Quoting: Shibbal18
Sabres aren't trading anything they'd miss, but they're not getting anything they need, so I don't see them doing it
Quoting: RClay321
this ain't it
Quoting: sabres89
Not a big fan of jokiharju, but it's mostly because I think the Sabres are gonna go dahlin, power, Samuelsson going forward, and I would rather round out the bottom 3 with a not puck moving skill set. Johnson makes a compelling case to join the mix, but that makes me want a bigger tougher defensive d, even more, for those other two spots. So I'm fine with moving jokiharju, but it's gotta make sense, I don't think this trade does.
Quoting: Tjm220
It comes down to the idea that Vancouver isn’t necessarily an ideal trade partner with Buffalo. They don’t really have what Buffalo needs, and the pieces Buffalo would want from them are not pieces they are willing to give up. I really like Dakota Joshua but I would go after him in free agency instead of trading for him.
Quoting: Tennisman142
Blues easily decline. Podklozin isn't a need because we have a lot of forward prospects. The other 2 are just throw ins that don't add much quality at all to this package. This is easily beaten by other teams
Hate the trades if you want, idc. This is certainly ideal world scenario. Just seeing if it even fits.
Hate the trades if you want, idc. This is certainly ideal world scenario. Just seeing if it even fits.
Hate the trades if you want, idc. This is certainly ideal world scenario. Just seeing if it even fits.
Hate the trades if you want, idc. This is certainly ideal world scenario. Just seeing if it even fits.
Hate the trades if you want, idc. This is certainly ideal world scenario. Just seeing if it even fits.
Hate the trades if you want, idc. This is certainly ideal world scenario. Just seeing if it even fits.
I posted it before you all said your bleh and I'll repeat it so you can see it again. I am aware this is an ideal scenario. It was more about the math.