SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Francouz retires

Créé par: Redmile04
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 20 avr. 2024
Publié: 20 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Ritchie, Calum [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
COL
  1. Markström, Jacob
Détails additionnels:
Retained 2000000
2.
CGY
  1. Savard, David
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (MIN)
MTL
  1. Mangiapane, Andrew
Détails additionnels:
Retained 25%
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de COL
Logo de CGY
Logo de DAL
Logo de CGY
Logo de VGK
Logo de MIN
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de VGK
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2587 500 000 $73 229 166 $0 $310 000 $14 270 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
813 333 $813 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 avr. à 1 h 6
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,192
Mentions "j'aime": 1,654
Can't afford him, and not giving up richie
Ausbear17, HockeyManiac95 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
20 avr. à 1 h 41
#2
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,048
Mentions "j'aime": 1,377
Massive overpayment for Markstrom.
HockeyManiac95 a aimé ceci.
20 avr. à 1 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,591
Mentions "j'aime": 3,218
Colorado declines the first trade, Calgary declines the second trade.
jfkst1, HockeyManiac95 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
20 avr. à 8 h 0
#4
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,494
Mentions "j'aime": 2,186
Why would we ever pay positive value for a third liner making 6m
20 avr. à 8 h 23
#5
and proud of it
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 2,261
Mentions "j'aime": 1,609
Ain't no way Markstrom is worth that much. Avs decline
TJTwolf et jfkst1 a aimé ceci.
20 avr. à 8 h 36
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,631
Mentions "j'aime": 19,735
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Why would we ever pay positive value for a third liner making 6m


Nothing in this comment made a single lick of sense.
1. Savard at 3.5M and a 3rd is hardly considered positive value
2. Mangiapane makes less than 6M
3. Mangiapane is being 25% retained in that proposal which would be cap hit of 4.35M
4. Calling Mangiapane a 3rd liner is quite ignorant, he's a middle 6er with a strong 2-way game and would still make ~6M on the open market, just like Terravainen will get this summer. He would also be 4th in even strength scoring on the Habs this season only behind their 1st line.
20 avr. à 9 h 5
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,566
Mentions "j'aime": 6,466
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Nothing in this comment made a single lick of sense.
1. Savard at 3.5M and a 3rd is hardly considered positive value
2. Mangiapane makes less than 6M
3. Mangiapane is being 25% retained in that proposal which would be cap hit of 4.35M
4. Calling Mangiapane a 3rd liner is quite ignorant, he's a middle 6er with a strong 2-way game and would still make ~6M on the open market, just like Terravainen will get this summer. He would also be 4th in even strength scoring on the Habs this season only behind their 1st line.


LMAO, never seen anyone get so upset about a player being called a 3rd liner just to immediately agree that he is a 3rd liner just in a completely different way. In case you don't understand what I mean let me break it down for you, the 3rd line is in the middle 6, can Mangiapane playe a 2nd line role, yes but so can Gallagher and Armia (two fairly comparable two way players) but ideally like Mangiapane they don't play above the 3rd line. That doesn't mean Mangiapane is a bad player or even overpaid in today's market, just that he isn't worth as much as you think he is. Typically to be considered a 2nd line player, you need more offensive production (either 60+ points on a yearly basis or 30+ goals), Mangiapane doesn't have the production, sorry. Habs don't need anymore depth players, we need actual 1st or 2nd line players who produce more than 60 points a season, especially if we are giving up one of our defensive leaders that is playing a pivotal role in developing our young up and coming D.
20 avr. à 9 h 36
#8
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,494
Mentions "j'aime": 2,186
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Nothing in this comment made a single lick of sense.
1. Savard at 3.5M and a 3rd is hardly considered positive value
2. Mangiapane makes less than 6M
3. Mangiapane is being 25% retained in that proposal which would be cap hit of 4.35M
4. Calling Mangiapane a 3rd liner is quite ignorant, he's a middle 6er with a strong 2-way game and would still make ~6M on the open market, just like Terravainen will get this summer. He would also be 4th in even strength scoring on the Habs this season only behind their 1st line.


1. Savard and a third is positive value
2. Sorry about a 200k difference
3. He is a 40 pts winger. You know who else average 40 pts pace each seasons while making 4,4m, Christian Dvorak
4. Terravainen has multiple 60 and 1 70 pts season under his belt, Mangiapane has nowhere close to that. Also, the third line is in the middle six if you didn’t know.

On the open market, Mangiapane would get 3m max. So he is very overpaid
20 avr. à 10 h 26
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,631
Mentions "j'aime": 19,735
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
1. Savard and a third is positive value
2. Sorry about a 200k difference
3. He is a 40 pts winger. You know who else average 40 pts pace each seasons while making 4,4m, Christian Dvorak
4. Terravainen has multiple 60 and 1 70 pts season under his belt, Mangiapane has nowhere close to that. Also, the third line is in the middle six if you didn’t know.

On the open market, Mangiapane would get 3m max. So he is very overpaid


1. Savard with retention has some value, but certainly not at full price. With the flooded winger market I doubt anyone would trade for Mangiapane without retention either.
3. Dvorak has literally never gotten 40 points once, at least be accurate in saying Mangiapane averages 45 points with almost no PP time.
4. Ignoring PP time again, Teravainen only had 26 EV points this year. The 3rd line would make you 7th-9th in average ice time among forwards, which Mangiapane was 4th-6th

3M max? You are on drugs 🤣 he is very fairly paid right now.

Mangiapane is not at all what Montreal needs right now and hell, they probably need Savard more until their young blue line develops into legitimate defensemen but to you are very poorly describing him as a player
20 avr. à 10 h 52
#10
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,494
Mentions "j'aime": 2,186
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
1. Savard with retention has some value, but certainly not at full price. With the flooded winger market I doubt anyone would trade for Mangiapane without retention either.
3. Dvorak has literally never gotten 40 points once, at least be accurate in saying Mangiapane averages 45 points with almost no PP time.
4. Ignoring PP time again, Teravainen only had 26 EV points this year. The 3rd line would make you 7th-9th in average ice time among forwards, which Mangiapane was 4th-6th

3M max? You are on drugs 🤣 he is very fairly paid right now.

Mangiapane is not at all what Montreal needs right now and hell, they probably need Savard more until their young blue line develops into legitimate defensemen but to you are very poorly describing him as a player


Savard is worth 3m easily lol. Without retention he gets at least a third

Dvorak literally only has 2 seasons with a sub 40 pts pace

Terravainen don’t play a lot more on the pp

If Mangiapane is worth 6m then how mich will Monahan make? 10m?
20 avr. à 11 h 43
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,644
Mentions "j'aime": 4,598
Avs decline in a heartbeat. Frankie already has effectively retired. The Avs can't afford Markstrom and certainly aren't giving up those pieces for him.
LimeyBarsteward a aimé ceci.
20 avr. à 12 h 6
#12
Démarrer sujet
KippertheGoat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 487
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Nothing in this comment made a single lick of sense.
1. Savard at 3.5M and a 3rd is hardly considered positive value
2. Mangiapane makes less than 6M
3. Mangiapane is being 25% retained in that proposal which would be cap hit of 4.35M
4. Calling Mangiapane a 3rd liner is quite ignorant, he's a middle 6er with a strong 2-way game and would still make ~6M on the open market, just like Terravainen will get this summer. He would also be 4th in even strength scoring on the Habs this season only behind their 1st line.


I really appreciate the positive comments from you. Ledge.
20 avr. à 12 h 44
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,591
Mentions "j'aime": 3,218
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Savard is worth 3m easily lol. Without retention he gets at least a third

Dvorak literally only has 2 seasons with a sub 40 pts pace

Terravainen don’t play a lot more on the pp

If Mangiapane is worth 6m then how mich will Monahan make? 10m?


Homer!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage