SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Season

Créé par: ange99
Équipe: 2024-25 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 24 mars 2024
Publié: 28 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
34 000 000 $
1900 000 $
13 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
WPG
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
2.
BUF
  1. Sturm, Nico
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2026 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
Buyout of Skinner (He will waive NMC since its understood he would get bought out)
SJS
  1. Jokiharju, Henri
  2. Rosén, Isak
  3. Skinner, Jeff
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
3.
BUF
  1. Jenner, Boone
Détails additionnels:
I know that CBJ fans are going to say (He's not available). Just appease me so I can build this roster. What more would it take? Another 1st? Lets have some constructive criticism on what it would take to make it happen

(Would do the same deal for Sam Bennett but I don't think he would sign with us)
CBJ
  1. Östlund, Noah
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (BUF)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
2025
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de MIN
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NSH
Logo de WSH
2026
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $77 756 070 $0 $2 500 000 $9 743 930 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 100 000 $7 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 285 714 $4 285 714 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
G
RFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 mars à 17 h 15
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,251
Mentions "j'aime": 437
If any Bluejacket fans rejecting this they might be mentally ill. A lottery pick this year, a former lottery pick, and a second rounder for Jenner is an absolute fleece by CBJ
28 mars à 17 h 16
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,684
Sharks say yes only if Skinner agrees to not getting bought out and plays, he is overpaid but a good top 6 and his deal would be up when Smith and Celebrini (please hockey gods don’t screw us) are coming off their ELC’s
DFinn91 a aimé ceci.
28 mars à 17 h 18
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 554
Mentions "j'aime": 203
Sharks accept.
28 mars à 17 h 35
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,923
Mentions "j'aime": 14,597
Love to give away players while having 10 million in cap space
28 mars à 17 h 44
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 5,715
Mentions "j'aime": 4,783
Wouldn't do 2 or 3. I like Jenner but not for that.
28 mars à 17 h 48
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 153
Mentions "j'aime": 117
Listen, I'm theoretically not against the idea of moving Jenner if the Blue Jackets get a really good return for him but his value to Columbus is high for the same reason his value would be high for Buffalo. Buffalo and Columbus are in the same position, they've acquired loads of talent. Now they need to construct a roster.

If Buffalo gave Columbus that, Columbus would probably look to use it to get a Jenner plus more. Who would that be? If that Buffalo offer could help Columbus land a player like Brady Tkachuk or Robert Thomas, I'd be all for it. But I think Buffalo would be better off just getting a Tkachuk or Thomas player themselves in that situation.
BUFF36, CaseyFlyman et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
28 mars à 18 h 17
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,283
Mentions "j'aime": 6,255
I think if that's the cost for Jenner, I'd rather adams try to draft his own- who in this draft is closest to Jenners skill set?- Cayden linstrom?
AntiAnalytics et BUFF36 a aimé ceci.
28 mars à 18 h 49
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,728
Mentions "j'aime": 3,785
The Iafallo trade makes sense

And i like the Sturm idea, but paying all that to get rid of Skinner is pretty dumb- especially when we have plenty of Cap space

CBj fans keep saying they aren’t trading Jenner,
and that’s an overpay anyways for him
28 mars à 20 h 23
#9
Bandwagon fairweathe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,673
Mentions "j'aime": 3,281
For skinner why not package for disgruntled, shine him up with this years first, and go get zegras, or somebody with a buylow and some years to make good, abundance of youth and recent elcs time for a home run gamble.
28 mars à 21 h 10
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,111
Mentions "j'aime": 1,789
That's more than enough for Jenner the player, and I personally would be for moving him (a total leadership change could do the room some good).

I think the reason he's considered untouchable is because he's essentially the most important player in the organization's history, and the captain. The organization is set on keeping him, logic be damned. That's the crux of the "he's not available" discussion, he's so internally valuable it would take a GM-gets-fired move for him to actually get moved.

Jenner the player? He's a good goal-scoring 2C on a great deal. If he weren't "Jenner", he'd cost a 1st and a good forward prospect, maybe a mid-rounder depending on the prospect coming back. If the new GM decided to move him, the 1st plus Ostlund I'd think would be enough.
CertifiedAverage et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
29 mars à 0 h 45
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 1,122
Mentions "j'aime": 630
A top 10 pick & great prospect for Boone Jenner. Adams should be fired on the spot for that.
29 mars à 8 h 15
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2024
Messages: 7
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Sharks say yes only if Skinner agrees to not getting bought out and plays, he is overpaid but a good top 6 and his deal would be up when Smith and Celebrini (please hockey gods don’t screw us) are coming off their ELC’s


Sharks would be literally **** to make this move. Completely stupid beyond reason. Luckily Grier is ten times smarter than this hypocrite comment.
29 mars à 10 h 24
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,228
Mentions "j'aime": 657
Since when does a 3rd line center get you all that...and don't say because of unloading the Skinner contract bc Skinner (NMC) just says frank no and that's the bottom line
29 mars à 11 h 26
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,684
Quoting: Custer
Sharks would be literally **** to make this move. Completely stupid beyond reason. Luckily Grier is ten times smarter than this hypocrite comment.

What the hell is your problem? Skinner is still a 25 goal 40 to 50 point player something we don’t really have he’d be a good mentor for some of the younger guys and his deal is up exactly when we would have to start paying our top guys his contract would be pretty much Like a placeholder for a Will Smith and a Celebrini. I see absolutely nothing wrong with the idea of getting a guy like Skinner, and a second rather than paying a free agent for seven years! Then again, people who actually have some logic and understanding of how the cap works and how teambuilding goes would know that so I’m not gonna hold it against you
29 mars à 18 h 19
#15
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,779
Mentions "j'aime": 3,272
Quote:
Just appease me so I can build this roster.

No. You already know the answer.
Quote:
What more would it take? Another 1st?

A replacement Jenner. Not another physical #2C claimed to have leadership capabilities - another career-long member of this team, committed to this market, signed voluntarily at a hometown discount to a sweetheart deal, at a position we desperately need more of, working as a mentor of the type we desperately need more of, playing in every situation competently without an ounce of complaint, and so consistent at all of the above that our infamously hands-off ownership would (and per rumors may actually have) veto a trade. He's Simply Not Available.

Maybe you can overcome the ownership veto if you offer a franchise player, but then that'd likely get vetoed by your guys. It's just not worth asking.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage