SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Because Screw It and Why Not

Créé par: KingofRnR
Équipe: 2024-25 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 7 mai 2024
Publié: 7 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Really not a Fan of PLD, but Markstrom is likely on his way out and may be agreeable to going to LAK this time, so making a French line for Huberdeau, which includes Speedy Duclair, who he’s proven to have had chemistry with already

I like Ryan Graves and think he would be a good fit on the Flames as a Big Penalty Killing D-Man to replace the lost size in Zadorov, but who can also contribute offense as well

Let’s give Calgary Born and Former Hitmen Jake Bean a chance to make the Team. He’d be good insurance & competiton for Kylington and can play both sides

Bringing back Big Save Dave as a Mentor for Wolf and/or competition for fellow Czech Vladar

Love Pospisil, but he’s really a Bottom-6 Player. Let’s see what he does at Centre with Offensive Wingers in Pelletier & Coronato and Physical Wingers in Greer & Hunt/Klapka/Schwindt

It’ll be a tough call between whether to Waive Hunt & Schwindt, but Klapka is still Waivers Exempt, so can be protected. 7th D-Man either be Bean, Pachal or Solovyov

Plenty of Cap Space remains to make moves. Another Big Shut Down Penalty Killing 3RD would be ideal, but I’m still curious about Bean and Pachal did a decent job, so start with them for now. Would love Tanev to return but that’s doubtful. Another 3RD target could be Jani Hakanpaa
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2787 500 $
2787 500 $
2787 500 $
2850 000 $
2787 500 $
2787 500 $
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
3800 000 $
11 500 000 $
1950 000 $
44 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Graves, Ryan
Détails additionnels:
PIT dumps Graves and his Contract
PIT
  1. Okhotiuk, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. Bean, Jake [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
CLB chooses not to Qualify Bean
3.
CGY
  1. Dubois, Pierre-Luc
  2. Pinelli, Francesco
Détails additionnels:
Not a Fan of PLD, but making a Frenchy Line for Huberdeau
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de DAL
Logo de CGY
Logo de VGK
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de VGK
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2487 500 000 $80 038 333 $0 $1 062 500 $7 461 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
850 000 $850 000 $
AG
RFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
RFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
RFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $ (150 000 $$150K150 000 $$150K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
845 000 $845 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
RFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
RFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 mai à 18 h 55
#1
Pens are better
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 1,906
Mentions "j'aime": 598
Pens accept
KingofRnR a aimé ceci.
7 mai à 18 h 59
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,982
Mentions "j'aime": 20,002
Please no to PLD
KingofRnR a aimé ceci.
7 mai à 19 h 41
#3
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Please no to PLD

Right, I don’t particularly care for his laziness and entitlement either, but a Big Skilled Physical Centre like Huberdeau had in Barkov and Bennett with a Speedy Winger like Duclair would probably do him wonders. I’d love to see Pospisil on a line with Huberdeau, but don’t think he brings enough finishing skill
7 mai à 19 h 47
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,982
Mentions "j'aime": 20,002
Quoting: KingofRnR
Right, I don’t particularly care for his laziness and entitlement either, but a Big Skilled Physical Centre like Huberdeau had in Barkov and Bennett with a Speedy Winger like Duclair would probably do him wonders. I’d love to see Pospisil on a line with Huberdeau, but don’t think he brings enough finishing skill


I would rather just acquire futures and keep Zary at center. He looked really good there and his playstyle is very similar to guys like Trocheck and Bennett
KingofRnR a aimé ceci.
7 mai à 20 h 21
#5
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I would rather just acquire futures and keep Zary at center. He looked really good there and his playstyle is very similar to guys like Trocheck and Bennett

Sure, but Zary lacks Physicality by comparison

I was thinking of putting Zary at 3C and moving Backlund down to 4C and rolling the lines, but figured Zary deserves to be in the Top-6
7 mai à 20 h 22
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,982
Mentions "j'aime": 20,002
Quoting: KingofRnR
Sure, but Zary lacks Physicality by comparison


Sure but Bennett's physicality was not what made him mesh with Huberdeau. It was his ability to carry the puck up ice and break out of the zone.
7 mai à 20 h 29
#7
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Sure but Bennett's physicality was not what made him mesh with Huberdeau. It was his ability to carry the puck up ice and break out of the zone.

Bennett’s Physicality created more space for his wingers too
7 mai à 20 h 35
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,982
Mentions "j'aime": 20,002
Quoting: KingofRnR
Bennett’s Physicality created more space for his wingers too


I guess, but it also often took himself out of the play in the process. I would just stick with Huberdeau - Zary - Sharangovich for next season. I think both of those players pair very well with Huberdeau
KingofRnR a aimé ceci.
7 mai à 21 h 2
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,939
Mentions "j'aime": 3,327
Modifié 7 mai à 21 h 8
Why do you have Pittsburgh getting assets for dumping a contract? With all that term left on his contract Calgary would want retention on Graves to take him even just for future considerations.

I'd rather keep Sharky. Make it Markstrom + Mangi with retention on Mangi. Probably need to remove Pinelli too for LA to consider it.
KingofRnR et Bast a aimé ceci.
7 mai à 22 h 4
#10
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: MoxNix
Why do you have Pittsburgh getting assets for dumping a contract? With all that term left on his contract Calgary would want retention on Graves to take him even just for future considerations.

I'd rather keep Sharky. Make it Markstrom + Mangi with retention on Mangi. Probably need to remove Pinelli too for LA to consider it.

Meh, I think Graves is worth what Zadorov fetched, especially given he has term, but I’d be happy to pay less for sure

Yeah that works too. I just started with Markstrom and added another decent piece to entice LAK, but then figured we needed a prospect back if we were parting with Sharky. I guess I was thinking if we couldn’t get a favourable extension done with Sharangovich, we’d move him in a Trade for a Big & Skilled Physical Centre
7 mai à 23 h 32
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,939
Mentions "j'aime": 3,327
Quoting: KingofRnR
Meh, I think Graves is worth what Zadorov fetched, especially given he has term, but I’d be happy to pay less for sure

Yeah that works too. I just started with Markstrom and added another decent piece to entice LAK, but then figured we needed a prospect back if we were parting with Sharky. I guess I was thinking if we couldn’t get a favourable extension done with Sharangovich, we’d move him in a Trade for a Big & Skilled Physical Centre


The problem with Graves' contract is he has too much term. 2 years would ideal, 3 would be ok, 5 is 2 years too long.

And yeah if we can't get Sharky extended without overpaying then we should trade him but that's a decision that should be deferred until sometime next year... Unless of course we get a terrific offer for him now.
7 mai à 23 h 50
#12
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,979
Mentions "j'aime": 3,464
Pretty sure Bean gets qualified regardless. We might end up losing him on waivers shortly thereafter anyways or some similar silly scenario, but I don't think he'll be allowed to walk.
8 mai à 0 h 23
#13
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: MoxNix
The problem with Graves' contract is he has too much term. 2 years would ideal, 3 would be ok, 5 is 2 years too long.

And yeah if we can't get Sharky extended without overpaying then we should trade him but that's a decision that should be deferred until sometime next year... Unless of course we get a terrific offer for him now.


Quoting: MoxNix
The problem with Graves' contract is he has too much term. 2 years would ideal, 3 would be ok, 5 is 2 years too long.

And yeah if we can't get Sharky extended without overpaying then we should trade him but that's a decision that should be deferred until sometime next year... Unless of course we get a terrific offer for him now.

Graves will only be 33 going on 34 when his contract expires. His Term is a non issue and he’s a Tradeable Asset AFAIC. He’s a Good Big Rugged Defensemen, something we need
8 mai à 4 h 23
#14
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 461
Quoting: Imagine874859
Pens accept


careful on that, it depends who else they can bring in.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage