SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper

Créé par: edeangel84
Équipe: 2023-24 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 5 mars 2024
Publié: 5 mars 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Bains, Arshdeep
  2. Lindholm, Elias (2 425 000 $ retained)
  3. Räty, Aatu
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Guentzel, Jake (3 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Ruhwedel, Chad
2.
BOS
  1. Lindholm, Elias (1 212 500 $ retained)
3.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2026 (NYI)
4.
TOR
  1. Nedeljkovic, Alex
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
5.
PIT
  1. Howden, Brett
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (VGK)
6.
PIT
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (NYI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de VAN
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYI
Logo de PIT
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYI
2026
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $78 880 176 $0 $82 500 $4 619 824 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
816 667 $816 667 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
836 667 $836 667 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 375 000 $5 375 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 mars à 19 h 53
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,789
Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
It's painful to see Arshdeep Bains in a Penguin's jersey.
Seriously Very Angry
edeangel84 a aimé ceci.
5 mars à 19 h 54
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,082
Mentions "j'aime": 9,341
Canucks aren’t adding Raty and a 1st to upgrade Lindholm to Guentzel
remowilliams a aimé ceci.
5 mars à 19 h 56
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 148
Mentions "j'aime": 30
So Toronto trades one of their RHD (their top need) for 4th string goalie?
5 mars à 20 h 4
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 122
Mentions "j'aime": 20
Meh….
5 mars à 20 h 6
#5
Démarrer sujet
JimmyPaek
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,945
Mentions "j'aime": 1,175
Quoting: mv21227
Canucks aren’t adding Raty and a 1st to upgrade Lindholm to Guentzel


Ok then we can trade with Vegas and you can keep Lindholm.
5 mars à 20 h 6
#6
Démarrer sujet
JimmyPaek
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,945
Mentions "j'aime": 1,175
Quoting: clinical
So Toronto trades one of their RHD (their top need) for 4th string goalie?


3rd at worst
5 mars à 20 h 10
#7
Avid Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 623
Mentions "j'aime": 308
Quoting: mv21227
Canucks aren’t adding Raty and a 1st to upgrade Lindholm to Guentzel


Only way we are is if we are getting the Boston return. Teams have learned from the Duchene trade.
mv21227 et remowilliams a aimé ceci.
5 mars à 20 h 19
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 2,273
Mentions "j'aime": 699
Toronto very much does not need another goalie
5 mars à 20 h 23
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,765
Mentions "j'aime": 1,172
Quoting: edeangel84
Ok then we can trade with Vegas and you can keep Lindholm.


They just acquired Mantha. Great get for Vegas
5 mars à 20 h 25
#10
Juice World
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 217
Mentions "j'aime": 26
good, now trade Jarry. that game against Calgary was all his fault bro can't cover the five hole wit his stick and got the catching ability of Matt Murray
5 mars à 20 h 29
#11
Démarrer sujet
JimmyPaek
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,945
Mentions "j'aime": 1,175
Quoting: Celtics21
They just acquired Mantha. Great get for Vegas


Ok get, I think a 2nd alone was more than enough. He’s not good enough to move the needle.
5 mars à 20 h 30
#12
Démarrer sujet
JimmyPaek
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,945
Mentions "j'aime": 1,175
Quoting: zRxstrictxd_88
good, now trade Jarry. that game against Calgary was all his fault bro can't cover the five hole wit his stick and got the catching ability of Matt Murray


lol what? That game was the entire team’s fault, especially Tanger and EK. Jarry let in one soft one.
5 mars à 20 h 43
#13
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: edeangel84
Ok then we can trade with Vegas and you can keep Lindholm.


Whatever we get from Boston would go to you maybe plus a small piece. You have Guentzel's value too high here. No one would pay that.
5 mars à 20 h 55
#14
Nightowl26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 1,507
Mentions "j'aime": 447
Isles don't pick up the phone...
5 mars à 21 h 13
#15
Démarrer sujet
JimmyPaek
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,945
Mentions "j'aime": 1,175
Quoting: BigShoots
Whatever we get from Boston would go to you maybe plus a small piece. You have Guentzel's value too high here. No one would pay that.


Pay what? A couple of alright prospects and a 1st for a top 15 winger in the league?
5 mars à 21 h 38
#16
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 1,914
Mentions "j'aime": 333
Quoting: BigShoots
Whatever we get from Boston would go to you maybe plus a small piece. You have Guentzel's value too high here. No one would pay that.


you keep thinking your getting a 40 goal scorer for nothing.
It's a good thing JR makes the decisions in VAN and realizes he has to give assets to get them and not you.
Otherwise VAN would never make a single trade ever.
You can be assured if JR wants Jake, he's giving up the pieces to make it work.
5 mars à 23 h 32
#17
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: edeangel84
Pay what? A couple of alright prospects and a 1st for a top 15 winger in the league?


You somehow ended up with 5 assets for renting Guentzel. That is not going to happen.
5 mars à 23 h 33
#18
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
you keep thinking your getting a 40 goal scorer for nothing.
It's a good thing JR makes the decisions in VAN and realizes he has to give assets to get them and not you.
Otherwise VAN would never make a single trade ever.
You can be assured if JR wants Jake, he's giving up the pieces to make it work.


I didn't say that. It'll cost a 1st, pospect and cap dumpish roster player/late pick/b prospect. Wing is not a premium position. And it's a rental. You don't get 5 assets for that type of asset.
6 mars à 0 h 12
#19
Démarrer sujet
JimmyPaek
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,945
Mentions "j'aime": 1,175
Quoting: BigShoots
I didn't say that. It'll cost a 1st, pospect and cap dumpish roster player/late pick/b prospect. Wing is not a premium position. And it's a rental. You don't get 5 assets for that type of asset.


We don’t need a cap dump lol.
6 mars à 0 h 22
#20
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 1,914
Mentions "j'aime": 333
Quoting: BigShoots
I didn't say that. It'll cost a 1st, pospect and cap dumpish roster player/late pick/b prospect. Wing is not a premium position. And it's a rental. You don't get 5 assets for that type of asset.


the "he's a rental part" doesn't mean anything.
You have no idea if they allowed them to work out a deal before the trade. You are just assuming.
I'm sure PIT knows exactly what Jake wants and can forward that info to who ever is interested.

Fact is it's the "prospect" part you refuse to recognize your own lacking. You don't want to part with a legit prospect.
That's the hold up on your end.
Don't think JR thinks the same way. He will rifle a prospect out.
The 1st is relative. A guy like Lysell is worth no more than the 1st. Simply swapping them is no big deal.
You aren't talking some top 5 pick here. It's like BOS building up Donato or telling everyone Studnicka was going to be the Bergeron replacement.
He's just a mediocre prospect at this point, no different then the 1st he'd be replacing.

Fact is you short the trade unwilling to part with assets. You think, oh I'll dump whatever dud prospect and the other team has to accept it's "a prospect"
But that just isn't how it works.

Bains and Raty just aren't the level of prospect going to get this done. Neither is Pod.

It's not about "5 assets"
It's about getting quality for a quality forward they are sending out.
And a 40 goal guy who puts up that pace regularly is going to get that quality no matter what you think.
You don't get something for nothing. You got to pay to get what you want, like everyone else.
When PIT traded for Kessel it cost their 1st, their best prospect in Kapanan who was well received at that point, and other stuff.
It's no different for you or VAN. And you are getting a better player back, who has none of the drama that surrounded Kessel.
If JR would pay it then, yet you think he won't pay it now? Or that you are too cheap to pay it, well you got another thing coming if you want that chance to win a cup.
6 mars à 0 h 55
#21
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: LuckyMoneyPuck
the "he's a rental part" doesn't mean anything.
You have no idea if they allowed them to work out a deal before the trade. You are just assuming.
I'm sure PIT knows exactly what Jake wants and can forward that info to who ever is interested.

Fact is it's the "prospect" part you refuse to recognize your own lacking. You don't want to part with a legit prospect.
That's the hold up on your end.
Don't think JR thinks the same way. He will rifle a prospect out.
The 1st is relative. A guy like Lysell is worth no more than the 1st. Simply swapping them is no big deal.
You aren't talking some top 5 pick here. It's like BOS building up Donato or telling everyone Studnicka was going to be the Bergeron replacement.
He's just a mediocre prospect at this point, no different then the 1st he'd be replacing.

Fact is you short the trade unwilling to part with assets. You think, oh I'll dump whatever dud prospect and the other team has to accept it's "a prospect"
But that just isn't how it works.

Bains and Raty just aren't the level of prospect going to get this done. Neither is Pod.

It's not about "5 assets"
It's about getting quality for a quality forward they are sending out.
And a 40 goal guy who puts up that pace regularly is going to get that quality no matter what you think.
You don't get something for nothing. You got to pay to get what you want, like everyone else.
When PIT traded for Kessel it cost their 1st, their best prospect in Kapanan who was well received at that point, and other stuff.
It's no different for you or VAN. And you are getting a better player back, who has none of the drama that surrounded Kessel.
If JR would pay it then, yet you think he won't pay it now? Or that you are too cheap to pay it, well you got another thing coming if you want that chance to win a cup.


In all reality whether it's a rental or a long term deal negotiated the return is the same. Rental carries the risk of him leaving, long term contract carriers the late yrs risk. See Horvat and many others as examples.

Lysell is a legit prospect. A 1st is a legit prospect. Raty is a legit prospect. The others are trending to be solid bottom 6 players.

To be fair the proposal is horrible value trading Lindholm away. Should be Lysell and 1st at least. Probably a bit more.

If you think you're getting Willander or Lekkerimaki that's unrealistic. If you think you are getting 5 assets and no cap thats unrealistic.

We are giving up Lindholm in this deal too hahah he just cost a 1st ++

Anyway Guentzel will get a 1st, prospect, and one more thing that has negligible value. That's just what it costs for rentals or 30 yrs old sign long term wingers. no matter that hes a great player.
6 mars à 0 h 55
#22
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: edeangel84
We don’t need a cap dump lol.


It's kinda how these trades often work if you want full value. It may seem like an ok player at the time of the trade.
6 mars à 0 h 57
#23
Démarrer sujet
JimmyPaek
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,945
Mentions "j'aime": 1,175
Quoting: BigShoots
It's kinda how these trades often work if you want full value. It may seem like an ok player at the time of the trade.


Mikheyev is not an ok player. He is a waste and a bad contract. We don’t need to take him to do you a solid.
6 mars à 1 h 1
#24
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: edeangel84
Mikheyev is not an ok player. He is a waste and a bad contract. We don’t need to take him to do you a solid.


Hahah someone is testy. I never mentioned him.
6 mars à 1 h 2
#25
Démarrer sujet
JimmyPaek
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,945
Mentions "j'aime": 1,175
Quoting: BigShoots
Hahah someone is testy. I never mentioned him.


He’s in over half of the “rip us off” ACGM’s
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage