SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Go for Laine

Équipe: 2024-25 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 23 avr. 2024
Publié: 23 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2785 000 $
3775 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
21 350 000 $
1850 000 $
1850 000 $
1905 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1885 000 $
64 655 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Laine, Patrik (2 714 400 $ retained)
CBJ
  1. Eller, Lars
  2. Ilyin, Mikhail [Liste de réserve]
  3. Koivunen, Ville
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
2026 1st Top-10 Protected (Becomes 2027 1st Unprotected)
2.
PIT
  1. Kovacevic, Johnathan
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
MTL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2026 (PIT)
3.
TOR
  1. Bemström, Emil [Droits de RFA]
  2. Smith, Reilly (2 200 000 $ retained)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2026
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2386 500 000 $85 991 609 $0 $20 000 $508 391 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 985 600 $5 985 600 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
4 655 000 $4 655 000 $
C
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 375 000 $5 375 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
885 000 $885 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 avr. à 6 h 8
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 104
Mentions "j'aime": 59
habs decline. kovacevic has more value than moving down 120 spots in the draft
23 avr. à 6 h 39
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 3,625
Mentions "j'aime": 1,221
Leafs have absolutely no reason to make that trade 🤦🏻
23 avr. à 7 h 2
#3
Pens are better
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 1,826
Mentions "j'aime": 583
Quoting: MitchJr
Leafs have absolutely no reason to make that trade 🤦🏻


Neither do the pens. Neither of those guys are worths 2nds
23 avr. à 7 h 2
#4
Pens are better
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 1,826
Mentions "j'aime": 583
I wouldnt mind taking a shot at Laine, but I'm not moving a 1st to do so.
23 avr. à 7 h 28
#5
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,491
Mentions "j'aime": 4,381
CBJ pass. Very mid package with some dumps that we don’t need, and that’s even before we talk (1) retention; and, (2) trading inter-division a player with term.
SK101, BoomerTheHero et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
23 avr. à 7 h 48
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 3,625
Mentions "j'aime": 1,221
Quoting: Imagine874859
Neither do the pens. Neither of those guys are worths 2nds


Robertson would have been 3rd on your team in goals / 60 min and 4th on your team in actual goals at 5v5 (while playing only 56 games & 11 min / game), but 👌.
23 avr. à 9 h 36
#7
DNP1932
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 156
Mentions "j'aime": 64
Quoting: dopplsan
CBJ pass. Very mid package with some dumps that we don’t need, and that’s even before we talk (1) retention; and, (2) trading inter-division a player with term.


There’s not even a dump lmao, that’s just making the cap work id assume, not saying we should make that trade from a pens standpoint, but the package is actually pretty good for an underachieving, injury prone winger. But yeah the retention is a huge thing.
23 avr. à 9 h 52
#8
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,749
Mentions "j'aime": 3,243
Quoting: DNP1932
There’s not even a dump lmao, that’s just making the cap work id assume, not saying we should make that trade from a pens standpoint, but the package is actually pretty good for an underachieving, injury prone winger. But yeah the retention is a huge thing.

Laine isn't underachieving; when he's played in union blue, he's near-PPG. The injuries have largely been freak accidents, but yes, there've been entirely too many of them, so it's not unreasonable to hesitate on that basis. If we opt to move him, we'd want a package that's commesurate with a top-line near-PPG winger.
dopplsan a aimé ceci.
23 avr. à 9 h 53
#9
Pens are better
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 1,826
Mentions "j'aime": 583
Quoting: MitchJr
Robertson would have been 3rd on your team in goals / 60 min and 4th on your team in actual goals at 5v5 (while playing only 56 games & 11 min / game), but 👌.


I'm saying that they arent worth two 2nd round picks together. I think I worded my previous comment wrong. Maybe a 2nd and 5th for both of them. But we also have no interest in Timmins. Smith at 50% is also worth a 3rd at least. So overall this is an overpayment for the pens. Smith retained and a 3rd for Robertson is fair, you could make an argument for a 2nd instead of a 3rd but no more than that.
habs_trade_churner_50 a aimé ceci.
23 avr. à 10 h 7
#10
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,491
Mentions "j'aime": 4,381
Quoting: DNP1932
There’s not even a dump lmao, that’s just making the cap work id assume, not saying we should make that trade from a pens standpoint, but the package is actually pretty good for an underachieving, injury prone winger. But yeah the retention is a huge thing.


Yeah, I imagine Eller is in there for cap-balance; but, you're still talking a B6 F, which CBJ are already flush with, and doesn't add anything for CBJ. We'd probably just buy him out.

I know nothing about those prospects; but, I do know PIT's system is considered pretty weak, so can't say that really is a needle-mover.

The first is the get here, particularly if we are betting on PIT's decline to continue, and that '26 pick being top-half of the draft (or the '27 one being even higher). It's a better asset the more I think about it, but it's all based around a gamble.
habs_trade_churner_50 a aimé ceci.
23 avr. à 10 h 27
#11
DNP1932
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 156
Mentions "j'aime": 64
Quoting: dopplsan
Yeah, I imagine Eller is in there for cap-balance; but, you're still talking a B6 F, which CBJ are already flush with, and doesn't add anything for CBJ. We'd probably just buy him out.

I know nothing about those prospects; but, I do know PIT's system is considered pretty weak, so can't say that really is a needle-mover.

The first is the get here, particularly if we are betting on PIT's decline to continue, and that '26 pick being top-half of the draft (or the '27 one being even higher). It's a better asset the more I think about it, but it's all based around a gamble.


That is understandable, eller was just one of our better, tbh probably best FA. It is indeed bad, but Koivunen is a pretty damn good prospect, he’s PPG forward in Liiga, low scoring league and 20yo, Ilyin is 19, half PPG forward in KHL, so not as good, but could be decent if he grows more. Yeah i think both the 2026 and 2027 1st round picks should be untouchable, so imo no shot this happens, but it’s interesting.
23 avr. à 13 h 51
#12
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,325
Mentions "j'aime": 381
If dubas trades another 1st round pick he should be fired on the spot.
This is a bottom 10 finish club until otherwise proven differently.
24 avr. à 2 h 42
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 87
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: xxxtentacion69
habs decline. kovacevic has more value than moving down 120 spots in the draft


Do you mean move up. Montreal gets a 4th in 2026. Moving Kovacevic and a 2024 7th in the process.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage