You would lowkey have to add Marner to that Flames trade to make it even...

Remove Andersson and then you may have a deal

i think a top 7 pick for andersson is fair enough

Marky isnt worth a top 10 pick at 34 yrs old lol

No chance Utah does that for a rental. They wouldn't trade the pick alone

Switch the pick to a leafs first then but Andersson isn’t part of that trade unless its a significant package.

So instead of having dvorak at 4.45m for one more year montreal will have Järnkrok next year at 4.325m and he has a longer contract at 2.1m ?!?! And montreal will be using their last retention slot ?!?! Help me make sense of it

Habs pass

I'm gonna be completely honest I misread the trade and thought you included Leafs 1st not Arizona's lol. Still, Kampf is a negative asset and Liljegren does not hold as much value as us Leafs fans would like to believe. I think that probably gets you 75% there, maybe throw in Knies?

They're literally getting a top 5 pick... Idk if you need to add that much more

Sens have a beautiful defenseman or C in Chabot or Norris for Marner if you'd like

Calgary wouldn't accept Marner even if Utah was dumb enough to give up their 1st for 1 year of a soft overpaid perimeter player who vanishes in the playoffs. It'd take Nylander, or Knies + 2024 1st and more to get both Marky with retention and Andersson.

I can see Bumbling Brad overpaying twice for either one. Once to acquire the player and again later to extend Chychrun or dump Chabot.