SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

tmljk22

tmljk22
Membre depuis
26 mars 2017
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Messages dans les forums
296
Messages par jour
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GM1 mars à 14 h 54
Forum: Armchair-GM5 juill. 2023 à 10 h 12
Forum: Armchair-GM30 juin 2023 à 22 h 34
Sujet: Treliving Leafs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>digitalbath</b></div><div>2 prospects that have never nor probably will ever play in the NHL. Non factors at all. They don’t need to get rid of Karlsson, he has a positive value. The trade would likely be Karlsson for 2x1st and then a high end prospect, without taking Murray or Brodie, Leafs were on the verge of buying them out, why would they take on 9m to “get out from” 9m taking on Murray means pay even more than 2x1st and a high end prospect.</div></div>

Let's get to the real world man. Karlsson before this season was being mentioned in the same breath as some of the worst contracts in the league and with a lengthy injury history at his age, his value still isn't exactly sky high anymore.

Also, does everyone seem to forget what the value on Karlsson's last trade was? 3 bottom of the roster players, a prospect and a first. This deal is similar if not better than that in a vacuum as long as you don't use hindsight and act like everyone knew Norris would turn into a great player and the Sharks would tank to be a bottom 3 team in 2020.
Forum: Armchair-GM30 juin 2023 à 22 h 25
Forum: Armchair-GM30 juin 2023 à 12 h 16
Forum: Armchair-GM20 mai 2023 à 10 h 44
Sujet: More Fun Permutations
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CaseyFlyman</b></div><div>Yes, I'm sure Jarmo values him extremely highly still, but his offer was 4 years ago and context is important. That offer was pre-Gaudreau and pre-Laine, so Columbus just has very different needs now (which happen to be top line center and right pairing D).

"First round pick and top prospect" would be the starting point for most teams discussing a Mitch deal, but for Columbus, the 1st rounder and top prospect are much more valuable than most...and happen to theoretically fill both major needs.</div></div>

Totally agree. I’m still bummed that CLB didn’t win the lottery because with the current core, Bedard, and Jiricek (not even including the other great prospects they have) would be a hell of a lot of fun.
Forum: Armchair-GM20 mai 2023 à 9 h 46
Sujet: More Fun Permutations
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CaseyFlyman</b></div><div>It doesn't even make sense from CBJ's perspective to trade ONE of those straight-up for Marner. For that package, we're looking at Matthews with an extension. (CBJ would still need to add in that scenario, but that's the kind of player we'd need to be looking at to move those pieces).</div></div>

Regardless of what our thoughts are on this, Jarmo offered Mitch more than what he’s getting paid now with the sticking point being years. Mitch has since gotten better so it’s fair to assume Jarmo still values him extremely highly.

This deal is about fair value for someone of Mitch’s caliber but it’s absolutely fair to say Columbus passes given their current needs and that the want for Marner is dampened by the addition of Gaudreau.
Forum: Armchair-GM19 mai 2023 à 14 h 4
Sujet: In the summertime
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Keep on loving your own players, if they aren't providing good value for their contracts.....maybe just fair value.
You're the one with bag over your eyes, if you can't see how badly the Leafs have managed their cap,</div></div>

Palhal, you’ve been out here for years dunking on players and have been calling for some of the worst valued deals I’ve ever seen. Nylander is the first that comes to mind, specifically around the time he was holding out. I get that you hate your own team but stop acting like you’re seeing something we’re not.

Have the Leafs created a situation in which it’s harder to build a deep roster? Absolutely they have, have they continued to work around it affectively? Yes, in a vacuum they absolutely have. Will one of the core 4 be traded this summer? Almost certainly, but expecting the type of value you’re insinuating is on par with your takes about Nylander however many years ago.
Forum: Armchair-GM19 mai 2023 à 10 h 2
Sujet: testtest
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NYR1983</b></div><div>Can’t see how people think leafs will ever “win” on the face of a trade of any of the big 4. AM will be looking for 13m+, Willy 11M+, marner 13m+ all while JT is 11M. Keeping them makes the team considerably worse as well as you will be filling in league min deals for the rest of the roster.</div></div>

Teams that move on from the best player in the deal almost always lose the trade. But trading one of those top players should never involve significantly downgrading without at least gaining draft capital. Also, why would the Leafs ever make this deal when Nylander is the cheapest of the three.

People on here are two ignorant to realize that GM’s are blinded by their anti-leafs bias and that trading on of the core four isn’t a cap-dump which is essentially what everyone in this platform treats it as.