Not nearly enough for Marner

I don’t see the Hawks trading anything of value for Marner unless he comes with a long-term extension.

And not some nonsense $11.5M extension. We've already been down the Seth Jones Path. We don't want a Seth Jones 2.0. Which makes this type of trade so difficult. We can pay up as a UFA if we want to without losing assets. It's more likely Hawks send current roster players vs picks/prospects. TOR is trying to win now and CHI is still rebuilding. Murphy 50% retained is likely the best option plus Kurashev. Hawks won't retain on Seth Jones. Too long a contract.

Hawks aren't interested in a one year Marner rental, that's why not.

Leafs pass lmao

Forgot to say it comes with a contract or contract promise

Change Nolan Allen to Sam Rinzel and its a deal.

With an extension, then yeah, Hawks probably accept.