SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Total Overhaul

Créé par: ImACashew10
Équipe: 2024-25 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 28 avr. 2024
Publié: 29 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Trades up the wazoo I’m sure everyone will agree on all of them. Still sticking with a Ray Shero / Dean Evason combo.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
13 200 000 $
65 000 000 $
64 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 800 000 $
1800 000 $
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Ristolainen, Rasmus
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
PHI
  1. Merzlikins, Elvis
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
2.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (BUF)
Détails additionnels:
Top 10 protected
3.
CBJ
  1. Zegras, Trevor
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Johnson, Kent [Droits de RFA]
  2. Ristolainen, Rasmus
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (BUF)
4.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
OTT
  1. Boqvist, Adam
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (CBJ)
5.
CBJ
  1. Burakovsky, André
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (SEA)
SEA
  1. Bean, Jake [Droits de RFA]
  2. Laine, Patrik
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de OTT
Logo de SEA
Logo de CBJ
Logo de ANA
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
2025
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SEA
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
2026
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de NYR
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de PIT
Logo de CBJ
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2287 700 000 $76 680 000 $0 $4 700 000 $11 020 000 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 200 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 7
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
886 667 $886 667 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 avr. à 20 h 49
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,371
Mentions "j'aime": 3,118
I’d rather just keep Johnson over zegras
Viqsi a aimé ceci.
29 avr. à 20 h 58
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 387
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Where is that account that says “you all ready know about Boone” on every armchair GM?
ChestNut33 et JokiStan a aimé ceci.
29 avr. à 20 h 59
#3
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,413
Mentions "j'aime": 4,754
I… don’t actually hate this. I do not like the idea of Shero/Evason, but I don’t hate most of your trades. Which I didn’t expect when I read your description.

Definitely decline the Seattle one, though. Hang onto Laine for now. And Buffalo needs to pay more than that. Otherwise… I wouldn’t be upset.
29 avr. à 21 h 0
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 327
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: Dcochy
Where is that account that says “you all ready know about Boone” on every armchair GM?


Can someone translate?
29 avr. à 21 h 6
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 387
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: ImACashew10
Can someone translate?


An account on here types this message on any trade involving Boone Jenner

“You asked for Boone. You already know the answer.”

Same thing, every damn post.
29 avr. à 21 h 7
#6
Danny B is here
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 5,063
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Flyers immediately decline.
29 avr. à 21 h 15
#7
Gary M
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 88
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Buffalo says yes. You might even get more than that from Buffalo.
29 avr. à 21 h 20
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,949
Mentions "j'aime": 1,970
The only incentive ANA has to trade Zegras is if we land yet another at or near NHL ready LHC in the draft (Celebrini or Lindstrom).

It makes absolutely no sense to then flip Zegras for another LHC
29 avr. à 21 h 54
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 327
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: Jded
The only incentive ANA has to trade Zegras is if we land yet another at or near NHL ready LHC in the draft (Celebrini or Lindstrom).

It makes absolutely no sense to then flip Zegras for another LHC


Too picky. Literally created another team where Utah’s 2024 1st - likely within striking distance of Lindstrom - was traded for Zegras and people complained saying, “why would we trade a sure thing for a maybe.”
29 avr. à 22 h 58
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,618
Mentions "j'aime": 1,069
Quoting: squashmaple
I… don’t actually hate this. I do not like the idea of Shero/Evason, but I don’t hate most of your trades. Which I didn’t expect when I read your description.

Definitely decline the Seattle one, though. Hang onto Laine for now. And Buffalo needs to pay more than that. Otherwise… I wouldn’t be upset.


You…like trading Jenner…for a 1st? Gotta disagree. Jenner is a no-go. I also don’t like that Ristolainen trade. There literally no way anyway anyone would want Ristolainen.
Viqsi a aimé ceci.
29 avr. à 23 h 6
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 327
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: Jacketsman61
You…like trading Jenner…for a 1st? Gotta disagree. Jenner is a no-go. I also don’t like that Ristolainen trade. There literally no way anyway anyone would want Ristolainen.


Gudbranson and Chiarot are making $4m+ with term while other “old school” stay at home possession black holes like Joel Edmunson continue to be valued assets at the deadline. Someone will want Risto (side note, who will want Elvis??)

I’m understanding of the return coming back for Jenner being light but how does Jenner’s career arc align with the Jacksts contention window potentially reopening?
29 avr. à 23 h 12
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,618
Mentions "j'aime": 1,069
Quoting: ImACashew10
Gudbranson and Chiarot are making $4m+ with term while other “old school” stay at home possession black holes like Joel Edmunson continue to be valued assets at the deadline. Someone will want Risto (side note, who will want Elvis??)

I’m understanding of the return coming back for Jenner being light but how does Jenner’s career arc align with the Jacksts contention window potentially reopening?


In regards to Elvis, no one. I truly think if the Jackets want to part ways with him it will be via buyout. Jenner is just too valuable.
30 avr. à 0 h 11
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,949
Mentions "j'aime": 1,970
Quoting: ImACashew10
Too picky. Literally created another team where Utah’s 2024 1st - likely within striking distance of Lindstrom - was traded for Zegras and people complained saying, “why would we trade a sure thing for a maybe.”


First of all, the Utah 1st is not equal to Lindstrom. They have >50% odds of selecting 7th or 8th. Lindstrom will far more likely than not be drafted ahead of that.

2nd, even if he did fall there. If you asked me who I prefer, Zegras or Lindstrom, I personally do choose Zegras.

Picky? Sure. I’m not really sure why you wouldn’t be picky with your multi-year 60+ point scoring center who just turned 23. And unless they draft a LHC, there is zero reason to trade him. Does that mean they should draft a LHC like Lindstrom? No. But they should take the best player available, and it’s plausible that’s him
30 avr. à 7 h 40
#14
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,413
Mentions "j'aime": 4,754
Quoting: Jacketsman61
You…like trading Jenner…for a 1st? Gotta disagree. Jenner is a no-go. I also don’t like that Ristolainen trade. There literally no way anyway anyone would want Ristolainen.


Anaheim, who need a stable, mature defenseman and RHD, just might. Especially if he’s coming with KJ and an unprotected first like that (even if they give up Zegras in the process). Might have to add one more piece for Anaheim and take out the pick from them. Or make the first being traded Columbus’s own instead of Buffalo’s. But the base trade isn’t horrible. Fan trades are always more dramatic than IRL ones end up being, anyway.

I also very clearly said the Jenner trade would need more, but yes, I am open to moving him. Especially for a good return.
30 avr. à 10 h 52
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,618
Mentions "j'aime": 1,069
Quoting: squashmaple
Anaheim, who need a stable, mature defenseman and RHD, just might. Especially if he’s coming with KJ and an unprotected first like that (even if they give up Zegras in the process). Might have to add one more piece for Anaheim and take out the pick from them. Or make the first being traded Columbus’s own instead of Buffalo’s. But the base trade isn’t horrible. Fan trades are always more dramatic than IRL ones end up being, anyway.

I also very clearly said the Jenner trade would need more, but yes, I am open to moving him. Especially for a good return.


I would move Severson in that deal if he would waive his NTC or even move Boqvist and Guddy. The Philly trade, to me, is just unnecessary. Would rather buyout Elvis than have to take back a terrible contract.
30 avr. à 14 h 5
#16
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 7,069
Mentions "j'aime": 3,539
Quoting: Dcochy
Where is that account that says “you all ready know about Boone” on every armchair GM?

Not every one. Just most of them, because people keep assuming he's available for "fair market value" or something like that when he and the front office and ownership have all been repeatedly clear about keeping him in Columbus.

And as far as I'm concerned folks complaining about my posting that each time yet still posting these AGMs just clearly indicates I need to be posting it even more.

So yeah. It's Boone. Y'all already know the answer.
30 avr. à 20 h 36
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 387
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: Viqsi
Not every one. Just most of them, because people keep assuming he's available for "fair market value" or something like that when he and the front office and ownership have all been repeatedly clear about keeping him in Columbus.

And as far as I'm concerned folks complaining about my posting that each time yet still posting these AGMs just clearly indicates I need to be posting it even more.

So yeah. It's Boone. Y'all already know the answer.


Yeah, this guy.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage