SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

San Jose Remake

Créé par: Avenger2011430
Équipe: 2023-24 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 24 mars 2024
Publié: 24 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (CHI)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (CHI)
2.
CGY
  1. MacDonald, Jacob
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
  4. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
  5. Choix de 7e ronde en 2026 (SJS)
3.
4.
5.
VGK
  1. Blackwood, Mackenzie
  2. Todd, Nathan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Future considerations
6.
WSH
    Future Considerations
    7.
    SJS
    1. Tarasenko, Vladimir
    2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
    FLA
      Future Considerations
      8.
      SJS
      1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CBJ)
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Enfoui
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2024
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de TBL
      Logo de VGK
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de FLA
      Logo de SJS
      2025
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de WPG
      Logo de SJS
      2026
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2683 500 000 $120 018 335 $25 000 $1 142 500 $-36 518 335 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
      AG, AD
      NMC
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
      C, AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      AD, AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      AG, AD, C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Panthers de la Floride
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      AD
      NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
      2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
      AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      AG
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      916 667 $916 667 $
      C, AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
      AD, C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      800 000 $800 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
      6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
      DG
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
      5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
      DG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
      6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
      G
      NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Capitals de Washington
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
      DG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      910 000 $910 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
      G
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 3
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 3

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      24 mars à 12 h 50
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2024
      Messages: 47
      Mentions "j'aime": 7
      who do you think San Jose should acquire for a defense man.
      24 mars à 12 h 52
      #2
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2017
      Messages: 27,789
      Mentions "j'aime": 14,519
      You are gonna find that people don't much care for this type of AGM
      brady_t12 et CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
      24 mars à 13 h 26
      #3
      mostly harmless
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2016
      Messages: 6,675
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,160
      Modifié 24 mars à 13 h 33
      Um. You literally don't have the assets to get a return like that from the Jackets. Like, there is literally nothing San Jose has or can offer that would make that viable. You could add Will Smith and William Eklund and still be told "no".

      EDIT: In case the OP ninja-edits, this is what this post is in response to:
      jfZQArL.png
      brady_t12 et CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
      24 mars à 13 h 37
      #4
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2024
      Messages: 47
      Mentions "j'aime": 7
      good point
      24 mars à 14 h 39
      #5
      Xan
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2021
      Messages: 23
      Mentions "j'aime": 4
      Flames say yes so fast it makes your head spin. They wouldn't let you hang up the phone, you have to submit it to central trade registry immediately, no takesy backsey!
      24 mars à 14 h 47
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 19,029
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
      The Hawks don't even respond
      JK74 et PaulKorea a aimé ceci.
      24 mars à 14 h 51
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2022
      Messages: 1,502
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,120
      There's something seriously wrong with you buddy. Either you're trolling or delusional. Either way you need help!
      PaulKorea a aimé ceci.
      24 mars à 15 h 15
      #8
      MisstheWhalers
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2019
      Messages: 23,654
      Mentions "j'aime": 12,372
      They can have Hellebuyck and Appleton but not those other Jets.
      24 mars à 15 h 17
      #9
      mostly harmless
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2016
      Messages: 6,675
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,160
      As anticipated, the Jackets trade has been edited:

      wIaOc4r.png

      It's technically an improvement in that we've moved on from "literally impossible" to a mere "that's not good enough". The Jackets do not need depth wingers, and even if we did that package isn't good enough for a top-5 pick.
      24 mars à 15 h 51
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2017
      Messages: 317
      Mentions "j'aime": 180
      Quoting: Viqsi
      Um. You literally don't have the assets to get a return like that from the Jackets. Like, there is literally nothing San Jose has or can offer that would make that viable. You could add Will Smith and William Eklund and still be told "no".


      Quoting: Viqsi
      As anticipated, the Jackets trade has been edited:


      It's technically an improvement in that we've moved on from "literally impossible" to a mere "that's not good enough". The Jackets do not need depth wingers, and even if we did that package isn't good enough for a top-5 pick.


      The inclusion of Barabanov makes zero impact on the trade as well. He's a pending UFA and I don't think after this year he's re-signing with any team near the bottom of the standings unless he can't get any other offers (which could reasonably happen considering his play this year, but it's unlikely he'll do it without testing free agency to see what's out there).

      In addition to that, the Chicago trade is laughable. Too lazy to screenshot but it's pending UFA fringe 4th line/AHLer Justin Bailey, pending UFA fringe 4C/AHLer Ryan Carpenter, pending UFA who couldn't get NHL games on an injured/terrible Sharks squad Oskar Lindblom, and pending RFA who is starting to play decently but has limited value Filip Zadina for Chicago's 2024 and 2025 1st and 2nd.

      I honestly can't take any of these trades seriously.

      Why is Florida paying to dump a pending free agent?

      Why is Washington giving away Carlson for free?

      Morrissey was top 5 in Norris voting last year and based on the stats he's been having another good year (I haven't watched him outside of games against the Sharks this year) and Namestnikov's been good for them this year too, so why are they giving them up for a likely late 1st, a guy who hasn't done great after being traded for a 2026 5th and a prospect who was probably included for contract numbers, and a guy who was available on waivers this year (though he's been decent for the Sharks on the rare occasions he's been healthy)?

      The other Jets trade isn't much better...a pending UFA goalie who was picked up for a 7th, a good AHLer in Scott Sabourin who isn't young enough to be more than the veteran guy down there who might occasionally be rewarded with a game or 2 at the NHL level, a pending RFA center who passed through waivers and wasn't able to stick on a Sharks team with 3 of its top 4 centers injured, a former 31st OA pick who was considered a reach when taken and is getting very close to being considered a bust (not quite there yet, still some interest in him hence Milwaukee wanting him to be loaned for the playoff push), and a 1st in 3 years for one of the better goalies in the league, Ehlers, and Appleton both of whom are good players (I'm getting lazy so I'm going to stop going through this).
      JK74 a aimé ceci.
      24 mars à 20 h 25
      #11
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2022
      Messages: 7,373
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,169
      Calgary would probably have to accept that but it won't happen because there's no way Chicago trades their 2024 and 2025 1sts to SJ in the first place.
      JK74 a aimé ceci.
      24 mars à 23 h 4
      #12
      RecycleShark
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2023
      Messages: 932
      Mentions "j'aime": 261
      This all seems totally reasonable. Especially the Chicago trade. I wouldn't trade Addison for Morrissey, though, Addison has more offensive upside. Good idea to trade for Martinez before he hits free agency.
      25 mars à 10 h 6
      #13
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2024
      Messages: 47
      Mentions "j'aime": 7
      Quoting: RecycleShark
      This all seems totally reasonable. Especially the Chicago trade. I wouldn't trade Addison for Morrissey, though, Addison has more offensive upside. Good idea to trade for Martinez before he hits free agency.


      we do have good offense from the players that we got from Calgary.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage