SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

My expectations

Créé par: fixitf11
Équipe: 2024-25 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 19 avr. 2024
Publié: 19 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
55 875 000 $
33 000 000 $
31 875 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Raddysh, Taylor [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (NYR)
CHI
  1. Smith, Reilly (2 500 000 $ retained)
2.
PIT
  1. Schmid, Akira [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (WPG)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de WPG
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2026
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $82 929 342 $0 $0 $4 770 658 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
C
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
RFA
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
RFA
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
795 000 $795 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
805 833 $805 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
918 333 $918 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
886 667 $886 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 avr. à 17 h 26
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,195
Mentions "j'aime": 1,853
You want Raddysh, he will likely be available in free agency. Hawks are not paying for Reilly. The question is: how much would they need to get paid to take him.
Garak, SociallyHawkward, Hawksguy81 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 17 h 30
#2
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,528
Mentions "j'aime": 410
1. you didn't sign Broz.
2. what's the point of signing Olofsson. They don't need that. They are better off playing any number of prospects there.
3. the penguins need a capable 3rd pairing. POJ is useless. He's not a good defenseman and he can't PK. He needs to go so we can at least get a PK 3rd pairing.
19 avr. à 17 h 42
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 2,318
Mentions "j'aime": 1,188
A.) We are not paying DeBrusk $5.875 million for 5 years. He hasn’t earned that kind of aav.

B.) We are not running with 2, at BEST, backup goalies. In what world does that seem like a good idea? If Jarry is moved then Ned surely stays. Blomqvist is growing more and more ready for an NHL backup role as well. He had a great year in WBS. We won’t come close to playoffs if we are running with your above tandem.

C.) Viktor Olofsson is not the kind of player that this team needs anywhere near their roster. Hard hard hard pass. I doubt any team that is trying to compete would give him more than a 1 year deal at this point anyways. That is if they even find him remotely useful.

D.) POJ is a third pair defenseman. Graves needs to play like the 2nd pair defenseman that we signed him to be. It’s not uncommon that guys get a too comfortable for the first year after signing a UFA ticket. Hopefully he will play up to the standard this coming season.
19 avr. à 17 h 56
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,696
Mentions "j'aime": 5,909
Hawks aren't paying for Smith and retention means nothing to them
Garak, Hawksguy81 et PaulKorea a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 18 h 17
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,125
Mentions "j'aime": 10,998
Quoting: YeahRighttt
You want Raddysh, he will likely be available in free agency. Hawks are not paying for Reilly. The question is: how much would they need to get paid to take him.


I get it. But, imagine what a hard working 2-way 40 point rental retained even further at a $1.25M cap hit could fetch at next years deadline. I'm not necessarily saying CHI shouldn't be asking for that 4th to be going the other way, but man... if he were to have a decent and healthy season in CHI, that could possibly mean more valuable assets for the rebuild. I don't hate it.

BUT, I also don't get what exactly is in it for PIT if they aren't moving the full cap hit. They are gonna need every bit of cap space they can get, if they want to make REAL additions and ice a contender next year. If not, what is the point of moving anyone? This might just be my opinion, but PIT is either trying to contend or they aren't, they'll need to pick a lane and go all in. Otherwise they are just doing things for the optics and PR.
Maple, LivingAnew et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 19 h 25
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,195
Mentions "j'aime": 1,853
Quoting: Garak
I get it. But, imagine what a hard working 2-way 40 point rental retained even further at a $1.25M cap hit could fetch at next years deadline. I'm not necessarily saying CHI shouldn't be asking for that 4th to be going the other way, but man... if he were to have a decent and healthy season in CHI, that could possibly mean more valuable assets for the rebuild. I don't hate it.

BUT, I also don't get what exactly is in it for PIT if they aren't moving the full cap hit. They are gonna need every bit of cap space they can get, if they want to make REAL additions and ice a contender next year. If not, what is the point of moving anyone? This might just be my opinion, but PIT is either trying to contend or they aren't, they'll need to pick a lane and go all in. Otherwise they are just doing things for the optics and PR.


I hear you & I’m not saying it is completely out of the realm of possibilities. However the rationale of grab this guy & flip him later for more is used to excess on this site . Ultimately for it to work you have to give the player enough ice time to be able to hit the desired levels. This limits the amount of ice time the team has to devote to the delopment of younger players. Hoarding picks is not a bad idea but it is important to develop the players you draft. Since Davidson didn’t really flip anyone this year, I don’t like the odds of him doing so next year. Hawks don’t need any help in the bottom 6. It is arguable if the need help in the middle 6 or not. They definitely need a lot of help in the top 6. I don’t see Reilly has the best option to help in the top 6, but that’s just my opinion.
Garak a aimé ceci.
19 avr. à 20 h 18
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,125
Mentions "j'aime": 10,998
Quoting: YeahRighttt
I hear you & I’m not saying it is completely out of the realm of possibilities. However the rationale of grab this guy & flip him later for more is used to excess on this site . Ultimately for it to work you have to give the player enough ice time to be able to hit the desired levels. This limits the amount of ice time the team has to devote to the delopment of younger players. Hoarding picks is not a bad idea but it is important to develop the players you draft. Since Davidson didn’t really flip anyone this year, I don’t like the odds of him doing so next year. Hawks don’t need any help in the bottom 6. It is arguable if the need help in the middle 6 or not. They definitely need a lot of help in the top 6. I don’t see Reilly has the best option to help in the top 6, but that’s just my opinion.


For sure. I agree with all of that. I just think there are certain players where it isn't so cut and dry, and those are the kind of guys KD seems to be willing to give a shot.
YeahRighttt a aimé ceci.
22 avr. à 0 h 6
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,165
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Your not getting much for Jarry and that cap hit and term.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage