SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL 24

Créé par: Nolan16
Équipe: 2023-24 Jets de Winnipeg
Date de création initiale: 23 janv. 2024
Publié: 23 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Not sure how to make the cap space work. Want to trade schmidt but watching the bts it looks like hes a favorite. Don't need all 3 trades just a place to put 3 trades. With schief hurt lowry isn't a first line center and its showing. Chychrun would put jets into best d core in the league conversation. Dumping Iafallo contract during a year hes doing plus with stanley
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Heinola, Ville
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (WPG)
2.
OTT
  1. Lucius, Chaz
  2. Salomonsson, Elias
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (WPG)
3.
WPG
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
CHI
  1. Iafallo, Alex
  2. Stanley, Logan
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2025
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2026
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2483 500 000 $86 957 858 $0 $850 000 $-3 457 858 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 437 500 $3 437 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 janv. à 17 h 57
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,132
Mentions "j'aime": 7,189
Modifié 23 janv. à 18 h 49
Calgary doesn't do the first one.

Huge overpay for another LHD in Chychrun. The Jets shouldn't be paying more for him than Ottawa paid for him.

No need to do the 3rd trade.
JK74 et CanMerc a aimé ceci.
23 janv. à 18 h 0
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,332
Mentions "j'aime": 11,311
Why would CHI pay a 2nd for Iafallo and Stanley?
Hawksguy81, JK74, SociallyHawkward and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
23 janv. à 18 h 1
#3
Démarrer sujet
Nolanjanz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 66
Mentions "j'aime": 5
3rd is purely cap dump and to get rid of stanley. Shoudlve switched what jets give up in the flames and sens.
23 janv. à 18 h 2
#4
Démarrer sujet
Nolanjanz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 66
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: Windjammer
Calgary doesn't do the first one.

Huge overpay for whither LHD in Chychrun. The Jets shouldn't be paying more for him than Ottawa paid for him.

No need to do the 3rd trade.

3rd is purely cap dump and to get rid of stanley. Shoudlve switched what jets give up in the flames and sens.
23 janv. à 18 h 4
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,119
Mentions "j'aime": 11,086
Hawks decline. They aren't buyers. They aren't spending a 2nd on Iafallo. And Stanley couldn't be needed less in Chicago.
JK74, LivingAnew, SociallyHawkward and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
23 janv. à 18 h 4
#6
Démarrer sujet
Nolanjanz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 66
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: Garak
Why would CHI pay a 2nd for Iafallo and Stanley?


Iafallo showed what happened when he plays with talent and minutes and could be good for Bedard. If vancouver does well that pick is in the 60s. I just want to get rid of stanley
23 janv. à 18 h 6
#7
Démarrer sujet
Nolanjanz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 66
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Hawks decline. They aren't buyers. They aren't spending a 2nd on Iafallo. And Stanley couldn't be needed less in Chicago.


They have alot of early picks in the next 2 years and with the way the nucks have been playing that could be in the 60s
23 janv. à 18 h 7
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,332
Mentions "j'aime": 11,311
Quoting: Nolan16
Iafallo showed what happened when he plays with talent and minutes and could be good for Bedard. If vancouver does well that pick is in the 60s. I just want to get rid of stanley


Maybe... But that is still way too much.
JK74 et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
23 janv. à 18 h 8
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 1,587
Mentions "j'aime": 3,331
Quoting: Nolan16
They have alot of early picks in the next 2 years and with the way the nucks have been playing that could be in the 60s


Just because Chicago has a lot of early picks doesn't mean they're trading them for garbage.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
23 janv. à 18 h 10
#10
Démarrer sujet
Nolanjanz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 66
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: Garak
Maybe... But that is still way too much.


Should be 3rd or 4th considering what they got for him. But with Stanley and a 5th thought a Vancouver 2nd would be justifiable
23 janv. à 18 h 13
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,119
Mentions "j'aime": 11,086
Quoting: Nolan16
They have alot of early picks in the next 2 years and with the way the nucks have been playing that could be in the 60s


Yep. And having lots of early picks is how a GM moves up in the draft to grab a player he wants. Or how a GM loads up on higher end talent. Iafallo is a solid player, but he's north of 30 now and won't be part of any playoff team in Chicago. Spending a 2nd on him is just poor asset management.
LivingAnew et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
23 janv. à 18 h 16
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,119
Mentions "j'aime": 11,086
Quoting: Nolan16
Should be 3rd or 4th considering what they got for him. But with Stanley and a 5th thought a Vancouver 2nd would be justifiable


Hawks might give up a 4th for Iafallo. Jets can keep Stanley and the 5th. Hawks don't need either.
Garak et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
23 janv. à 18 h 24
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,332
Mentions "j'aime": 11,311
Quoting: Nolan16
Should be 3rd or 4th considering what they got for him. But with Stanley and a 5th thought a Vancouver 2nd would be justifiable


Oh ok. Well the answer is no, CHI isn't doing that. If they move 2nd round picks, it'll be for upgrades (unlikely), or moving up in the draft (more likely), not an old expensive guy, a redundancy on an expiring contract that doesn't help our rebuild, and a late round pick. We have plenty of bodies and way more than enough LHD.
LivingAnew et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
23 janv. à 18 h 41
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2023
Messages: 543
Mentions "j'aime": 428
Modifié 23 janv. à 18 h 48
No to all…
Drop Heinola and do the 1st + 3rd for just Lindholm, or include Tanev and add a small bit to your proposal from WPG
Drop the OTT trade completely. Jets don’t need overrated Chychrun
Drop the last trade, as there is zero reason to do it
23 janv. à 18 h 43
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2023
Messages: 543
Mentions "j'aime": 428
Quoting: Nolan16
3rd is purely cap dump and to get rid of stanley. Shoudlve switched what jets give up in the flames and sens.


Quoting: Nolan16
3rd is purely cap dump and to get rid of stanley. Shoudlve switched what jets give up in the flames and sens.


Quoting: Nolan16
They have alot of early picks in the next 2 years and with the way the nucks have been playing that could be in the 60s


Stanley is a serviceable depth D for the playoffs, there is zero reason to “dump” him
Garak a aimé ceci.
23 janv. à 18 h 46
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,332
Mentions "j'aime": 11,311
Quoting: CanMerc
Stanley is a serviceable depth D for the playoffs, there is zero reason to “dump” him


Especially not to a team that doesn't need serviceable depth D.
CanMerc et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
23 janv. à 21 h 53
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,295
Mentions "j'aime": 9,751
Quoting: Nolan16
Iafallo showed what happened when he plays with talent and minutes and could be good for Bedard. If vancouver does well that pick is in the 60s. I just want to get rid of stanley


So therefore the Hawks should give up a 2nd round pick versus signing someone in free agency without giving up any picks? Seriously your logic is flawed
24 janv. à 9 h 37
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 3,902
Mentions "j'aime": 1,760
Salomonsson shouldnt be going anywhere. I like JC but with only one more year it doesnt make sense to deal a D that is team controlled and has a high upside
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage