SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rumoured BLOCKBUSTER that got nixed

Créé par: HShockey
Équipe: 2023-24 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 17 mars 2024
Publié: 17 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
BOS
  1. Dubois, Pierre-Luc
  2. Talbot, Cam
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (LAK)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2025
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2026
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $81 465 001 $0 $4 495 000 $2 034 999 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance1 550 000 $$2M)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
875 000 $875 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
875 000 $875 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 mars à 16 h 48
#1
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,547
Mentions "j'aime": 4,488
Nothing would’ve made me more happy than for Ryan Johansen 2.0, the king (NPI) of trade demands. being traded for a third time in four seasons to his fourth team.
17 mars à 16 h 51
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,117
Mentions "j'aime": 1,397
No way
17 mars à 17 h 22
#3
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,760
Mentions "j'aime": 3,508
Why would Boston have even considered that? Taking on 7 extra years of an 8.5mil cap dump, and not even getting anything to incentivize it? Yikes, that would have been a fireable offense.
17 mars à 17 h 22
#4
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,797
Mentions "j'aime": 12,452
Would've been a crazy fukkin trade had it happened, meltdowns galore!
17 mars à 17 h 25
#5
Tank it baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 6,921
Mentions "j'aime": 4,670
Man PLD would be crucified in Boston. LOL
17 mars à 17 h 39
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,711
Mentions "j'aime": 6,215
Cam Talbot has a full NTC and would not have accepted a trade to a team where he would have been a backup.
17 mars à 18 h 18
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 199
Mentions "j'aime": 82
Definitely wasn't rumored at all. Multiple people have said LA and Boston were working an Ullmark deal after he said no to another deal but ran out of time. But PLD wasn't apart of the deal. It's believed that Blake was calling teams to gauge their interest in PLD quietly and someone leaked it but he wasn't apart of any deals.
17 mars à 18 h 22
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 4,102
Mentions "j'aime": 1,286
Modifié 17 mars à 18 h 32
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Cam Talbot has a full NTC and would not have accepted a trade to a team where he would have been a backup.


Substitute Rittich if that’s the case. Talbott is a backup either way. Would have also required another swap. Grz for England to make the cap work.

Either way, it didn’t happen. Maybe they revisit. Maybe they don’t. I think Boston is going to sign Lindholm and trade Ullmark for a pick.

Quoting: Socal_King
Definitely wasn't rumored at all. Multiple people have said LA and Boston were working an Ullmark deal after he said no to another deal but ran out of time. But PLD wasn't apart of the deal. It's believed that Blake was calling teams to gauge their interest in PLD quietly and someone leaked it but he wasn't apart of any deals.


Both teams would have needed to get rid of major players if they were to formally to do an Ullmark deal? If it was LA, who was the cap player going back to Boston?

I’d think that Sweeney would have asked Ullmark if he was open to a trade to LA before spending time on a deal. That’s the one thing that doesn’t make much sense in these rumors.

I guess there is a possibility of Arvidssen and a first round pick for Ullmark. Dont see it.
17 mars à 18 h 25
#9
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,126
Mentions "j'aime": 1,395
Quoting: Socal_King
Definitely wasn't rumored at all. Multiple people have said LA and Boston were working an Ullmark deal after he said no to another deal but ran out of time. But PLD wasn't apart of the deal. It's believed that Blake was calling teams to gauge their interest in PLD quietly and someone leaked it but he wasn't apart of any deals.


I didn't hear it ran out of time at all. My understanding from Seravelli and Friedman is that Ullmark blocked LAK from his NTC and refused to waive. I've heard from multiple BOS fans that Ullmark has most west coast teams on his NTC list.
17 mars à 18 h 46
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 4,102
Mentions "j'aime": 1,286
Quoting: evelutions2
Why would Boston have even considered that? Taking on 7 extra years of an 8.5mil cap dump, and not even getting anything to incentivize it? Yikes, that would have been a fireable offense.


He’s not a complete cap dump. He’s probably overpaid by 1.5m AAV if you use Troy Terry as a comp. $2M if you use Tippett or Hagel

I don’t see a distinct difference between him and Jake DeBrusk, which is why I question it … but there is some logic to it if you believe PLD can be a top 6 center. If I’m Boston, I rather sign JDB and trade Ullmark for a pick.
17 mars à 19 h 12
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 199
Mentions "j'aime": 82
Quoting: jfkst1
I didn't hear it ran out of time at all. My understanding from Seravelli and Friedman is that Ullmark blocked LAK from his NTC and refused to waive. I've heard from multiple BOS fans that Ullmark has most west coast teams on his NTC list.


A couple of Kings writers that have ties to the team came out and said LA wasn't the team Ullmark nixed the deal to. My guess is that he would kill a deal to LA too. But here in LA the rumors were Blake was looking into Ullmark after he killed a deal but Blake didn't want to move anyone off LA's roster and had no cap space with Arvidsson soon to come off of LTIR
17 mars à 19 h 33
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 4,102
Mentions "j'aime": 1,286
Quoting: Socal_King
A couple of Kings writers that have ties to the team came out and said LA wasn't the team Ullmark nixed the deal to. My guess is that he would kill a deal to LA too. But here in LA the rumors were Blake was looking into Ullmark after he killed a deal but Blake didn't want to move anyone off LA's roster and had no cap space with Arvidsson soon to come off of LTIR


Local writers are often used for damage control. There is NO deal with Boston without major pieces going out. Both sides are cap constrained. If Blake had discussions about Ullmark, that would have been known and this just sounds like after the fact spin control.

I am curious about how deep the conversations would have been and I think LA is stuck between these decisions in the offseason

Letting go of Roy and signing Byfield to a long term contract

Vs

Singing Byfield to a bridge contract and signing Roy.

Trading PLD for no more than $5m in salaries coming back likely makes that decision go away. They could sign Roy and Byfield to a long term contract
17 mars à 22 h 10
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,285
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: Socal_King
Definitely wasn't rumored at all. Multiple people have said LA and Boston were working an Ullmark deal after he said no to another deal but ran out of time. But PLD wasn't apart of the deal. It's believed that Blake was calling teams to gauge their interest in PLD quietly and someone leaked it but he wasn't apart of any deals.


There were rumours Boston poked around at Dubois. They did need a C real bad and Dubois and the only way it would make sense for both parties is if Boston acquired a C (could've been Danualt involved, who knows) and Kings got a goalie. Because Dubois was rumoured to Boston, my bet is that the framework was something like this. You could be right though, I just don't see who else LA would move that Boston would like right now who's a centre besides PLD
17 mars à 22 h 13
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,285
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: SharkTank
Man PLD would be crucified in Boston. LOL


I mean, I feel like he could flourish at the same time. It's the most Boston thing, and playing with potentially Marchand and Pastrnak he'd probably find his stride
17 mars à 22 h 40
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 321
Mentions "j'aime": 125
Bruins were flipping PLD for Laine
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage