SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How much are they worth 4

Créé par: MrAicrow2009
Équipe: 2024-25 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 29 avr. 2024
Publié: 29 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
PIT
  1. Chinakhov, Yegor [Droits de RFA]
CBJ
3.
4.
5.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2026
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1887 500 000 $83 304 342 $0 $0 $4 195 658 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 375 000 $5 375 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 avr. à 16 h 56
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,311
Mentions "j'aime": 3,041
Not sure the Pens have anything that the jackets would want for chinakhov
29 avr. à 16 h 57
#2
Démarrer sujet
Get Jake Back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 560
Mentions "j'aime": 137
Quoting: SK101
Not sure the Pens have anything that the jackets would want for chinakhov


Well what would the Jackets want for chinakov?
29 avr. à 17 h 2
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,311
Mentions "j'aime": 3,041
Quoting: MrAicrow2009
Well what would the Jackets want for chinakov?


Idk maybe package him for a proven top 6 forward. Doesn’t make sense to trade him really. He’s still very young and has gotten better every season. He fits the timeline. Trading him for a draft pick doesn’t really make sense because he’s better than what a mid to late first usually becomes and that just resets the timeline
29 avr. à 17 h 4
#4
Démarrer sujet
Get Jake Back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 560
Mentions "j'aime": 137
Quoting: SK101
Idk maybe package him for a proven top 6 forward. Doesn’t make sense to trade him really. He’s still very young and has gotten better every season. He fits the timeline. Trading him for a draft pick doesn’t really make sense because he’s better than what a mid to late first usually becomes and that just resets the timeline


Rakell, Rust and Smith fit Proven Top 6 Forward, But Smith and Rakell are to expensive and Rust is to Valuable
29 avr. à 17 h 9
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,311
Mentions "j'aime": 3,041
Quoting: MrAicrow2009
Rakell, Rust and Smith fit Proven Top 6 Forward, But Smith and Rakell are to expensive and Rust is to Valuable


Yeah jackets wouldn’t have any interest in those players. Smith and rackell are cap dumps to the jackets. Rust is too old. Guess I should add the top 6 forwards would have to be youngish (25 or younger)
29 avr. à 17 h 9
#6
Démarrer sujet
Get Jake Back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 560
Mentions "j'aime": 137
Quoting: SK101
Yeah jackets wouldn’t have any interest in those players. Smith and rackell are cap dumps to the jackets. Rust is too old. Guess I should add the top 6 forwards would have to be youngish (25 or younger)


Closest player to that is Drew o'Connor, but he is not proven
29 avr. à 17 h 14
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,311
Mentions "j'aime": 3,041
Quoting: MrAicrow2009
Closest player to that is Drew o'Connor, but he is not proven


He’s a solid player but chinakhov is younger and outproduced him and O’Connor was playing with Crosby
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
29 avr. à 17 h 15
#8
Démarrer sujet
Get Jake Back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 560
Mentions "j'aime": 137
Quoting: SK101
He’s a solid player but chinakhov is younger and outproduced him and O’Connor was playing with Crosby


Guess Chinakov is not available for Pittsburgh than
29 avr. à 17 h 27
#9
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,922
Mentions "j'aime": 3,419
Quoting: SK101
Not sure the Pens have anything that the jackets would want for chinakhov

I'd be interested in picking up Petterson, myself.
29 avr. à 17 h 28
#10
Démarrer sujet
Get Jake Back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 560
Mentions "j'aime": 137
Quoting: Viqsi
I'd be interested in picking up Petterson, myself.


For What?
29 avr. à 17 h 29
#11
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,922
Mentions "j'aime": 3,419
Quoting: MrAicrow2009
For What?

Well, you were just asking about Chinakhov. wink
29 avr. à 17 h 30
#12
Démarrer sujet
Get Jake Back
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 560
Mentions "j'aime": 137
Quoting: Viqsi
Well, you were just asking about Chinakhov. wink


I would say Pettersson is worth a 2nd and a 3rd or a 3rd and a B+ Defense Prospect, He has done well for the Pens
Edit: A 1st and a C+ Prospect, He is a very good Defensemen
29 avr. à 17 h 34
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 1,952
Quoting: MrAicrow2009
I would say Pettersson is worth a 2nd and a 3rd or a 3rd and a B+ Defense Prospect, He has done well for the Pens


Honestly, that's probably about what Chinakhov would be worth. Not quite enough to warrant a 1st, but could still fetch one (or similar) if it turned into a bidding war.

I'd hate to trade Chinakhov now, because he's incredibly fast with a blistering shot, and could absolutely break out in the next two years...but I'd probably move him 1 for 1 for Pettersson if Pittsburgh was open to it. Dependent on also shipping out Provorov, though, but that feels like a given.
Viqsi a aimé ceci.
29 avr. à 17 h 51
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,311
Mentions "j'aime": 3,041
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
Honestly, that's probably about what Chinakhov would be worth. Not quite enough to warrant a 1st, but could still fetch one (or similar) if it turned into a bidding war.

I'd hate to trade Chinakhov now, because he's incredibly fast with a blistering shot, and could absolutely break out in the next two years...but I'd probably move him 1 for 1 for Pettersson if Pittsburgh was open to it. Dependent on also shipping out Provorov, though, but that feels like a given.


Problem with pettersson is he only has one year remaining. If he would sign a 4 year or so extension for a similar salary I would do it
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
29 avr. à 18 h 47
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,711
Mentions "j'aime": 4,626
Girard I still hold with the Hronek trade as a template, and it would almost certainly have to be pure futures if the Avs decided he was the piece they're moving.
29 avr. à 18 h 52
#16
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,514
Mentions "j'aime": 3,704
I'll preface this by saying I think it would be a mistake to trade Girard:

Girard is underrated by most non-Avs fans but the deal with the Avs trading roster players is that they'd be doing it to free up space while also not creating a big hole in the roster. So, they'd need a solid NHL-ready D that can move the puck to play in his top-4 spot that doesn't cost a lot plus a 2nd. I know that's a tall order but you'd be getting a very good cost-controlled D that can move the puck, plays solid D and has a good amount of term left.
29 avr. à 19 h 27
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,578
Mentions "j'aime": 9,199
Col traded Newhook for a 1st and 2nd last year, Girard is worth more and COL doesn’t want to trade him. So the words over pay come to mind.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
29 avr. à 21 h 4
#18
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,792
Mentions "j'aime": 450
first 3 won't be moved.
Suter is 40, why the hell would you want that.
Luostarinen is interesting but he won't be worth the asking price imo.
30 avr. à 16 h 15
#19
Pens are better
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 1,896
Mentions "j'aime": 598
Quoting: MrAicrow2009
I would say Pettersson is worth a 2nd and a 3rd or a 3rd and a B+ Defense Prospect, He has done well for the Pens
Edit: A 1st and a C+ Prospect, He is a very good Defensemen


We should not be trading Pettersson at all. At this point he is worth just about as much as Hanifin was this deadline. One of the best Defensive Defenseman in the league
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage