Probably would have to swap Morrow to someone like Heimosalmi for the Canes to accept.

Faulk is not returning that

Buch is great but the canes would pass here. That is a lot for a 1.25 seasons and too old for the Canes to re-sign

I do agree with your take on the team (that they're likely not going to be a contender for 3 years, and so why bother really). But I think there could be more follow through on the direction to set up that future contention window.

If they're not going to be a contender for three years, why waste a retention slot to dump Krug for basically nothing when his contract will be up in three years anyway (with his trade clause reducing in one year), while keeping Parayko's contract (years 34-37 of which would be running through the "new" contention window) instead of trying to trade him instead? I think he's played pretty well but the upside is that he's the SAME player in three years. He's not going to be a better player. He'll probably be a worse one. Why should a non-contending team take that risk? Keep Krug (or Faulk) instead and peacefully move on in three years, while maybe someone gives you something actually useful now in order to take on the last 6 years of that Parayko deal at full freight.

If they're going to sell assets with term, the assets that make sense to sell are a) players who are good and/or b) players whose remaining term is prohibitive for the long term future of this team. To me that describes Buchnevich/Parayko/Binnington/maybe Faulk. I'm not really worried about moving Leddy/Krug/Schenn/Saad. Most of both groups will have to turn over sooner than later, as we'll need the roster spaces, but as far as maximizing value while not handcuffing the future goes, I think the first group should be the priority on moving out.

The second I see the name Chiarot, I am out.

I am interested in the Saad trade but not this year.
I don't think there is much of a point in it this year for PIT. Come talk to me next year at TDL. I might be willing to make that swap.
As of right now I see no benefit for PIT. Smith will be a contract year next year. I want to see how he plays. My thoughts are the play improves.
If not, and you still want to swap, depending on Saad's play we'll see.

Would Carolina take Buchnevich for Kk + Morrow + 1st?

Unlikely having our 2nd best prospect involved in a buch deal. Trading KK sets us back in the center department too.

Makes sense. Didn’t know if Canes and Blue would be training partners for Buchnevich. Especially after the haul Calgary got for Lindholm I expect Buchnevich to get more