SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sign Elias Lindholm

Créé par: Celtics21
Équipe: 2024-25 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 11 mars 2024
Publié: 11 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 000 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
78 000 000 $
22 500 000 $
14 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
1925 000 $
Transactions
BOS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de NJD
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $86 179 167 $50 000 $542 500 $1 320 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
RFA
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
G
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 mars à 17 h 23
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,550
Mentions "j'aime": 22,691
Admitting there are many centres as UFA, but 30 year 50 point Lindholm isn't worth of that $$$$ and especially that term.
11 mars à 17 h 34
#2
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,895
Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
Send back my glorious king Jesper Boqvist and you have a deal
11 mars à 17 h 36
#3
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2022
Messages: 4,139
Mentions "j'aime": 2,289
Personally I would: Not give more than 2.5 mill to that LD spot, avoid giving that much to Lindholm, and hopefully find a good top 6 center for 6.5 mill, not sign Ned, and keep Ullmark. Ullmark is key for Boston, even with Swayman.
11 mars à 17 h 36
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,765
Mentions "j'aime": 1,172
Modifié 11 mars à 17 h 48
Quoting: palhal
Admitting there are many centres as UFA, but 30 year 50 point Lindholm isn't worth of that $$$$ and especially that term.


Ideally it would be 6 years. He’ll be 29 through December 2nd.

Reality is if you are using free agency to acquire a player, you likely overpay in either term or AAV. I’m using the Scheifele contract as the baseline. Lindholm is 1.5 years younger coming than Scheifele, but is coming off a down year. Maybe he goes for 7.5.

Quoting: Caufield
Personally I would: Not give more than 2.5 mill to that LD spot, avoid giving that much to Lindholm, and hopefully find a good top 6 center for 6.5 mill, not sign Ned, and keep Ullmark. Ullmark is key for Boston, even with Swayman.


Whom are you thinking of? I can see diversifying that payment between a Left D and Forward, but I am thinking of paying a premium for the LD for less term because we need to allocate some of the funds to Frederic after next year
11 mars à 17 h 38
#5
MK458
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,110
Mentions "j'aime": 931
Maybe last season Lindholm could've asked for 8 million, but after this year I imagine his price has decreased quite a bit. I'm thinking 7 x 6.75 or 7 million
11 mars à 17 h 41
#6
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,895
Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
Quoting: mk458
Maybe last season Lindholm could've asked for 8 million, but after this year I imagine his price has decreased quite a bit. I'm thinking 7 x 6.75 or 7 million


Imagine if he took the 9 mill x 8 years Conroy was offering
mk458 a aimé ceci.
11 mars à 17 h 49
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,580
Mentions "j'aime": 5,455
Quoting: Celtics21
Ideally it would be 6 years. He’ll be 29 through December 2nd.

Reality is if you are using free agency to acquire a player, you likely overpay in either term or AAV. I’m using the Scheifele contract as the baseline. Lindholm is 1.5 years younger coming than Scheifele, but is coming off a down year.


if you're going to overpay, do it for a high-end player (1st liner/pair D), not a 2C that could soon become a 3C. Martinez has regressed this year and will be 37yo. Same for Maroon. I would avoid the old players. Nedeljkovic hasn't been anything special, rather stick with Bussi/Dipietro or acquire a more consistent backup.
11 mars à 17 h 50
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,765
Mentions "j'aime": 1,172
Modifié 11 mars à 18 h 5
Quoting: bhavikp27
if you're going to overpay, do it for a high-end player (1st liner/pair D), not a 2C that could soon become a 3C. Martinez has regressed this year and will be 37yo. Same for Maroon. I would avoid the old players. Nedeljkovic hasn't been anything special, rather stick with Bussi/Dipietro or acquire a more consistent backup.


Great conceptually, Who? Look at free agency and tell me the name, because I don’t think this center exists. You could do a short term contract maybe and see how it goes. I fully acknowledge $8m over 7 years is an overpay, but even in the worst case scenario here … we’re in a position to add a very good player and a solid one on top of that,

Maybe it’s Guentzel instead of Lindholm? Maybe sign JDB or Bertuzzi and bring in a better defenseman like Skjei?

Martinez was a 1 year flyer. Haven’t watched much Vegas this year, but just thinking for a short term player who provides stability while Lohrei grows into the fourth role. Trying to allocate money for Frederic in 2025. Any d you would recommend here?
11 mars à 18 h 12
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,181
Mentions "j'aime": 18,356
What does Chandler Stephenson make on his next deal?

Or what does Granlund go for?
11 mars à 18 h 31
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,580
Mentions "j'aime": 5,455
Quoting: Celtics21
Great conceptually, Who? Look at free agency and tell me the name, because I don’t think this center exists. You could do a short term contract maybe and see how it goes. I fully acknowledge $8m over 7 years is an overpay, but even in the worst case scenario here … we’re in a position to add a very good player and a solid one on top of that,

Maybe it’s Guentzel instead of Lindholm? Maybe sign JDB or Bertuzzi and bring in a better defenseman like Skjei?

Martinez was a 1 year flyer. Haven’t watched much Vegas this year, but just thinking for a short term player who provides stability while Lohrei grows into the fourth role. Trying to allocate money for Frederic in 2025. Any d you would recommend here?


There's no 1C available, that's the reality. Scheifele re-signed last year, Pettersson weeks ago, Hertl just got traded. Even a winger like Nylander. Build a solid 2nd line, have two top wingers on the 1st who carries a 2C in the 1C role is one option and even then, it's easier said than done.

Reinhart should be the best forward available. He's 29yo, but he's only had few seasons as a top line player and will be coming of a 50-goal, 90-pts season.
If he isn't re-signed, Guentzel is another one, 30yo. Duchene maybe although he's older and I would be surprised if he takes another discount.

I rather not give a long-term contract that is unlikely to age well and stick with a middle-six C on short-term contracts like they're doing right now. If there's someone I believe will be worth his contract for most of its duration, I'd do it. Lindholm isn't a 1st liner and I would definitely not go 8x8, 7x7 either and even 6x6, I'm worried.


Best hope for the Bruins is one of the top6 F free agents is willing to sign a 1-3 year contract although they will have to overpay. Then, most importantly, the player need to keep his level of play. It is why this whole thing of trying to contend for the Cup post-Bergeron is questionable. What even is the window? Sure feels like they will just end up lacking the top/elite forward talent if Pastrnak is the only forward at that level. Hopefully I'm wrong.
11 mars à 18 h 34
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,765
Mentions "j'aime": 1,172
Quoting: NHLfan10506
What does Chandler Stephenson make on his next deal?

Or what does Granlund go for?


Granlund might be the worst “good” center in the league in terms of fit to system

Stephenson probably doesn’t make as much as he would have walking into the year. My guess is we would be going after a wing with premium money if we don’t allocate to Lindholm.
dgibb10 a aimé ceci.
11 mars à 18 h 48
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,765
Mentions "j'aime": 1,172
Quoting: bhavikp27
Best hope for the Bruins is one of the top6 F free agents is willing to sign a 1-3 year contract although they will have to overpay. Then, most importantly, the player need to keep his level of play. It is why this whole thing of trying to contend for the Cup post-Bergeron is questionable. What even is the window? Sure feels like they will just end up lacking the top/elite forward talent if Pastrnak is the only forward at that level. Hopefully I'm wrong.


I seriously doubt you are getting a top 6 forward to sign a 3 year contract. It’s a fantasy that doesn’t really exist. I’d love an optimal contract, but those generally are tied to RFA’s you sign early. Swayman last year would have been an interesting option.

I do believe Boston is going to bring in two talents this offseason (one if they resign DeBrusk).
11 mars à 19 h 3
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 488
Mentions "j'aime": 327
Quoting: dgibb10
Send back my glorious king Jesper Boqvist and you have a deal


A couple months ago I had no problem losing him, but I can see now why you are such a fan, he's been playing really well
dgibb10 a aimé ceci.
11 mars à 19 h 4
#14
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,895
Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
Quoting: SJSF
A couple months ago I had no problem losing him, but I can see now why you are such a fan, he's been playing really well


No idea why we let him go and replaced him with garbage Tierney.
SJSF a aimé ceci.
11 mars à 19 h 47
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,795
Mentions "j'aime": 8,839
Give Bussi the backup job. Much cheaper.

Take the $ on AMart and Ned and get Skjei instead.
Celtics21 a aimé ceci.
11 mars à 20 h 38
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,765
Mentions "j'aime": 1,172
Quoting: Gofnut999
Give Bussi the backup job. Much cheaper.

Take the $ on AMart and Ned and get Skjei instead.


I was thinking we’d want to not sign a player to a multi year contract here at that dollar figure, but I’d rather have Skjei over AMadt/Ned any day,

Bussi or DiPietro probably deserve a shot
11 mars à 20 h 50
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,765
Mentions "j'aime": 1,172
Quoting: dgibb10
No idea why we let him go and replaced him with garbage Tierney.


It happens. It made no sense at the time especially a player who was an RFA. He’s part of the only line playing worth a damn right now in this crappy game.

Atleast I am going to the Celtic game tonight
12 mars à 11 h 41
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,795
Mentions "j'aime": 8,839
Quoting: Celtics21
I was thinking we’d want to not sign a player to a multi year contract here at that dollar figure, but I’d rather have Skjei over AMadt/Ned any day,

Bussi or DiPietro probably deserve a shot


Nieither Busdi nor DiPietro will be waiver exempt next year either. Getting them through waivers might be difficult.
12 mars à 12 h 33
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,765
Mentions "j'aime": 1,172
Quoting: Gofnut999
Nieither Busdi nor DiPietro will be waiver exempt next year either. Getting them through waivers might be difficult.


Agree to an extent. Neither Bussi or DiPietro is a top shelf G in the AHL this year (with DiPietro being the better of the two), but both have solid talent.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage