SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Laine I think this could be a good fit

Créé par: PuckProspective
Équipe: 2024-25 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 12 juin 2024
Publié: 12 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
79 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
CHI
  1. Laine, Patrik
Détails additionnels:
Not sure what the return would be, but I think Laine playing alongside bedsy would be a good fit
CBJ
  1. Ludwinski, Paul
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2088 000 000 $75 615 833 $0 $6 307 500 $12 384 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance900 000 $$900K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 juin à 18 h 40
#1
Snowhawk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 3,103
Mentions "j'aime": 4,737
Hawks decline.

While I hope nothing but the best for Laine as he works he way through whatever off ice issues he is dealing with, it doesn’t make sense for any team never mind one going through a rebuild to trade prospects and draft capital for him. I would need assurances that he has a handle on his life before even considering bringing him into the organization.
PuckProspective, Hawksguy81 et RicXX a aimé ceci.
12 juin à 18 h 41
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 1,767
Mentions "j'aime": 945
The answer to your ponderings is, "More than this." Columbus is likely to retain at least some money, which in this case would demand one of Moore or Rinzel as part of the return.
12 juin à 18 h 51
#3
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 10,167
Mentions "j'aime": 6,321
The max I would give is a 2nd if that’s not in the ballpark then that’s okay too.
Hawksguy81, RicXX et Snowhawk18 a aimé ceci.
12 juin à 18 h 54
#4
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,592
Mentions "j'aime": 5,041
Quoting: benjgc
The answer to your ponderings is, "More than this." Columbus is likely to retain at least some money, which in this case would demand one of Moore or Rinzel as part of the return.


Chicago doesn’t need retention, nor are they moving prospects. It’s a bad fit.
benjgc, dopplsan, Hawksguy81 and 3 others a aimé ceci.
12 juin à 20 h 15
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 164
Mentions "j'aime": 81
Quoting: benjgc
The answer to your ponderings is, "More than this." Columbus is likely to retain at least some money, which in this case would demand one of Moore or Rinzel as part of the return.


No team is giving up a top prospect for a guy who can’t stay healthy, has some questionable off ice problems, and is very publicly looking to be moved, even with retention. Especially the hawks who don’t need retention and definitely won’t be giving away good prospects. I could see the hawks being a fit for a second round pick plus a little more but anything beyond that and the hawks say no, probably every team does
RicXX et Snowhawk18 a aimé ceci.
12 juin à 20 h 15
#6
Blackhawks Faithful
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 767
Mentions "j'aime": 565
Quoting: benjgc
The answer to your ponderings is, "More than this." Columbus is likely to retain at least some money, which in this case would demand one of Moore or Rinzel as part of the return.


You want one of those prospects, CBJ is giving Laine and at least a 1st.
12 juin à 23 h 14
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,665
Mentions "j'aime": 2,424
Quoting: Snowhawk18
Hawks decline.

While I hope nothing but the best for Laine as he works he way through whatever off ice issues he is dealing with, it doesn’t make sense for any team never mind one going through a rebuild to trade prospects and draft capital for him. I would need assurances that he has a handle on his life before even considering bringing him into the organization.


I agree for Chicago it makes no sense. For what it's worth, it appears his off-ice issues are 100% mental health, which can be largely attributed to (we assume) the unexpected loss of his father in the fall.

His injuries that kept him out last season were the result of a dirty headshot and a dirty can opener/slewfoot. I think a contending team would pay assets for a 26-year-old former 40-goal-scorer who's still nearly scoring at a ppg in the past 3 seasons at (likely) ~$6-7M after retention.
benjgc et Snowhawk18 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage