Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

Tjm220

Sabres fan
Membre depuis
10 jui 2020
Équipe favorite
Sabres de Buffalo
Localisation
Tonawanda, NY
Messages dans les forums
2639
Messages par jour
6.96
Sujets de discussion
26
Biographie
Hockey savant
Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 7:02 pm
Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 6:34 pm
Sujet: gio and eichel
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buchiegang</b></div><div>Ok fair on the retain. What is your counteroffer?</div></div>
Buffalo still doesn’t need defenseman, especially not more left-handed ones. What they need are Young Forwards, especially the kind that can be added to the core. I understand a veteran player with some salary would have to come as well to make the cap work, but he should still be a useful player with some term. The bottom line is you have to pay a higher price than you’re probably prepared to, especially if you’re going to beat out all the other offers we can receive. I have always believed that when it comes to Jack Eichel if the trade doesn’t hurt then you’re not paying a high enough price.

Let me take a look at what the Rangers really have, and I’ll get back to you.
Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 11:54 pm
Sujet: we alright
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DiehardRedWingsFan58</b></div><div>LMFAO Yeah good luck thinking the NHL will close the college free agent loophole, It's been in existence for ages. You can't force a player that gets a 4 year degree to stay with a team that drafts them. They have every right to test free agency. That's the problem you've when you draft college bound players.</div></div>
College players with no professional experience, or junior players with no professional experience have not earned the right to be free agents just because they don’t like the team drafted them. Any player you draft should only be allowed to become a free agent if the team that drafts them does not attempt to sign them. Drafted players Who refuse to sign with the team that drafts them should be treated like restricted free agents because they have not earned the right to be unrestricted free agents. If a team drafts a player and doesn’t try to sign them then it should be fine that another team signs them as an unrestricted free agent because the team that drafted them did not extend a qualifying offer. That’s all I’m looking for. In terms of compensation for signing your drafted prospect that refused to sign with you after making a qualifying contract offer, I suppose it should be the team that signs that player needs to give up a draft pick from the same round used to draft the player. Does that really sound unreasonable?