SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

24-25 Blackhawks v4

Créé par: cagauf
Équipe: 2024-25 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 31 mai 2024
Publié: 31 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The goal of this version is a realistic off-season if the Blackhawks draft Ivan Demidov.

What I believe to be the main priorities of the off-season:
1. Acquire one or two veteran wingers that can play in the top 9 (ideally top 6)
2. Acquire a second line right shot defenceman to play with korchinski and to take the pressure off of Connor Murphy
3. Acquire some more organizational depth on defence
4. Pick up one or two bad contracts for assets
5. Move up in the draft to in order to obtain higher quality prospects over sheer quantity as the hawks have had lots of picks and cannot draft 10+ players every year

In this example, hawks take demidov at 2 and move up to 15 swapping with Detroit.
With the 15th pick I see them taking either Jiricek or Brandsegg-Nygård
Let me know what you think of this list and you see anything differently!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
1800 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
1850 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
1825 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
27 500 000 $
25 000 000 $
34 250 000 $
1850 000 $
1850 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Mikheyev, Ilya
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
VAN
    Future Considerations
    2.
    CHI
    1. Ceci, Cody
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
    EDM
    1. Raddysh, Taylor [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
    3.
    CHI
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (DET)
    DET
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
    Détails additionnels:
    UFA signing rights to Tyler Johnson

    I could see Johnson landing here on a cheap contract with his former GM.
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de DET
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CHI
    2025
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2026
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2387 700 000 $80 964 167 $0 $6 675 000 $6 735 833 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
    C
    RFA - 2
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AG
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance900 000 $$900K)
    AD, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 037 500 $4 037 500 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    962 500 $962 500 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    DG
    RFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    31 mai à 13 h 13
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 27
    Mentions "j'aime": 19
    So the incentive for the wings to trade down isn’t shedding salary but to get the rights to a 4th line center?

    Pass
    aedoran et Bedsy_Burner a aimé ceci.
    31 mai à 13 h 15
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 116
    Mentions "j'aime": 141
    Quoting: CD23tol
    So the incentive for the wings to trade down isn’t shedding salary but to get the rights to a 4th line center?

    Pass


    That’s just a minor throw in they are also getting a second round pick to move down three spots.

    What salaries would Detroit want to shed? I’m sure the hawks would be willing to take it on.
    31 mai à 13 h 16
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 27
    Mentions "j'aime": 19
    Quoting: cagauf
    That’s just a minor throw in they are also getting a second round pick to move down three spots.


    Only reason for the wings to move that pick is for a top 6 forward or if someone wants Holl/Copp contract

    No reason to move down if that’s not the case
    aedoran a aimé ceci.
    31 mai à 13 h 17
    #4
    Droakner
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2023
    Messages: 283
    Mentions "j'aime": 109
    Oilers will probably accept that tbh, both sides receiving something they need in a way
    cagauf a aimé ceci.
    31 mai à 13 h 18
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2023
    Messages: 2,722
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,429
    Stephenson will sign for more term and more money, especially if you expect him to sign with CHI. Marchessault likely commands more term as well, but that Stephenson contract is particularly bad.
    31 mai à 13 h 19
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 116
    Mentions "j'aime": 141
    Quoting: CD23tol
    Only reason for the wings to move that pick is for a top 6 forward or if someone wants Holl/Copp contract

    No reason to move down if that’s not the case


    No team would give a top 6 forward to move up 3 spots in the middle of the first round. I’m sure the hawks would be open to taking Holl although it would remove the second round pick.
    31 mai à 13 h 20
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 116
    Mentions "j'aime": 141
    Quoting: JuanDamienNebraska
    Stephenson will sign for more term and more money, especially if you expect him to sign with CHI. Marchessault likely commands more term as well, but that Stephenson contract is particularly bad.


    Did you watch Stephenson last year?

    I could see the hawks bumping up to 6.25 mil but I don’t think he can command too much term
    31 mai à 13 h 30
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2022
    Messages: 10,032
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,637
    Not enough value in swapping pick #72 and Raddysh for pick #62 and taking Ceci. Hawks probably pass on that. I agree w/ the Wings fan too. Wings won't swap #15 for #18 to add a late 2nd. Wings would want the Hawks to take a bad contract.
    cagauf, aedoran et Bedsy_Burner a aimé ceci.
    31 mai à 13 h 34
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2023
    Messages: 2,722
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,429
    Quoting: cagauf
    Did you watch Stephenson last year?

    I could see the hawks bumping up to 6.25 mil but I don’t think he can command too much term


    This years center market is very weak. He will easily get more than 2 years term.
    cagauf et Bedsy_Burner a aimé ceci.
    31 mai à 13 h 41
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 116
    Mentions "j'aime": 141
    Quoting: JuanDamienNebraska
    This years center market is very weak. He will easily get more than 2 years term.


    I do agree that he could get it for sure. I think a team would take him on at 5x5 but depends what he wants to do.
    I think it would be smart for him to take a shorter deal for bigger money in Chicago where he is guaranteed top 6 minutes and than he could cash in better on his next deal once the cap goes up.
    Bedsy_Burner a aimé ceci.
    31 mai à 13 h 52
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2017
    Messages: 22,279
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,354
    If Tyler wants to reunite with Yzerman he can sign with Detroit in the offseason. But Detroit isn't paying for a 33yr old who will be a UFA in less than a month.

    Take Tyler out of the trade and take Fabbri back with you. Fabbri easily fits into your top 9 and probably into your top 6.
    31 mai à 13 h 55
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 116
    Mentions "j'aime": 141
    Quoting: aedoran
    If Tyler wants to reunite with Yzerman he can sign with Detroit in the offseason. But Detroit isn't paying for a 33yr old who will be a UFA in less than a month.

    Take Tyler out of the trade and take Fabbri back with you. Fabbri easily fits into your top 9 and probably into your top 6.


    Johnson was literally just a throw in. I didn’t attribute any value to that, but yes I agree that the hawks would be willing to take on a bad contract if they prefer instead of the second rounder.

    Would the wings to Fabri and the 15th for the 18th and a third maybe?
    aedoran a aimé ceci.
    31 mai à 13 h 56
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2023
    Messages: 2,722
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,429
    Quoting: cagauf
    I do agree that he could get it for sure. I think a team would take him on at 5x5 but depends what he wants to do.
    I think it would be smart for him to take a shorter deal for bigger money in Chicago where he is guaranteed top 6 minutes and than he could cash in better on his next deal once the cap goes up.


    I couldn’t disagree more. His resume is more than solid enough to get him term at a solid number, even on a contending team. He’s 30, he should take advantage of the weak center market now and get his term.
    Bedsy_Burner a aimé ceci.
    31 mai à 14 h 0
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 11,385
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,803
    I guess it would depend on how the draft played out and who was available. For me personally there would have to be 3 of Sennecke, MBN, Jiricek, Connolly, Eiserman or maybe one or two in forgetting about for it to be worth it. We need more high end talent and I feel like the draft falls off a bit after 18.
    Ideally we would take that second and ours and package it to move up to the late first round/ early second round. This deal isn't as far out as some might think but honestly I would rather just make the pick and ideally get our player. MBN is my first pick of Catton and Iginla are gone. Sennecke is my second. If those guys are gone and there are still a couple players of interest on the board then I think it's decent.
    aedoran et cagauf a aimé ceci.
    31 mai à 14 h 7
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2017
    Messages: 22,279
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,354
    Quoting: cagauf
    Johnson was literally just a throw in. I didn’t attribute any value to that, but yes I agree that the hawks would be willing to take on a bad contract if they prefer instead of the second rounder.

    Would the wings to Fabri and the 15th for the 18th and a third maybe?


    If this is a draft day trade, then I have no problem with that.
    cagauf a aimé ceci.
    31 mai à 14 h 13
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 24,327
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,846
    Quoting: Droakner
    Oilers will probably accept that tbh, both sides receiving something they need in a way

    Raddysh has no value at all, Edmonton won't have to trade down at the draft to move Ceci. He has value as a top-4 RHD on a low risk contract.
    Droakner a aimé ceci.
    31 mai à 14 h 57
    #17
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 116
    Mentions "j'aime": 141
    Quoting: CD282
    Raddysh has no value at all, Edmonton won't have to trade down at the draft to move Ceci. He has value as a top-4 RHD on a low risk contract.


    Ceci has no value he hasn’t been terrible but teams won’t just do the Oilers a favour by taking him considering there will be better options in free agency at the same price.
    31 mai à 14 h 59
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 1,201
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,583
    The differnce between 15 & 18 is an early 3rd on the sound of hockey value chart. I understand why Detroit would not do that though...for the same reasons the Hawks would want to as there seems to be a significant drop in prospect quality right around or after that pick so the 3 spots probably means ending up with a guy in a lower tier on your board.

    I would take a Holl dump, but it would need to be fair value to do it as in a decent 2nd in value attached to him. Maybe something like #15, Holl and Berggren for #18, #50 & #67. 15 for 18 & 67 are just about fair value (I know these trade don't get done without an "overpay" to the higher pick and this don't happen as a standalone w/o the rest). Holl dump (has to be a 2nd in value of some sort to take him) + a 2nd for Berggren is the overpay /incentive to do the picks portion.
    cagauf a aimé ceci.
    31 mai à 15 h 1
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 24,327
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,846
    Quoting: cagauf
    Ceci has no value he hasn’t been terrible but teams won’t just do the Oilers a favour by taking him considering there will be better options in free agency at the same price.

    RHD are like gold in this league. Philadelphia gave up a 1st+ for Ristolainen, so Ceci has value.
    31 mai à 15 h 18
    #20
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 1,201
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,583
    Quoting: CD282
    RHD are like gold in this league. Philadelphia gave up a 1st+ for Ristolainen, so Ceci has value.


    Good RHD...sure. Ceci....not so much. Ristolainen was a top 10 pick coming off 5 straight 40+ point seasons prior to the covid year when he got moved for those picks. Pretty sure the flyers would love to rid themselves of his contract too if they could, so not sure he is the guy I would pick to try to make a causation arguement on behalf of Ceci's value.
    cagauf a aimé ceci.
    31 mai à 15 h 23
    #21
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 24,327
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,846
    Quoting: wojohawk
    Good RHD...sure. Ceci....not so much. Ristolainen was a top 10 pick coming off 5 straight 40+ point seasons prior to the covid year when he got moved for those picks. Pretty sure the flyers would love to rid themselves of his contract too if they could, so not sure he is the guy I would pick to try to make a causation arguement on behalf of Ceci's value.


    Ceci is better defensively and gets paid over $2M less... and I wasn't comparing their value but pointing out the market for RHD.
    31 mai à 16 h 38
    #22
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2022
    Messages: 768
    Mentions "j'aime": 181
    Why would Marchessault and Stephenson sign without term?
    31 mai à 16 h 51
    #23
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 116
    Mentions "j'aime": 141
    Quoting: capsleafs447
    Why would Marchessault and Stephenson sign without term?


    To get higher AAVs. Lots of contenders are going to be cap strapped so it might make more sense for them to do smaller terms with big money
    capsleafs447 a aimé ceci.
    31 mai à 17 h 28
    #24
    uWu Garak
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2024
    Messages: 853
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,231
    Everything has pretty much been said. So, I'll just say this. I think if teams don't panic on taking defensemen, Jiricek could easily go in the 2nd round. I think people have him far too high right now.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage