SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Best destinations and trades for Ullmark in my opnion

Créé par: dons_weeney
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 9 mars 2024
Publié: 9 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
These returns are a total guess, and they are what I would want, not what I think is going to actually happen. If a trade is not fair in value, I'd be more than happy to ship out prospects, picks, and or roster players with it depending on the value. Think of these trades as starting points to negotiate from. If you comment criticizing these trades, please include your side of the negotiation so I can understand the value better, instead of just saying "x team declines" etc. etc. Keep in mind the destinations are the main thing I'm looking at, not the actual trade value, those are more just for fun.

Which team makes the most sense in your opinion? What else needs to be added to the trade for it to make more sense for both sides?

PS - the west coast teams are just for fun. Ullmark won't go out west, he wants to stay in the east for easy travel for his family in Sweden.
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
CAR
    Ullmark
    2.
    BUF
      Ullmark
      3.
      BOS
      1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
      COL
        Ullmark
        4.
        BOS
        1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (DET)
        DET
          Ullmark
          5.
          BOS
          1. Holloway, Dylan
          2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
          EDM
            Ullmark
            6.
            7.
            BOS
            1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
            NJD
              Ullmark
              8.
              OTT
                Ullmark
                9.
                BOS
                1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
                PHI
                  Ullmark
                  10.
                  SEA
                  1. Merkulov, Georgi
                  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
                  Détails additionnels:
                  Ullmark
                  11.
                  BOS
                  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
                  TOR
                    Ullmark
                    12.
                    BOS
                    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (WSH)
                    WSH
                      Ullmark
                      Rachats de contrats
                      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
                      2024
                      Logo de CAR
                      Logo de COL
                      Logo de FLA
                      Logo de TOR
                      Logo de DET
                      Logo de BOS
                      Logo de BOS
                      Logo de BOS
                      2025
                      Logo de NJD
                      Logo de WSH
                      Logo de BOS
                      Logo de EDM
                      Logo de BOS
                      Logo de BOS
                      Logo de BOS
                      2026
                      Logo de BOS
                      Logo de BOS
                      Logo de BOS
                      Logo de BOS
                      Logo de BOS
                      Logo de BOS
                      Logo de BOS
                      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
                      2783 500 000 $102 434 167 $4 500 000 $5 675 000 $-18 934 167 $
                      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
                      AG
                      M-NTC
                      UFA - 2
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
                      C, AD
                      M-NTC, NMC
                      UFA - 3
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
                      AD
                      NMC
                      UFA - 8
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
                      AG, AD
                      UFA - 2
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
                      C, AG
                      M-NTC
                      UFA - 4
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
                      AD, AG
                      UFA - 1
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
                      AG, AD
                      UFA - 1
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
                      C, AD
                      RFA - 2
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      775 000 $775 000 $
                      AD
                      UFA - 2
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      787 500 $787 500 $
                      AG, AD
                      RFA - 2
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      775 000 $775 000 $
                      C, AG
                      RFA - 1
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      775 000 $775 000 $
                      AG, AD
                      UFA - 1
                      Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
                      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
                      C, AG
                      RFA - 1
                      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
                      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
                      AG, C
                      RFA - 1
                      Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
                      8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
                      C
                      UFA - 8
                      Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
                      894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance1 550 000 $$2M)
                      C
                      RFA - 1
                      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
                      7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
                      C
                      UFA - 7
                      Logo de Kraken de Seattle
                      918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance3 062 500 $$3M)
                      C
                      RFA - 3
                      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
                      DG
                      UFA - 1
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
                      DD
                      UFA - 7
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
                      G
                      M-NTC
                      UFA - 2
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      925 000 $925 000 $
                      DG
                      RFA - 2
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
                      DD
                      M-NTC
                      UFA - 4
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
                      G
                      RFA - 1
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      775 000 $775 000 $
                      DG
                      UFA - 1
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
                      DD
                      UFA - 3
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
                      DD
                      UFA - 1
                      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
                      DG
                      NTC, NMC
                      UFA - 7
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
                      DG
                      M-NTC
                      UFA - 1
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
                      AG, AD
                      NMC
                      UFA - 1
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
                      C
                      RFA - 3
                      Logo de Bruins de Boston
                      800 000 $800 000 $
                      AG, AD
                      M-NTC
                      UFA - 1

                      Code d'intégration

                      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
                      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

                      Texte intégré

                      Cliquer pour surligner
                      9 mars à 12 h 17
                      #1
                      Benzino204
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: juin 2018
                      Messages: 1,649
                      Mentions "j'aime": 695
                      It's going to come down to who he waives for and who can provide Boston with a 1st, and a good centre prospect. The Bruins have their backup in the A and don't need one back in return, and obviously have thin prospect pool they should replenish
                      9 mars à 12 h 19
                      #2
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: janv. 2017
                      Messages: 19,832
                      Mentions "j'aime": 8,854
                      Philly makes the most sense. Wash, NJ maybe. Rest don’t make any sense really either for need, cap, or NTC.
                      dons_weeney a aimé ceci.
                      9 mars à 12 h 21
                      #3
                      mokumboi
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: avr. 2019
                      Messages: 29,330
                      Mentions "j'aime": 11,374
                      Whoa... no way Boston hands Buffalo such a nice gift. I agree that Philly and New Jersey make the most sense. Perhaps Detroit, as well.
                      9 mars à 12 h 21
                      #4
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: mars 2022
                      Messages: 669
                      Mentions "j'aime": 235
                      oilers/flyers/leafs need a reliable backup more than they need a starter

                      sabres need time for levi to develop & upl to solidofy himself

                      canes have no use for ullmark with kochetkov/andersen
                      9 mars à 12 h 21
                      #5
                      Démarrer sujet
                      Best armchair GM yet
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: juin 2023
                      Messages: 590
                      Mentions "j'aime": 139
                      Quoting: Benzino204
                      It's going to come down to who he waives for and who can provide Boston with a 1st, and a good centre prospect. The Bruins have their backup in the A and don't need one back in return, and obviously have thin prospect pool they should replenish


                      Agreed, although to get a first and a center prospect will probably require more going out with Ullmark. Which I'm ok with. Ultimately building the rest of the roster without a good center is just ignoring the elephant in the room imo.
                      9 mars à 12 h 22
                      #6
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: mai 2019
                      Messages: 40,426
                      Mentions "j'aime": 18,435
                      NJD or LAK…would be my guess.
                      9 mars à 12 h 23
                      #7
                      Démarrer sujet
                      Best armchair GM yet
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: juin 2023
                      Messages: 590
                      Mentions "j'aime": 139
                      Quoting: mokumboi
                      Whoa... no way Boston hands Buffalo such a nice gift. I agree that Philly and New Jersey make the most sense. Perhaps Detroit, as well.


                      Yeah Krebs is a bit overrated isn't he? The bruins just need to take fliers on center prospects. No point in wasting pasta/mcavoy prime without a legit c. I guess maybe add a second with it? Maybe a first? Like how can buffalo even fit and sign more high end talent lmao
                      mokumboi a aimé ceci.
                      9 mars à 12 h 24
                      #8
                      Démarrer sujet
                      Best armchair GM yet
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: juin 2023
                      Messages: 590
                      Mentions "j'aime": 139
                      Quoting: NHLfan10506
                      NJD or LAK…would be my guess.

                      Makes the most sense. Ullmark supposedly nixed trades to each of those teams. NJ was surprising though. I understand not wanting to be in LA
                      9 mars à 12 h 24
                      #9
                      Tank it baby
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: juill. 2020
                      Messages: 6,282
                      Mentions "j'aime": 4,288
                      Wings could buyout Husso and trade for Ullmark.

                      Don't know if Boston would trade him to a division rival?

                      Don't know if Ullmark would waive for Detroit?

                      They're buying time for Cossa/Augustine.
                      9 mars à 12 h 25
                      #10
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: mai 2019
                      Messages: 40,426
                      Mentions "j'aime": 18,435
                      Quoting: dons_weeney
                      Makes the most sense. Ullmark supposedly nixed trades to each of those teams. NJ was surprising though. I understand not wanting to be in LA


                      Ullmark nixed a trade to NJD? I had not seen that. I read that they spoke, but sounded like they didn’t get close to a trade offer.
                      9 mars à 12 h 26
                      #11
                      Démarrer sujet
                      Best armchair GM yet
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: juin 2023
                      Messages: 590
                      Mentions "j'aime": 139
                      Quoting: SharkTank
                      Wings could buyout Husso and trade for Ullmark.

                      Don't know if Boston would trade him to a division rival?

                      Don't know if Ullmark would waive for Detroit?

                      They're buying time for Cossa/Augustine.


                      Forgot about Augustine. Cossa doesn't seem to be trending in the right direction I've heard. I wouldn't worry too much about trading him to a division rival. More about the return. Play to win, don't play to not lose!
                      9 mars à 12 h 27
                      #12
                      Tank it baby
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: juill. 2020
                      Messages: 6,282
                      Mentions "j'aime": 4,288
                      Quoting: dons_weeney
                      Forgot about Augustine. Cossa doesn't seem to be trending in the right direction I've heard. I wouldn't worry too much about trading him to a division rival. More about the return. Play to win, don't play to not lose!


                      Actually Cossa is trending in the right direction.

                      I don't know who you're talking to? 🤭

                      He's having an outstanding season in Grand Rapids.
                      dons_weeney a aimé ceci.
                      9 mars à 12 h 28
                      #13
                      Démarrer sujet
                      Best armchair GM yet
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: juin 2023
                      Messages: 590
                      Mentions "j'aime": 139
                      Quoting: NHLfan10506
                      Ullmark nixed a trade to NJD? I had not seen that. I read that they spoke, but sounded like they didn’t get close to a trade offer.


                      Apparently it was Thursday night. Not positive though. From what I can tell there was a three way trade developing between LA/BOS/NJ. My best guess is Dubois to BOS, Ullmark to NJ, maybe Toffoli and a NJ goalie to LA? Something seems off with that though.
                      9 mars à 12 h 29
                      #14
                      mokumboi
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: avr. 2019
                      Messages: 29,330
                      Mentions "j'aime": 11,374
                      Quoting: dons_weeney
                      Yeah Krebs is a bit overrated isn't he? The bruins just need to take fliers on center prospects. No point in wasting pasta/mcavoy prime without a legit c. I guess maybe add a second with it? Maybe a first? Like how can buffalo even fit and sign more high end talent lmao


                      Probably should have offered him for Mitts. Or maybe they did, and Buffalo was not comfortable handing him to Boston.
                      9 mars à 12 h 31
                      #15
                      Démarrer sujet
                      Best armchair GM yet
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: juin 2023
                      Messages: 590
                      Mentions "j'aime": 139
                      Quoting: mokumboi
                      Probably should have offered him for Mitts. Or maybe they did, and Buffalo was not comfortable handing him to Boston.


                      Would've been such a good deal... looking back it's obvious he was available considering cozens/thompson are locked up and 1/2c. Missed out on Mitt and Hertl by chasing PLD... feels bad lmao
                      9 mars à 12 h 37
                      #16
                      Representing the 505
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: sept. 2020
                      Messages: 4,501
                      Mentions "j'aime": 3,686
                      Quoting: dons_weeney
                      Makes the most sense. Ullmark supposedly nixed trades to each of those teams. NJ was surprising though. I understand not wanting to be in LA


                      He reportedly has 14 of the 16 WC teams on his NTC; dude does not want to be West of the Mississippi apparently
                      9 mars à 12 h 38
                      #17
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: mai 2019
                      Messages: 40,426
                      Mentions "j'aime": 18,435
                      Quoting: dons_weeney
                      Apparently it was Thursday night. Not positive though. From what I can tell there was a three way trade developing between LA/BOS/NJ. My best guess is Dubois to BOS, Ullmark to NJ, maybe Toffoli and a NJ goalie to LA? Something seems off with that though.


                      I had seen that too…Kevin Weekes had tweeted a similar item late Thursday night. But I read elsewhere that Ullmark nixed a trade to a west coast team. So maybe it was just Ullmark to LAK that he killed. Also somewhere someone said that 14-of-16 teams on NTC were western conference.

                      I am guessing the multi team scenario was the trade Fitzgerald talked about after deadline…where he was having to give up two good assets (Toffoli and maybe Holtz?) because it was too steep a price. I think part of the calculus in offering Holtz for Markstrom was thinking Toffoli would extend. But I don’t think he ever planning on selling both.
                      9 mars à 12 h 38
                      #18
                      Representing the 505
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: sept. 2020
                      Messages: 4,501
                      Mentions "j'aime": 3,686
                      The Avs aren't going to be in the market for a starter; they'll ride with Georgie then see where they're at in June of next year.
                      9 mars à 12 h 47
                      #19
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: août 2020
                      Messages: 11,447
                      Mentions "j'aime": 9,083
                      I was hoping the Avs would sign Ullmark before the 21-22 season but this playoff run will determine Georgiev future in COL.
                      9 mars à 12 h 48
                      #20
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: mai 2023
                      Messages: 3,816
                      Mentions "j'aime": 1,181
                      Modifié 9 mars à 13 h 16
                      Ullmark loves playing for Boston because they accept him and it’s a quicker flight for his family (there is a 7 hour difference in flight)

                      I do think the PLD for Ullmark deal has rationale for both teams. Each team has a ready made replacement (Turcotte for PLD and Swayman for Ullmark). It’s a massive risk for both teams. The geography comment fits that much more than Jersey and Seravelli pointed to LA.

                      I don’t believe he nixed a deal to Jersey. If anything, my guess is Sweeney wanted more than Toffoli for Ullmark, which is fair. Jersey wasn’t willing to pay what Sweeney asked for
                      9 mars à 13 h 5
                      #21
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: juill. 2023
                      Messages: 5,676
                      Mentions "j'aime": 3,753
                      Sabres MIGHT be willing to do something like that
                      But we’re also really happy w how UPL developed this year,
                      so we might just look for a Vet backup in free agency
                      9 mars à 13 h 33
                      #22
                      Démarrer sujet
                      Best armchair GM yet
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: juin 2023
                      Messages: 590
                      Mentions "j'aime": 139
                      Quoting: Celtics21
                      Ullmark loves playing for Boston because they accept him and it’s a quicker flight for his family (there is a 7 hour difference in flight)

                      I do think the PLD for Ullmark deal has rationale for both teams. Each team has a ready made replacement (Turcotte for PLD and Swayman for Ullmark). It’s a massive risk for both teams. The geography comment fits that much more than Jersey and Seravelli pointed to LA.

                      I don’t believe he nixed a deal to Jersey. If anything, my guess is Sweeney wanted more than Toffoli for Ullmark, which is fair. Jersey wasn’t willing to pay what Sweeney asked for


                      Honestly that's good for both. Ullmark is an excellent piece to try and use in a package for a center or/or C prospect which New Jersey doesn't have available
                      9 mars à 15 h 4
                      #23
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: mai 2019
                      Messages: 40,426
                      Mentions "j'aime": 18,435
                      Quoting: Celtics21
                      Ullmark loves playing for Boston because they accept him and it’s a quicker flight for his family (there is a 7 hour difference in flight)

                      I do think the PLD for Ullmark deal has rationale for both teams. Each team has a ready made replacement (Turcotte for PLD and Swayman for Ullmark). It’s a massive risk for both teams. The geography comment fits that much more than Jersey and Seravelli pointed to LA.

                      I don’t believe he nixed a deal to Jersey. If anything, my guess is Sweeney wanted more than Toffoli for Ullmark, which is fair. Jersey wasn’t willing to pay what Sweeney asked for


                      It sounded to me there was at least some attempt at 3-team deal (Toffoli to LAK…Ullmark to NJD), but it didn’t sound like it got very far. Fitzgeralds comments after deadline made it sound like NJD was asked to put up another asset (maybe Holtz) and it just got too steep for him.
                      9 mars à 15 h 7
                      #24
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: mai 2023
                      Messages: 3,816
                      Mentions "j'aime": 1,181
                      Quoting: NHLfan10506
                      It sounded to me there was at least some attempt at 3-team deal (Toffoli to LAK…Ullmark to NJD), but it didn’t sound like it got very far. Fitzgeralds comments after deadline made it sound like NJD was asked to put up another asset (maybe Holtz) and it just got too steep for him.


                      My guess is it wasn’t Holtz, but it was a higher draft pick than he was willing to give.
                      9 mars à 16 h 5
                      #25
                      Démarrer sujet
                      Best armchair GM yet
                      Avatar de l'utilisateur
                      Rejoint: juin 2023
                      Messages: 590
                      Mentions "j'aime": 139
                      Quoting: NHLfan10506
                      It sounded to me there was at least some attempt at 3-team deal (Toffoli to LAK…Ullmark to NJD), but it didn’t sound like it got very far. Fitzgeralds comments after deadline made it sound like NJD was asked to put up another asset (maybe Holtz) and it just got too steep for him.


                      Interesting, I heard Ullmark may have nixed the trade there. So I guess it's still a possibility he can go there. NJ's prospects are overwhelming for me because there are so many lmao (and a lot have graduated) but do they have any decent center prospects still? I imagine they haven't drafted many since they're set for years with what they have. Although I'd take a first round pick from NJ for Ullmark for sure. As a devils fan, would you trade a first for Ullmark? I can't imagine they have a use for any more young talent...
                       
                      Répondre
                      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
                      Question:
                      Options:
                      Ajouter une option
                      Soumettre le sondage