bruins are to move Ullmark.
    Ullmark has a 15 team NTC, and I’d be willing to bet Ottawa is on it. So he’d have to agree to deal, no guarantees. And if he agreed, he’d probably want an extension worked out - how do you know SENs are willing to meet his asking price?
    Finally, trade is in division - & clearly Ottawa is more motivated - Bruins should & will drive a hard bargain


    but the bruins should also be incentivized to do this so they don’t potentially lose ullmark for nothing next year. I think both sides have some good leverage and they’ll bang out a fair deal
    sensonfire et SJSF a aimé ceci.
    23 juin à 13 h 34
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2023
    Messages: 602
    Mentions "j'aime": 367
    Sweeney has stated that they aren't opposed to running back the tandem. It was already the strength of the team, but they played last season with a 5 million dollar cap penalty, which is essentially Ullmarks contract. Looking at it from that perspective, they should be able to be as good this season as last, with the 15 million in remaining cap after Swayman signs. Definitely not ideal, but holding out for what you want is a move I appreciate the front office trying to do in this situation. If the current return is a late first or 2 years of Chychrun, then don't move Ullmark and get the 5 million back July 1st, 2025.

    Of course it will get some backlash as they're currently 29th in prospect pools league-wide, but is one late first going to change that? Unless the next Pastrnak or McAvoy falls to them that far (in a draft where the ledge of top end talent ends around 12-13) I'm not so sure.
    23 juin à 13 h 58
    #8
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 7,642
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,102
    i think its 25th going to BOS, chych has more value than ullmark and OTT seems to be trading a D to PHI in that rumor trade framework, it could either be Chabot or chych in that (Branny also a posibility).

    also that dont get FLA chych.
    23 juin à 14 h 48
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 5,595
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,885
    If Forsberg is included with no retention, that’s the equivalent of $1.6M of wasted cap when we bury him and probably 1.925M over what he’d sign as a FA. Every time you include him, please realize that’s worth a late second round pick (53 to 57) to dump his salary according to puckpedia. I realize Ottawa fans might view him as full of potential, but he’s basically a minimum caliber goaltender at best. I’d rather sign Driedger.

    Also, Ottawa is giving Boston something on top of that late first in this draft. It could be a Klevin, Boucher, or Jarventie on top of the first, but it is going to be a good (not great) prospect.
    23 juin à 14 h 56
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    sensonfire
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 12,492
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,820
    Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
    The 1st rd pick is fine but you're going to have to pay to move your cap dump.


    Quoting: CW_73
    If you're right, and I'm not questioning that you are, Bruins still don't take on Forsberg for free.


    Quoting: Celtics21
    If Forsberg is included with no retention, that’s the equivalent of $1.6M of wasted cap when we bury him and probably 1.925M over what he’d sign as a FA. Every time you include him, please realize that’s worth a late second round pick (53 to 57) to dump his salary according to puckpedia. I realize Ottawa fans might view him as full of potential, but he’s basically a minimum caliber goaltender at best. I’d rather sign Driedger.

    Also, Ottawa is giving Boston something on top of that late first in this draft. It could be a Klevin, Boucher, or Jarventie on top of the first, but it is going to be a good (not great) prospect.


    If Boston won't take Forsberg, then Boston retains on Ullmark.
    23 juin à 15 h 18
    #11
    DiscouragedBruinsFan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 1,303
    Mentions "j'aime": 516
    Quoting: sensonfire
    If Boston won't take Forsberg, then Boston retains on Ullmark.


    Not for only a late 1st rd pick.
    CW_73 a aimé ceci.
    23 juin à 15 h 20
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 5,595
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,885
    Quoting: sensonfire
    If Boston won't take Forsberg, then Boston retains on Ullmark.


    More likely that Ottawa gives up both 25th and Chychrun with Forsberg than that happening.
    CW_73 a aimé ceci.
    23 juin à 16 h 32
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 278
    Mentions "j'aime": 109
    Quoting: sensonfire
    If Boston won't take Forsberg, then Boston retains on Ullmark.


    For either of those things, Sens have to add on top of the 1st. The first is fair value for Ullmark as is, but it doesn't cover the extra salary considerations
    23 juin à 16 h 42
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 5,595
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,885
    Quoting: CW_73
    For either of those things, Sens have to add on top of the 1st. The first is fair value for Ullmark as is, but it doesn't cover the extra salary considerations


    Don’t see the 25th pick in this draft as fair value for Ullmark. At minimum, Ottawa would be adding a prospect or maybe a conditional 3rd that gets upgraded to a 2nd next year if Ottawa makes the playoffs.
    23 juin à 17 h 9
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 278
    Mentions "j'aime": 109
    Quoting: Celtics21
    Don’t see the 25th pick in this draft as fair value for Ullmark. At minimum, Ottawa would be adding a prospect or maybe a conditional 3rd that gets upgraded to a 2nd next year if Ottawa makes the playoffs.


    It's in line with what goalies tend to go for. Easy to see all the rumors of 1st + Chychrun and want more, but even if it does happen I think it will be broadly agreed that the trade was an overpay. As to Ullmark's "fair" value in particular as a recent Vezina winner being that + a 3rd/Ostapchuk or something...I could be convinced of that.
    23 juin à 17 h 12
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2023
    Messages: 5,595
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,885
    Modifié 23 juin à 17 h 20
    Quoting: CW_73
    It's in line with what goalies tend to go for. Easy to see all the rumors of 1st + Chychrun and want more, but even if it does happen I think it will be broadly agreed that the trade was an overpay. As to Ullmark's "fair" value in particular as a recent Vezina winner being that + a 3rd/Ostapchuk or something...I could be convinced of that.


    I struggle with goaltender values in general, because most of them have cap reasons driven behind them.

    Jersey just acquired an inferior, older goaltender with a more restrictive trade list for a defenseman probably worth a late 2nd and a top 10 protected pick in 2025 from a team that finished in the top 10. People want to assume that last year was the outlier year for Jersey, Are we sure?

    The 25th pick in this draft is past the stage where you are looking at it as good standalone asset. Any pick past 18 fits that description.

    Part of me is more inclined to take a package centered around Chychrun because of where the Boston pick is. That said, freedom to spend that money on a forward has some appeal
    CW_73 a aimé ceci.
    24 juin à 20 h 24
    #17
    Démarrer sujet
    sensonfire
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 12,492
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,820
    Quoting: Quaider11
    Yeah the way I see it 25oal straight up for Ullmark makes sense


    Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
    The 1st rd pick is fine but you're going to have to pay to move your cap dump.


    Quoting: Tele21
    The BOS trade makes sense. If I’m BOS, I want the pick. Forsberg was good against Bos late in the season. I think their goalie coach could make him better if they keep him.


    Quoting: MitchJr
    You’re over simplifying the situation. Chychrun is departing too, so SENs are motivated to move him just as much as Bruins are to move Ullmark.
    Ullmark has a 15 team NTC, and I’d be willing to bet Ottawa is on it. So he’d have to agree to deal, no guarantees. And if he agreed, he’d probably want an extension worked out - how do you know SENs are willing to meet his asking price?
    Finally, trade is in division - & clearly Ottawa is more motivated - Bruins should & will drive a hard bargain


    Quoting: CW_73
    If you're right, and I'm not questioning that you are, Bruins still don't take on Forsberg for free.


    Quoting: Borocop
    but the bruins should also be incentivized to do this so they don’t potentially lose ullmark for nothing next year. I think both sides have some good leverage and they’ll bang out a fair deal


    Quoting: SJSF
    Sweeney has stated that they aren't opposed to running back the tandem. It was already the strength of the team, but they played last season with a 5 million dollar cap penalty, which is essentially Ullmarks contract. Looking at it from that perspective, they should be able to be as good this season as last, with the 15 million in remaining cap after Swayman signs. Definitely not ideal, but holding out for what you want is a move I appreciate the front office trying to do in this situation. If the current return is a late first or 2 years of Chychrun, then don't move Ullmark and get the 5 million back July 1st, 2025.

    Of course it will get some backlash as they're currently 29th in prospect pools league-wide, but is one late first going to change that? Unless the next Pastrnak or McAvoy falls to them that far (in a draft where the ledge of top end talent ends around 12-13) I'm not so sure.


    Quoting: athrin
    i think its 25th going to BOS, chych has more value than ullmark and OTT seems to be trading a D to PHI in that rumor trade framework, it could either be Chabot or chych in that (Branny also a posibility).

    also that dont get FLA chych.


    Quoting: Celtics21
    If Forsberg is included with no retention, that’s the equivalent of $1.6M of wasted cap when we bury him and probably 1.925M over what he’d sign as a FA. Every time you include him, please realize that’s worth a late second round pick (53 to 57) to dump his salary according to puckpedia. I realize Ottawa fans might view him as full of potential, but he’s basically a minimum caliber goaltender at best. I’d rather sign Driedger.

    Also, Ottawa is giving Boston something on top of that late first in this draft. It could be a Klevin, Boucher, or Jarventie on top of the first, but it is going to be a good (not great) prospect.


    Quoting: Bruins1054_gmb
    Not for only a late 1st rd pick.


    Quoting: Celtics21
    More likely that Ottawa gives up both 25th and Chychrun with Forsberg than that happening.


    Quoting: CW_73
    For either of those things, Sens have to add on top of the 1st. The first is fair value for Ullmark as is, but it doesn't cover the extra salary considerations


    Quoting: Celtics21
    Don’t see the 25th pick in this draft as fair value for Ullmark. At minimum, Ottawa would be adding a prospect or maybe a conditional 3rd that gets upgraded to a 2nd next year if Ottawa makes the playoffs.


    Quoting: CW_73
    It's in line with what goalies tend to go for. Easy to see all the rumors of 1st + Chychrun and want more, but even if it does happen I think it will be broadly agreed that the trade was an overpay. As to Ullmark's "fair" value in particular as a recent Vezina winner being that + a 3rd/Ostapchuk or something...I could be convinced of that.


    Quoting: Celtics21
    I struggle with goaltender values in general, because most of them have cap reasons driven behind them.

    Jersey just acquired an inferior, older goaltender with a more restrictive trade list for a defenseman probably worth a late 2nd and a top 10 protected pick in 2025 from a team that finished in the top 10. People want to assume that last year was the outlier year for Jersey, Are we sure?

    The 25th pick in this draft is past the stage where you are looking at it as good standalone asset. Any pick past 18 fits that description.

    Part of me is more inclined to take a package centered around Chychrun because of where the Boston pick is. That said, freedom to spend that money on a forward has some appeal


    https://www.nhl.com/bruins/news/bruins-acquire-mark-kastelic-joonas-korpisalo-and-2024-first-round-draft-pick-from-ottawa-senators-in-exchange-for-linus-ullmark
    Bruins1054_gmb et TheBoyDuddus a aimé ceci.
    24 juin à 20 h 53
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2023
    Messages: 602
    Mentions "j'aime": 367
    Quoting: sensonfire
    https://www.nhl.com/bruins/news/bruins-acquire-mark-kastelic-joonas-korpisalo-and-2024-first-round-draft-pick-from-ottawa-senators-in-exchange-for-linus-ullmark


    Woof, Sweeney fooled me. Now I really wish they would've just kept Ullmark
    24 juin à 21 h 6
    #19
    DiscouragedBruinsFan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 1,303
    Mentions "j'aime": 516
    Quoting: sensonfire
    https://www.nhl.com/bruins/news/bruins-acquire-mark-kastelic-joonas-korpisalo-and-2024-first-round-draft-pick-from-ottawa-senators-in-exchange-for-linus-ullmark


    Brutal.
    sensonfire, TheBoyDuddus et SJSF a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage