SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What would these guys cost and are they available

Créé par: BCAPP
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 29 févr. 2024
Publié: 29 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Just looking at some good two-way/defensive physical d with term on non playoff teams.

Are any of them available and what would they cost
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
4.
NYI
    Haha okay this one is just a dream. But when they resign Dobson maybe they don't have space? Lol. I know it's not happening.
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de OTT
    2025
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2026
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2683 500 000 $100 456 450 $0 $0 $-16 956 450 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    796 667 $796 667 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    766 667 $766 667 $
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    875 000 $875 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    6 150 000 $6 150 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    762 500 $762 500 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    29 févr. à 21 h 41
    #1
    Nightowl26
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 1,508
    Mentions "j'aime": 447
    Toronto and Isles don't match up.
    FoxYou727 a aimé ceci.
    29 févr. à 21 h 42
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 932
    Mentions "j'aime": 534
    A top pairing RD for 7 years

    One of Minten and Cowan definitely. I know Knies is untouchable but he'd be nice
    A 1st and 2nd too
    I would ask about Liligren and Timmins but neither have played a full 82 games so idk what there true value is
    BCAPP a aimé ceci.
    29 févr. à 21 h 49
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 5,347
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,385
    Middleton would cost a 1st or a 2nd+good prospect
    SimonVenell a aimé ceci.
    29 févr. à 21 h 56
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 769
    Mentions "j'aime": 480
    I created an ACGM of my own earlier today where I explained my thoughts on whether Larsson is available and what a reasonable hypothetical trade package might look like. I'll just post the link here if you want to go check it out.

    https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4932594
    KrakBirds23 a aimé ceci.
    29 févr. à 22 h 7
    #5
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,563
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,698
    Pulock will be 30 in October and is extended for six full seasons. No thanks from the Leafs.
    29 févr. à 22 h 34
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Caerii
    Middleton would cost a 1st or a 2nd+good prospect


    That much eh? He's the only guy on the list under 20 minutes a night.
    29 févr. à 22 h 36
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: KrakenTheCode
    I created an ACGM of my own earlier today where I explained my thoughts on whether Larsson is available and what a reasonable hypothetical trade package might look like. I'll just post the link here if you want to go check it out.

    https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4932594


    Thanks for the link! I was hoping for about one piece less. Like the first niemela and third without Robertson. But I see your point. Cheers
    KrakBirds23 a aimé ceci.
    29 févr. à 22 h 36
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Nightowl26
    Toronto and Isles don't match up.


    Quoting: FoxYou727
    A top pairing RD for 7 years

    One of Minten and Cowan definitely. I know Knies is untouchable but he'd be nice
    A 1st and 2nd too
    I would ask about Liligren and Timmins but neither have played a full 82 games so idk what there true value is


    The pulock one was mostly a pie in the sky dream lol
    FoxYou727 a aimé ceci.
    1 mars à 0 h 39
    #9
    Minnesota Wild
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2016
    Messages: 990
    Mentions "j'aime": 334
    Quoting: BCAPP
    That much eh? He's the only guy on the list under 20 minutes a night.


    First, he's at 19:57 with zero PP time so it's not like we're talking about someone getting 16 minutes. Second, he has another year left on a cheap contact when we still have one more year of cap hell left. We have no need to trade him so it will likely take somewhat of an overpayment to get him. To replace him in the lineup will likely cost us more so we would need a decent incentive to make our already complicated cap situation even worse.
    1 mars à 2 h 27
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 5,347
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,385
    Quoting: futurehofer
    First, he's at 19:57 with zero PP time so it's not like we're talking about someone getting 16 minutes. Second, he has another year left on a cheap contact when we still have one more year of cap hell left. We have no need to trade him so it will likely take somewhat of an overpayment to get him. To replace him in the lineup will likely cost us more so we would need a decent incentive to make our already complicated cap situation even worse.


    He also balances the top four very well, playing well with Faber so Brodin can anchor his own pairing. And he brings size and physicality on the back end, which is something we don't have much of. Overall solid, if unspectacular, top 4 guy signed cheap for one more year with very little reason to move him.
    futurehofer et BCAPP a aimé ceci.
    1 mars à 5 h 50
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: futurehofer
    First, he's at 19:57 with zero PP time so it's not like we're talking about someone getting 16 minutes. Second, he has another year left on a cheap contact when we still have one more year of cap hell left. We have no need to trade him so it will likely take somewhat of an overpayment to get him. To replace him in the lineup will likely cost us more so we would need a decent incentive to make our already complicated cap situation even worse.


    Ahh your cap hell. I forgot there was another year of it.
    1 mars à 8 h 16
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2022
    Messages: 8,546
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,400
    Murphy is likely not available.
    1 mars à 8 h 35
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 116
    Mentions "j'aime": 55
    I doubt Toronto would want to pay Seattle's asking price for their top pairing defenseman
    BCAPP et DealFinder67 a aimé ceci.
    1 mars à 9 h 27
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Hawksguy81
    Murphy is likely not available.


    Interesting. Why not? For the record I wanted him more than McCabe last year, but am happy enough with McCabe.

    I'm surprised you say he's not available though. Seems like they'd appreciate assets as they are clearly rebuilding.
    1 mars à 9 h 41
    #15
    We Need D!!
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2023
    Messages: 1,241
    Mentions "j'aime": 354
    Borgen is my #1 target at 2.7M and another year on his deal. These other guys aside from Middlestadt will cost more than Tre wants to spend. I’d say Lily, Robertson and a 3rd and maybe another pick for Borgen
    1 mars à 9 h 43
    #16
    We Need D!!
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2023
    Messages: 1,241
    Mentions "j'aime": 354
    Quoting: jaysinhorror
    I doubt Toronto would want to pay Seattle's asking price for their top pairing defenseman


    Don’t know that until you try. Toronto fans would be willing to give a fair bit for Larsson. 😂
    1 mars à 11 h 10
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2022
    Messages: 8,546
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,400
    Quoting: BCAPP
    Interesting. Why not? For the record I wanted him more than McCabe last year, but am happy enough with McCabe.

    I'm surprised you say he's not available though. Seems like they'd appreciate assets as they are clearly rebuilding.


    The fire sale in Chicago is over. With the recent extensions given to Dickinson, Foligno and Mrazak, the Hawks are apparently looking to establish some continuity in the roster for the next two seasons with their veteran leadership group. Of which Murphy is a key guy. Hawks have accumulated a TON of prospects and draft capital already. Next season they need to start winning some games.

    McCabe was expendable last year because of the depth the Hawks had at LD in their system. They had multiple ready-to-go replacements. The Hawks don't have that same depth at RD. If they trade Murphy, it leaves a hole they can't fill internally.

    Add to that Murphy bought a new home in Chicago last summer, and he and his wife (who is from Chicago) just announced they are expecting their first child later this year.
    BCAPP a aimé ceci.
    2 mars à 15 h 26
    #18
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Hawksguy81
    The fire sale in Chicago is over. With the recent extensions given to Dickinson, Foligno and Mrazak, the Hawks are apparently looking to establish some continuity in the roster for the next two seasons with their veteran leadership group. Of which Murphy is a key guy. Hawks have accumulated a TON of prospects and draft capital already. Next season they need to start winning some games.

    McCabe was expendable last year because of the depth the Hawks had at LD in their system. They had multiple ready-to-go replacements. The Hawks don't have that same depth at RD. If they trade Murphy, it leaves a hole they can't fill internally.

    Add to that Murphy bought a new home in Chicago last summer, and he and his wife (who is from Chicago) just announced they are expecting their first child later this year.


    Makes sense. Thanks for explaining.
    Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
    2 mars à 15 h 29
    #19
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: DealFinder67
    Borgen is my #1 target at 2.7M and another year on his deal. These other guys aside from Middlestadt will cost more than Tre wants to spend. I’d say Lily, Robertson and a 3rd and maybe another pick for Borgen


    Borgen is a third pairing defenseman. He's good at what h does and I'd be happy to have him but he's never played top 4 minutes and is in his late 20s. If someone thinks he can take that next step I suppose we could gamble.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage