SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tarasenko to the Other Team Who Wanted Him

Créé par: Exotic_Butter
Équipe: 2023-24 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 20 janv. 2024
Publié: 21 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
OTT
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
CAR
  1. Tarasenko, Vladimir (2 500 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de CAR
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $80 692 380 $0 $1 850 000 $2 807 620 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
805 000 $805 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 janv. à 14 h 58
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,939
Mentions "j'aime": 23,969
That’s what he’ll get . He’s been so good
21 janv. à 14 h 58
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 569
Mentions "j'aime": 176
Cant imagine the canes want to do this considering the offseason
21 janv. à 15 h 0
#3
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 34,041
Mentions "j'aime": 20,959
Last time Carolina spent a 1st besides stealing KK was in the Skeji trade

That guy had term

I just cant see them spending high assets on rentals its not their style

Look at last TDL

Ghost for a 3rd
Pulijarvi for meh prospect

Or the TDL before that

Domi for meh prospect


That team makes very calculated trades
21 janv. à 16 h 41
#4
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,644
Mentions "j'aime": 3,473
Canes don’t do 1sts for rentals, and the interest probably isn’t there anymore considering how the offseason transpired.
22 janv. à 22 h 21
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 14
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: evelutions2
Canes don’t do 1sts for rentals, and the interest probably isn’t there anymore considering how the offseason transpired.


While I agree with this analysis of the Canes recent refusal to move first round picks the Canes also haven't seen any thing past the conference finals since 2006. Maybe it's time to change your ways for success. If what you have done at the deadline the past few years isn't enough to get you over the hump why keep that mentality.
22 janv. à 23 h 4
#6
On the Rod Meal Plan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 502
Mentions "j'aime": 306
Quoting: Exotic_Butter
While I agree with this analysis of the Canes recent refusal to move first round picks the Canes also haven't seen any thing past the conference finals since 2006. Maybe it's time to change your ways for success. If what you have done at the deadline the past few years isn't enough to get you over the hump why keep that mentality.


This is a silly argument for multiple reasons, but mainly: The teams that spent multiple first last season (Boston and Toronto) got beat by the same team that beat the Canes. The Rangers also spent a first, and didn't make it out of the first round. The two teams in the SCF? Neither spent more than a 3rd (in Florida's case, they didn't spend at all at the TDL).

It's also silly because while this core of players hasn't made it past the ECF in their two trips there (I hate the whole "since 2006" thing, as if the team didn't go a decade of missing the playoffs with multiple teams), they have still made it twice! And have made the playoffs multiple every years since they first got back in 2019.

Finally, if you are going to spend a 1st on a rental, it really ought to be for a strong need (IMO). Currently the Canes biggest need is Goalie, with an upgrade at 2C being the second biggest. That could all change with injury or whatnot in the next month and a half, but as it stands Tarasenko just isn't that big of a need to spend a first on.
evelutions2 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage