SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Monahan is not going to be traded for a first round pick

Créé par: Wreckless
Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 2 févr. 2024
Publié: 2 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
One again, fiction becomes fact.
And if Winnipeg has to play Colorado or Dallas in the first round and loses, that’s ballpark the 19th overall pick (Tampa’s slot last year).
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Vanecek, Vitek
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
3.
MTL
  1. Raanta, Antti
Détails additionnels:
Cap dump
CAR
4.
NYR
    What would it cost? And what’s been wrong with him this year?
    5.
    ANA
      What’s the cost for Zegras?
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2024
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de WPG
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de CAR
      Logo de COL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de WSH
      2025
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de CGY
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de DET
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      2026
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      Logo de MTL
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2383 500 000 $78 805 416 $1 170 000 $4 277 500 $4 694 584 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
      C
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
      C, AD
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
      C, AG
      RFA - 4
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
      C, AG
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
      AD, AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
      AD, AG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
      AD, AG
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
      AD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      812 500 $812 500 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      775 000 $775 000 $
      AD, AG
      RFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
      DG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance275 000 $$275K)
      DD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
      DG/DD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      828 333 $828 333 $
      DG/DD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      925 000 $925 000 $
      G
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      875 000 $875 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
      DD
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      766 667 $766 667 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
      G
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      762 500 $762 500 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Équipe de réserve
      Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (350 000 $$350K350 000 $$350K)
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      3 400 000 $3 400 000 $ (2 250 000 $$2M2 250 000 $$2M)
      G
      UFA - 2

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      2 févr. à 19 h 8
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2018
      Messages: 19,786
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,078
      Bro, you smoking that good stuff if you think you're getting a 1st for a .901 goalie
      mv21227 a aimé ceci.
      2 févr. à 19 h 9
      #2
      Bcarlo25
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2018
      Messages: 21,432
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,074
      what do you win for being the 100th person to post this today?
      2 févr. à 19 h 11
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2023
      Messages: 130
      Mentions "j'aime": 35
      Take the victory lap on Monahan. Thats a huge W for the Habs.
      Wreckless a aimé ceci.
      2 févr. à 19 h 12
      #4
      mokumboi
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2019
      Messages: 29,647
      Mentions "j'aime": 11,476
      Heh. Let's not get carried away.
      2 févr. à 19 h 17
      #5
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2023
      Messages: 12,579
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,353
      3rd to dump Vanacek
      7th for Primeau
      5th for Pearson
      3rd for Harris.

      I’d give you a second for the package
      2 févr. à 19 h 17
      #6
      Démarrer sujet
      Wreckless
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2020
      Messages: 3,412
      Mentions "j'aime": 445
      Quoting: Caniac2000
      Bro, you smoking that good stuff if you think you're getting a 1st for a .901 goalie


      When you look at Allen’s stats, consider that we’ve been playing with 4-5 rookie D for the past 2 years every night. He’s the best goalie out there, on a good contract in a rising cap environment, with the least amount of risk tied to term left on his deal. Would be the perfect fit for Carolina. We’re basically talking about an early 2nd round pick. There’s no better way for Carolina to improve their team this deadline.
      habitantlecolon a aimé ceci.
      2 févr. à 19 h 20
      #7
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2023
      Messages: 12,579
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,353
      Quoting: Wreckless
      When you look at Allen’s stats, consider that we’ve been playing with 4-5 rookie D for the past 2 years every night. He’s the best goalie out there, on a good contract in a rising cap environment, with the least amount of risk tied to term left on his deal. Would be the perfect fit for Carolina. We’re basically talking about an early 2nd round pick. There’s no better way for Carolina to improve their team this deadline.


      If you want the 1st it’s Montembault going out not Allen.

      Like legitimately be real with yourself.
      2 févr. à 19 h 26
      #8
      Démarrer sujet
      Wreckless
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2020
      Messages: 3,412
      Mentions "j'aime": 445
      Quoting: dgibb10
      If you want the 1st it’s Montembault going out not Allen.

      Like legitimately be real with yourself.


      That’s possibly on the table.
      2 févr. à 19 h 29
      #9
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2023
      Messages: 12,579
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,353
      Quoting: Wreckless
      That’s possibly on the table.


      I think you could certainly convince a cap strapped team to shell out a 1st for Montembault. I was wary on him earlier due to the lack of proven sample size and pre NHL success for his age, but as of so far he’s continued to impress. Maybe would have to throw back a 3rd or something but could be a possibility.

      However with Allen’s contract, age, and numbers I just struggle to see a team giving up meaningful assets for him
      2 févr. à 19 h 29
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2018
      Messages: 19,786
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,078
      Quoting: Wreckless
      When you look at Allen’s stats, consider that we’ve been playing with 4-5 rookie D for the past 2 years every night. He’s the best goalie out there, on a good contract in a rising cap environment, with the least amount of risk tied to term left on his deal. Would be the perfect fit for Carolina. We’re basically talking about an early 2nd round pick. There’s no better way for Carolina to improve their team this deadline.


      Carolina also have Freddie coming back, whose better than Allen... you're not getting a 1st for him.
      2 févr. à 19 h 34
      #11
      Prime Primeau
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2023
      Messages: 5,554
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,204
      Quoting: dgibb10
      3rd to dump Vanacek
      7th for Primeau
      5th for Pearson
      3rd for Harris.

      I’d give you a second for the package


      Wrong valuation but I somewhat agree
      Harris second
      Primeau fourth
      Pearson negative fifth (or seventh retained)
      Vanecek negative third
      So about a second and a third for the package
      2 févr. à 19 h 43
      #12
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2023
      Messages: 12,579
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,353
      Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
      Wrong valuation but I somewhat agree
      Harris second
      Primeau fourth
      Pearson negative fifth (or seventh retained)
      Vanecek negative third
      So about a second and a third for the package


      I could see Harris getting a 2nd potentially.

      I think NJD tries to take advantage of the crunch here if it’s us like we did for Siegenthaler.

      With Barron, Xhekaj, Struble, Matheson, Kovacevic, Guhle, Savard. That already makes 7 other dmen.

      Then if Mailloux/Hutson/Reinbacher are ready that’s 3 more.

      I don’t believe Montreal wants to have less than 2 vet dman on the roster so I expect at least 2 of the vets to stay. Dont wanna run out all rookies.

      The current system of keeping Barron down in the minors doesn’t seem like a long term solution.

      I’d say something has to give and I’d expect to be the LD without waiver exemption status
      GuyGuyGuy et Wreckless a aimé ceci.
      2 févr. à 19 h 47
      #13
      Démarrer sujet
      Wreckless
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2020
      Messages: 3,412
      Mentions "j'aime": 445
      Quoting: Caniac2000
      Carolina also have Freddie coming back, whose better than Allen... you're not getting a 1st for him.


      Andersen’s health is a giant question mark at best, and the Canes are going for the cup. They’ll be in on the auction. We’ll see who offers the most.
      2 févr. à 19 h 47
      #14
      Démarrer sujet
      Wreckless
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2020
      Messages: 3,412
      Mentions "j'aime": 445
      Quoting: dgibb10
      I think you could certainly convince a cap strapped team to shell out a 1st for Montembault. I was wary on him earlier due to the lack of proven sample size and pre NHL success for his age, but as of so far he’s continued to impress. Maybe would have to throw back a 3rd or something but could be a possibility.

      However with Allen’s contract, age, and numbers I just struggle to see a team giving up meaningful assets for him


      Heard the same thing over and over for Monahan. About his injury history, doesn’t produce enough, yadda yadda yadda…
      2 févr. à 19 h 48
      #15
      Prime Primeau
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2023
      Messages: 5,554
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,204
      Quoting: dgibb10
      I could see Harris getting a 2nd potentially.

      I think NJD tries to take advantage of the crunch here if it’s us like we did for Siegenthaler.

      With Barron, Xhekaj, Struble, Matheson, Kovacevic, Guhle, Savard. That already makes 7 other dmen.

      Then if Mailloux/Hutson/Reinbacher are ready that’s 3 more.

      I don’t believe Montreal wants to have less than 2 vet dman on the roster so I expect at least 2 of the vets to stay. Dont wanna run out all rookies.

      The current system of keeping Barron down in the minors doesn’t seem like a long term solution.

      I’d say something has to give and I’d expect to be the LD without waiver exemption status


      Personnally I think they are showcasing Struble for a good return. He would be the guy I trade
      2 févr. à 19 h 49
      #16
      Démarrer sujet
      Wreckless
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2020
      Messages: 3,412
      Mentions "j'aime": 445
      Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
      Wrong valuation but I somewhat agree
      Harris second
      Primeau fourth
      Pearson negative fifth (or seventh retained)
      Vanecek negative third
      So about a second and a third for the package


      Pearson has value as a depth option if a team has LTIR space. Not negative value at all.
      2 févr. à 19 h 51
      #17
      Démarrer sujet
      Wreckless
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2020
      Messages: 3,412
      Mentions "j'aime": 445
      Quoting: dgibb10
      I could see Harris getting a 2nd potentially.

      I think NJD tries to take advantage of the crunch here if it’s us like we did for Siegenthaler.

      With Barron, Xhekaj, Struble, Matheson, Kovacevic, Guhle, Savard. That already makes 7 other dmen.

      Then if Mailloux/Hutson/Reinbacher are ready that’s 3 more.

      I don’t believe Montreal wants to have less than 2 vet dman on the roster so I expect at least 2 of the vets to stay. Dont wanna run out all rookies.

      The current system of keeping Barron down in the minors doesn’t seem like a long term solution.

      I’d say something has to give and I’d expect to be the LD without waiver exemption status


      I agree. We could always bring in an overpaid vet though, and gain further assets from someone looking to unload.
      2 févr. à 19 h 52
      #18
      Démarrer sujet
      Wreckless
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2020
      Messages: 3,412
      Mentions "j'aime": 445
      Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
      Personnally I think they are showcasing Struble for a good return. He would be the guy I trade


      It’s possible, but for the same reason, I’d rather keep him. Plus he’s waivers exempt until 2026-2027.
      2 févr. à 19 h 54
      #19
      boltsfan71
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2023
      Messages: 1,964
      Mentions "j'aime": 695
      tampa passes
      2 févr. à 19 h 54
      #20
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2023
      Messages: 12,579
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,353
      Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
      Personnally I think they are showcasing Struble for a good return. He would be the guy I trade


      That could be a possibility, I won’t pretend to have any inside info on the habs plans? Would Struble fetch that much in a trade tho?
      2 févr. à 19 h 57
      #21
      Démarrer sujet
      Wreckless
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2020
      Messages: 3,412
      Mentions "j'aime": 445
      Quoting: boltsfan71
      tampa passes


      you would have said the same thing the first time as well.
      2 févr. à 19 h 57
      #22
      Prime Primeau
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2023
      Messages: 5,554
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,204
      Quoting: Wreckless
      Pearson has value as a depth option if a team has LTIR space. Not negative value at all.

      He is making 3m and he is awful. I don’t know what can be more of a negative asset player
      2 févr. à 20 h 0
      #23
      Prime Primeau
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2023
      Messages: 5,554
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,204
      Quoting: dgibb10
      That could be a possibility, I won’t pretend to have any inside info on the habs plans? Would Struble fetch that much in a trade tho?

      Struble has been a revelation this year. He got from like 9th on our LD depth chart to 3rd. I think he could easily fetch a high second or a young forward. The team that comes to mind when talking for a D trade is Buffalo. I think Rosen for Struble make sense
      dgibb10 a aimé ceci.
      2 févr. à 20 h 0
      #24
      Démarrer sujet
      Wreckless
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2020
      Messages: 3,412
      Mentions "j'aime": 445
      Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
      He is making 3m and he is awful. I don’t know what can be more of a negative asset player


      At half salary, at the deadline. Costs $400k.
      2 févr. à 20 h 0
      #25
      I Love J Boqvist
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2023
      Messages: 12,579
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,353
      Quoting: Wreckless
      Heard the same thing over and over for Monahan. About his injury history, doesn’t produce enough, yadda yadda yadda…


      I didn’t and don’t think Monahan was very good.

      I don’t remember every comment I’ve made, but my general takes were:
      - I think he’s too slow for a team like NJD/Colorado/Edmonton to pay much for him
      -I think there’s no chance he gets a non playoff 1st
      -I think he gets a fair amount less than Lindholm

      I feel like I wasn’t wrong on any of those points.


      What he had were the basic counting stats, cheap contract (without the commitment of term), and playing the most valuable position in hockey.

      Allen has term that’s honestly pretty pricey, pretty bad basic stats, and plays the least valuable position in hockey.

      If Jake Allen had 1 year on his deal I’d be on board to have him in jersey similar to Mrazek (I made a ton of Mrazek proposals before his extension). That 2nd year just makes it tough bc I think I’d rather have 4 mill this offseason to choose my goalie (there’s quite a few low tier options and should be a number of rentals available)
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage