SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Most the jets would give for Monahan

Créé par: Howie
Équipe: 2023-24 Jets de Winnipeg
Date de création initiale: 15 janv. 2024
Publié: 15 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Jets don't need him but ig if they do trade for him this is max so habs fan know what we'd pay
Transactions
WPG
  1. Monahan, Sean
Détails additionnels:
MAX
MTL
  1. Wagner, Fabian
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (WPG)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de WPG
Logo de MTL
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2025
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2026
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2483 500 000 $84 492 858 $0 $865 000 $-992 858 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 437 500 $3 437 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 985 000 $1 985 000 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
Who wins the deal?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


15 janv. à 20 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,020
Mentions "j'aime": 477
you talked to Chevyscream
drambui et RationalHockeyFan a aimé ceci.
15 janv. à 20 h 47
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,842
Mentions "j'aime": 2,515
Quoting: GoHabsGo99
you talked to Chevyscream


im glad someone took the time to speak to the source.
15 janv. à 20 h 50
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 5,067
Mentions "j'aime": 3,355
I think we're all pretty well aware if it's the 2nd and a prospect route it'll be the Habs 2024 2nd.
15 janv. à 20 h 50
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,205
Mentions "j'aime": 7,210
That's terrible for Winnipeg. Both pieces are far more valuable than Monahan to the Jets.
15 janv. à 20 h 51
#5
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,724
Mentions "j'aime": 6,798
Don’t understand why Habs fans think he’s worth a 1st.
Howie, Windjammer et Wpgman a aimé ceci.
15 janv. à 20 h 51
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,086
Mentions "j'aime": 1,463
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
I think we're all pretty well aware if it's the 2nd and a prospect route it'll be the Habs 2024 2nd.


Nope mtl 2nd is 40 or earlier take the 2025 second and move on you got a 1st for him just to take him
15 janv. à 20 h 53
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 5,067
Mentions "j'aime": 3,355
Quoting: Howie
Nope mtl 2nd is 40 or earlier take the 2025 second and move on you got a 1st for him just to take him


I guarantee you Treliving regrets that move, but it really doesn't have anything to do with this trade.
ricochetii a aimé ceci.
15 janv. à 20 h 55
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,792
Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
I can see Winnipeg buying in on Sean Monahan.
15 janv. à 20 h 58
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 23
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Don’t understand why Habs fans think he’s worth a 1st.


Some Habs reporters (Basu and Godin in particular) have started to downplay the potential return for Monahan. I think they may have gotten wind of what other teams have been saying they'd offer for him. Expectations should probably be tempered accordingly.
15 janv. à 21 h 0
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,205
Mentions "j'aime": 7,210
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Don’t understand why Habs fans think he’s worth a 1st.


A few Montreal fans are banking on some GM panicking and doing something stupid to try and save his job or something. A'la Florida with Chiarot. I think most rational Montreal fans realize he really isn't worth anywhere close to a first.
15 janv. à 21 h 1
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,866
Mentions "j'aime": 2,585
Quoting: Vancity2196
I can see Winnipeg buying in on Sean Monahan.


With the ultra defensive minded Rick Bowness as head coach I don't.
Windjammer a aimé ceci.
15 janv. à 21 h 5
#12
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,092
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Don’t understand why Habs fans think he’s worth a 1st.


I don't think he's going to Winnipeg because the fans obviously don't want him to, but there's an argument for that price. Doesn't mean it's guaranteed, but it's more likely than not. (At this point, the market can change the availability of some players.)

Why?
- Comparable stat line to Lindholm but cheaper, both in terms of cap hit and cost to acquire.
- There will be more teams after Monahan than Lindholm, and even more after Lindholm is moved.
- Market is pretty sparse for rental centers with production (power play or otherwise).

Why not?
- Some teams may still be hesitant about injury concerns. (Easily solved by adding conditions to picks.)
- He's at the top of the rental market. Some teams may prefer non-rentals.
- There were a lot of moves last year and therefore less assets on the market (such as 1st round picks).

If "your" team doesn't "need" him, great.
That has nothing to do with his value.
15 janv. à 21 h 11
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,086
Mentions "j'aime": 1,463
Quoting: Trizzak
Some Habs reporters (Basu and Godin in particular) have started to downplay the potential return for Monahan. I think they may have gotten wind of what other teams have been saying they'd offer for him. Expectations should probably be tempered accordingly.


Quoting: ricochetii
I don't think he's going to Winnipeg because the fans obviously don't want him to, but there's an argument for that price. Doesn't mean it's guaranteed, but it's more likely than not. (At this point, the market can change the availability of some players.)

Why?
- Comparable stat line to Lindholm but cheaper, both in terms of cap hit and cost to acquire.
- There will be more teams after Monahan than Lindholm, and even more after Lindholm is moved.
- Market is pretty sparse for rental centers with production (power play or otherwise).

Why not?
- Some teams may still be hesitant about injury concerns. (Easily solved by adding conditions to picks.)
- He's at the top of the rental market. Some teams may prefer non-rentals.
- There were a lot of moves last year and therefore less assets on the market (such as 1st round picks).

If "your" team doesn't "need" him, great.
That has nothing to do with his value.


A think a 2nd is fair tbh as Monahan has the injury history and his Analytics aren't that good and almost half his points are pp
15 janv. à 21 h 19
#14
Half Man/Half Amazin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 509
Mentions "j'aime": 64
Don't know why they hate on the idea to pick up Monahan. They aren't gonna give up any top prospects and you get another centre that wins draws. He doesn't need to score just need to win draws. Depth at centre is great for a playoff push.
ricochetii a aimé ceci.
15 janv. à 21 h 20
#15
TuckerKaberleSundin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,255
Mentions "j'aime": 636
Quoting: Windjammer
That's terrible for Winnipeg. Both pieces are far more valuable than Monahan to the Jets.



"Far more valuable" he said.

a 6th round pick with a projected 9 pts in in 47 games and a fantastic 0 points against his peers at wjc.

You should try not being a massive homer once in a while
drambui a aimé ceci.
15 janv. à 21 h 21
#16
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,637
Mentions "j'aime": 3,367
Quoting: ricochetii
I don't think he's going to Winnipeg because the fans obviously don't want him to, but there's an argument for that price. Doesn't mean it's guaranteed, but it's more likely than not. (At this point, the market can change the availability of some players.)

Why?
- Comparable stat line to Lindholm but cheaper, both in terms of cap hit and cost to acquire.
- There will be more teams after Monahan than Lindholm, and even more after Lindholm is moved.
- Market is pretty sparse for rental centers with production (power play or otherwise).

Why not?
- Some teams may still be hesitant about injury concerns. (Easily solved by adding conditions to picks.)
- He's at the top of the rental market. Some teams may prefer non-rentals.
- There were a lot of moves last year and therefore less assets on the market (such as 1st round picks).

If "your" team doesn't "need" him, great.
That has nothing to do with his value.


Was playing Monahan 4 minutes a night on the PP the plan to try and artificially make his numbers look better and inflate a trade return?

Bc his 5v5 results are UGLY, both offensively and defensively
Windjammer a aimé ceci.
15 janv. à 21 h 40
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,842
Mentions "j'aime": 2,515
Quoting: dgibb10
Was playing Monahan 4 minutes a night on the PP the plan to try and artificially make his numbers look better and inflate a trade return?

Bc his 5v5 results are UGLY, both offensively and defensively


so if he plays with good player, his points dont count, but if he plays with bad players, then his points count?

Monahan has been playing with 4th liner on 5v5 most nights.
15 janv. à 21 h 43
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,086
Mentions "j'aime": 1,463
Quoting: drambui
so if he plays with good player, his points dont count, but if he plays with bad players, then his points count?

Monahan has been playing with 4th liner on 5v5 most nights.


His Analytics are poor anyway with around half of his points on the top pp which he may not even get 2nd line pp time so what does he bring?
15 janv. à 21 h 44
#19
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,576
Mentions "j'aime": 2,209
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Don’t understand why Habs fans think he’s worth a 1st.


Cuz he is the second best C on the market, has a dirt cheap contract, and is better than some guys who got a first (or equivalent prospect) lately (Barbashev, Copp, Bertuzzi, etc.)
15 janv. à 21 h 45
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,086
Mentions "j'aime": 1,463
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Cuz he is the second best C on the market, has a dirt cheap contract, and is better than some guys who got a first (or equivalent prospect) lately (Barbashev, Copp, Bertuzzi, etc.)


He's definitely not the 2nd best center he's just onow to be available. His Analytics are poor and based om that I'd rather perry for a playoff run than Monahan.

Hes also not as good as copp Bertuzzi Barbashev when they were traded, had better analytics and don't have injury concerns
15 janv. à 21 h 48
#21
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,637
Mentions "j'aime": 3,367
Quoting: drambui
so if he plays with good player, his points dont count, but if he plays with bad players, then his points count?

Monahan has been playing with 4th liner on 5v5 most nights.


“Playing with good players” is not the same as playing in scenarios where your team has more players on the ice than the opponent.

If he was leading a particularly good power play I’d give him credit. But he’s not, the habs PP is below average. His numbers come from quantity of time on the PP that he doesn’t get anywhere else

Or even if he was the generator on the power play. But he’s not. He’s the net front guy. Every highlight you see is him standing in front waiting for someone else on the powerplay to break the defense’s structure and leave him wide open in front of the goalie. It’s not a hard job. And it’s not one he’s particularly good at. But he stat pads there.

Like if I had to think of a way to try and artificially inflate a guys stats, sticking him netfront on the PP 4 minutes a night would be exactly what I’d do
Howie et Windjammer a aimé ceci.
15 janv. à 21 h 52
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,842
Mentions "j'aime": 2,515
Quoting: Howie
His Analytics are poor anyway with around half of his points on the top pp which he may not even get 2nd line pp time so what does he bring?


im just saying if he had proper linemates who could play hockey he would also get better stats too. i dont think you can deny that.

he is always the best on his line.
15 janv. à 21 h 55
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,086
Mentions "j'aime": 1,463
Quoting: drambui
im just saying if he had proper linemates who could play hockey he would also get better stats too. i dont think you can deny that.

he is always the best on his line.


Doesn't matter his analytics are personal to him. Sure playing with better players will make the team stat there better but ultimately the analytics don't support that he's worth that much plus 4 min of pp time goes crazy to boost his stats artificially to seem better than he is
15 janv. à 21 h 56
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,842
Mentions "j'aime": 2,515
Quoting: dgibb10
“Playing with good players” is not the same as playing in scenarios where your team has more players on the ice than the opponent.

If he was leading a particularly good power play I’d give him credit. But he’s not, the habs PP is below average. His numbers come from quantity of time on the PP that he doesn’t get anywhere else

Or even if he was the generator on the power play. But he’s not. He’s the net front guy. Every highlight you see is him standing in front waiting for someone else on the powerplay to break the defense’s structure and leave him wide open in front of the goalie. It’s not a hard job. And it’s not one he’s particularly good at. But he stat pads there.

Like if I had to think of a way to try and artificially inflate a guys stats, sticking him netfront on the PP 4 minutes a night would be exactly what I’d do


i mean you could make that argument go both ways. someone needs to do that job. and if hes there its probably because hes the best at doing. the only guy you could argue would do as much of a good there would be suzuki.

in the end scoring a rebound goal or dangling around 4 guys still just count as one goal.

Im not pretending he is a god on the power play also.
15 janv. à 21 h 59
#25
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 12,637
Mentions "j'aime": 3,367
Quoting: drambui
i mean you could make that argument go both ways. someone needs to do that job. and if hes there its probably because hes the best at doing. the only guy you could argue would do as much of a good there would be suzuki.

in the end scoring a rebound goal or dangling around 4 guys still just count as one goal.

Im not pretending he is a god on the power play also.


I’m not saying the goals don’t count.

An acquiring team does not care about Monahan’s past production. They care about how he will impact their roster going forward.

As I have stated, he’s not anything special on the power play. So generally not going to provide a boost there.

His PK metrics are also underwhelming. Again a depth option there for whatever team acquires him but more likely they just already have 6 guys better at it and Monahan just doesn’t fill that role.

And at 5v5 his results have been bad.

So if he’s not helping improve your power play, your penalty kill, or your 5v5 play. Then how is helping a contender?
Windjammer a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage